Cargando…

Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection

BACKGROUND: Approximately 340,000 knee replacements are performed each year in the USA and UK. Around 1% of patients who have had knee replacement develop deep infection around the prosthesis: periprosthetic knee infection. Treatment often requires a combination of one or more major operations and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallon, Charlotte M, Gooberman-Hill, Rachael, Moore, Andrew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2264-7
_version_ 1783360275773128704
author Mallon, Charlotte M
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Moore, Andrew J
author_facet Mallon, Charlotte M
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Moore, Andrew J
author_sort Mallon, Charlotte M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 340,000 knee replacements are performed each year in the USA and UK. Around 1% of patients who have had knee replacement develop deep infection around the prosthesis: periprosthetic knee infection. Treatment often requires a combination of one or more major operations and antibiotic therapy. This study aimed to understand and characterise patients’ experiences of periprosthetic knee infection. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 patients (9 men, 7 women; 59–80 years, mean age 72) who experienced periprosthetic knee infection and subsequent revision treatment in six National Health Service orthopaedic departments. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed thematically. The concept of biographical disruption was used to frame our analysis, and four transcripts double-coded for rigour. Patients were interviewed between two and 10 months after surgical revision. RESULTS: Participant experiences can be characterised according to three aspects of biographical disruption which we have used to frame our analysis: onset and the problem of recognition; emerging disability and the problem of uncertainty, and chronic illness and the mobilisation of resources. Participants’ experiences of infection and treatment varied, but everyone who took part reported that infection and revision treatment had devastating effects on them. Participants described use of social and healthcare support and a need for more support. Some participants thought that the symptoms that they had first presented with had not been taken seriously enough. CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic knee infection and its treatment can be life-changing for patients, and there is a need for greater support throughout treatment and lengthy recovery. Future work could look at preparedness for adverse outcomes, help-seeking in impactful situations, and information for healthcare professionals about early signs and care for periprosthetic infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6167863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61678632018-10-09 Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection Mallon, Charlotte M Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Moore, Andrew J BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Approximately 340,000 knee replacements are performed each year in the USA and UK. Around 1% of patients who have had knee replacement develop deep infection around the prosthesis: periprosthetic knee infection. Treatment often requires a combination of one or more major operations and antibiotic therapy. This study aimed to understand and characterise patients’ experiences of periprosthetic knee infection. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 patients (9 men, 7 women; 59–80 years, mean age 72) who experienced periprosthetic knee infection and subsequent revision treatment in six National Health Service orthopaedic departments. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed thematically. The concept of biographical disruption was used to frame our analysis, and four transcripts double-coded for rigour. Patients were interviewed between two and 10 months after surgical revision. RESULTS: Participant experiences can be characterised according to three aspects of biographical disruption which we have used to frame our analysis: onset and the problem of recognition; emerging disability and the problem of uncertainty, and chronic illness and the mobilisation of resources. Participants’ experiences of infection and treatment varied, but everyone who took part reported that infection and revision treatment had devastating effects on them. Participants described use of social and healthcare support and a need for more support. Some participants thought that the symptoms that they had first presented with had not been taken seriously enough. CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic knee infection and its treatment can be life-changing for patients, and there is a need for greater support throughout treatment and lengthy recovery. Future work could look at preparedness for adverse outcomes, help-seeking in impactful situations, and information for healthcare professionals about early signs and care for periprosthetic infection. BioMed Central 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6167863/ /pubmed/30285692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2264-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mallon, Charlotte M
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Moore, Andrew J
Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection
title Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection
title_full Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection
title_fullStr Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection
title_full_unstemmed Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection
title_short Infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection
title_sort infection after knee replacement: a qualitative study of impact of periprosthetic knee infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2264-7
work_keys_str_mv AT malloncharlottem infectionafterkneereplacementaqualitativestudyofimpactofperiprosthetickneeinfection
AT goobermanhillrachael infectionafterkneereplacementaqualitativestudyofimpactofperiprosthetickneeinfection
AT mooreandrewj infectionafterkneereplacementaqualitativestudyofimpactofperiprosthetickneeinfection