Cargando…
Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD
A single inhaler containing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) is a more convenient way of delivering triple therapy in patients with COPD. Single triple therapy has been shown to be superior at reducing exacerbations and improving q...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319248 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S177333 |
_version_ | 1783360295340605440 |
---|---|
author | Lipworth, Brian Kuo, Chris RuiWen Jabbal, Sunny |
author_facet | Lipworth, Brian Kuo, Chris RuiWen Jabbal, Sunny |
author_sort | Lipworth, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | A single inhaler containing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) is a more convenient way of delivering triple therapy in patients with COPD. Single triple therapy has been shown to be superior at reducing exacerbations and improving quality of life compared to LABA/LAMA, especially in patients with a prior history of frequent exacerbations and blood eosinophilia, who have ICS responsive disease. The corollary is that patients with infrequent exacerbations who are noneosinophilic may be safely de-escalated from triple therapy to LABA/LAMA without loss of control. Pointedly, there is a substantially increased risk of pneumonia associated with the triple therapy containing fluticasone furoate but not beclometasone dipropionate or budesonide. Since triple therapy is also better than ICS/LABA at reducing exacerbations and improving lung function, symptoms, and quality of life, this brings into question the rationale for using ICS/LABA. Hence, we propose a simplified pragmatic decision process based on symptoms, prior to exacerbation history, and blood eosinophils to select which patients should be given a single triple inhaler or LABA/LAMA. Differences in patient preference of inhaler device, formulations and drugs will also determine which triple inhaler prescribers elect to use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6167973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61679732018-10-12 Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD Lipworth, Brian Kuo, Chris RuiWen Jabbal, Sunny Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Editorial A single inhaler containing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) is a more convenient way of delivering triple therapy in patients with COPD. Single triple therapy has been shown to be superior at reducing exacerbations and improving quality of life compared to LABA/LAMA, especially in patients with a prior history of frequent exacerbations and blood eosinophilia, who have ICS responsive disease. The corollary is that patients with infrequent exacerbations who are noneosinophilic may be safely de-escalated from triple therapy to LABA/LAMA without loss of control. Pointedly, there is a substantially increased risk of pneumonia associated with the triple therapy containing fluticasone furoate but not beclometasone dipropionate or budesonide. Since triple therapy is also better than ICS/LABA at reducing exacerbations and improving lung function, symptoms, and quality of life, this brings into question the rationale for using ICS/LABA. Hence, we propose a simplified pragmatic decision process based on symptoms, prior to exacerbation history, and blood eosinophils to select which patients should be given a single triple inhaler or LABA/LAMA. Differences in patient preference of inhaler device, formulations and drugs will also determine which triple inhaler prescribers elect to use. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6167973/ /pubmed/30319248 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S177333 Text en © 2018 Lipworth et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Lipworth, Brian Kuo, Chris RuiWen Jabbal, Sunny Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD |
title | Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD |
title_full | Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD |
title_fullStr | Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD |
title_full_unstemmed | Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD |
title_short | Current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in COPD |
title_sort | current appraisal of single inhaler triple therapy in copd |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319248 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S177333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipworthbrian currentappraisalofsingleinhalertripletherapyincopd AT kuochrisruiwen currentappraisalofsingleinhalertripletherapyincopd AT jabbalsunny currentappraisalofsingleinhalertripletherapyincopd |