Cargando…
Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection
In the face of rising prevalence of antibiotic resistance, susceptibility testing to provide personalized treatment is recommended prior to eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Yet, population specific treatment according to the local prevalence of antibiotic resistance may be an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12929-018-0471-z |
_version_ | 1783360276545929216 |
---|---|
author | Liou, Jyh-Ming Chen, Po-Yueh Kuo, Yu-Ting Wu, Ming-Shiang |
author_facet | Liou, Jyh-Ming Chen, Po-Yueh Kuo, Yu-Ting Wu, Ming-Shiang |
author_sort | Liou, Jyh-Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the face of rising prevalence of antibiotic resistance, susceptibility testing to provide personalized treatment is recommended prior to eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Yet, population specific treatment according to the local prevalence of antibiotic resistance may be an alternative if susceptibility testing is not available. In this article, we reviewed the global prevalence of primary antibiotic resistance and the efficacies of commonly used regimens in antibiotic susceptible and resistance strains. We then constructed a model to predict the efficacies of these regimens and proposed an algorithm to choose the optimal first-line and rescue therapies according to the prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Clarithromycin-based therapy (triple, sequential, concomitant, and hybrid therapies) for 14 days remains the treatment of choice in regions with low clarithromycin resistance (≤15%) and bismuth quadruple therapy may be an alternative therapy. In regions with high clarithromycin resistance (> 15%), bismuth quadruple therapy is the treatment of choice and non-bismuth quadruple therapy may be an alternative. Either levofloxacin-based therapy or bismuth quadruple therapy may be used as second-line rescue therapy for patients fail after clarithromycin-based therapies, whereas levofloxacin-based therapy may be used for patients fail after bismuth quadruple therapy. Susceptibility testing or genotypic resistance should be determined after two or more eradication failures. However, empirical therapy according to prior medication history to avoid the empirical reuse of levofloxacin and clarithromycin may be an acceptable alternative after consideration of cost, patient preference, and accessibility. Rifabutin-based therapy for 14 days may serve as the fourth-line therapy. New antibiotics specific for H. pylori are highly anticipated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12929-018-0471-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6167866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61678662018-10-09 Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection Liou, Jyh-Ming Chen, Po-Yueh Kuo, Yu-Ting Wu, Ming-Shiang J Biomed Sci Review In the face of rising prevalence of antibiotic resistance, susceptibility testing to provide personalized treatment is recommended prior to eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Yet, population specific treatment according to the local prevalence of antibiotic resistance may be an alternative if susceptibility testing is not available. In this article, we reviewed the global prevalence of primary antibiotic resistance and the efficacies of commonly used regimens in antibiotic susceptible and resistance strains. We then constructed a model to predict the efficacies of these regimens and proposed an algorithm to choose the optimal first-line and rescue therapies according to the prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Clarithromycin-based therapy (triple, sequential, concomitant, and hybrid therapies) for 14 days remains the treatment of choice in regions with low clarithromycin resistance (≤15%) and bismuth quadruple therapy may be an alternative therapy. In regions with high clarithromycin resistance (> 15%), bismuth quadruple therapy is the treatment of choice and non-bismuth quadruple therapy may be an alternative. Either levofloxacin-based therapy or bismuth quadruple therapy may be used as second-line rescue therapy for patients fail after clarithromycin-based therapies, whereas levofloxacin-based therapy may be used for patients fail after bismuth quadruple therapy. Susceptibility testing or genotypic resistance should be determined after two or more eradication failures. However, empirical therapy according to prior medication history to avoid the empirical reuse of levofloxacin and clarithromycin may be an acceptable alternative after consideration of cost, patient preference, and accessibility. Rifabutin-based therapy for 14 days may serve as the fourth-line therapy. New antibiotics specific for H. pylori are highly anticipated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12929-018-0471-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6167866/ /pubmed/30285834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12929-018-0471-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Liou, Jyh-Ming Chen, Po-Yueh Kuo, Yu-Ting Wu, Ming-Shiang Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection |
title | Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection |
title_full | Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection |
title_fullStr | Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection |
title_short | Toward population specific and personalized treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection |
title_sort | toward population specific and personalized treatment of helicobacter pylori infection |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12929-018-0471-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lioujyhming towardpopulationspecificandpersonalizedtreatmentofhelicobacterpyloriinfection AT chenpoyueh towardpopulationspecificandpersonalizedtreatmentofhelicobacterpyloriinfection AT kuoyuting towardpopulationspecificandpersonalizedtreatmentofhelicobacterpyloriinfection AT wumingshiang towardpopulationspecificandpersonalizedtreatmentofhelicobacterpyloriinfection AT towardpopulationspecificandpersonalizedtreatmentofhelicobacterpyloriinfection |