Cargando…

Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants

In this work, we shed new light on the highly debated issue of chromatin fragmentation in cryopreserved cells. Moreover, for the first time, we describe replicating cell-specific DNA damage and higher-order chromatin alterations after freezing and thawing. We identified DNA structural changes associ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falk, Martin, Falková, Iva, Kopečná, Olga, Bačíková, Alena, Pagáčová, Eva, Šimek, Daniel, Golan, Martin, Kozubek, Stanislav, Pekarová, Michaela, Follett, Shelby E., Klejdus, Bořivoj, Elliott, K. Wade, Varga, Krisztina, Teplá, Olga, Kratochvílová, Irena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6168476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30279538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32939-5
_version_ 1783360354666938368
author Falk, Martin
Falková, Iva
Kopečná, Olga
Bačíková, Alena
Pagáčová, Eva
Šimek, Daniel
Golan, Martin
Kozubek, Stanislav
Pekarová, Michaela
Follett, Shelby E.
Klejdus, Bořivoj
Elliott, K. Wade
Varga, Krisztina
Teplá, Olga
Kratochvílová, Irena
author_facet Falk, Martin
Falková, Iva
Kopečná, Olga
Bačíková, Alena
Pagáčová, Eva
Šimek, Daniel
Golan, Martin
Kozubek, Stanislav
Pekarová, Michaela
Follett, Shelby E.
Klejdus, Bořivoj
Elliott, K. Wade
Varga, Krisztina
Teplá, Olga
Kratochvílová, Irena
author_sort Falk, Martin
collection PubMed
description In this work, we shed new light on the highly debated issue of chromatin fragmentation in cryopreserved cells. Moreover, for the first time, we describe replicating cell-specific DNA damage and higher-order chromatin alterations after freezing and thawing. We identified DNA structural changes associated with the freeze-thaw process and correlated them with the viability of frozen and thawed cells. We simultaneously evaluated DNA defects and the higher-order chromatin structure of frozen and thawed cells with and without cryoprotectant treatment. We found that in replicating (S phase) cells, DNA was preferentially damaged by replication fork collapse, potentially leading to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), which represent an important source of both genome instability and defects in epigenome maintenance. This induction of DNA defects by the freeze-thaw process was not prevented by any cryoprotectant studied. Both in replicating and non-replicating cells, freezing and thawing altered the chromatin structure in a cryoprotectant-dependent manner. Interestingly, cells with condensed chromatin, which was strongly stimulated by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) prior to freezing had the highest rate of survival after thawing. Our results will facilitate the design of compounds and procedures to decrease injury to cryopreserved cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6168476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61684762018-10-05 Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants Falk, Martin Falková, Iva Kopečná, Olga Bačíková, Alena Pagáčová, Eva Šimek, Daniel Golan, Martin Kozubek, Stanislav Pekarová, Michaela Follett, Shelby E. Klejdus, Bořivoj Elliott, K. Wade Varga, Krisztina Teplá, Olga Kratochvílová, Irena Sci Rep Article In this work, we shed new light on the highly debated issue of chromatin fragmentation in cryopreserved cells. Moreover, for the first time, we describe replicating cell-specific DNA damage and higher-order chromatin alterations after freezing and thawing. We identified DNA structural changes associated with the freeze-thaw process and correlated them with the viability of frozen and thawed cells. We simultaneously evaluated DNA defects and the higher-order chromatin structure of frozen and thawed cells with and without cryoprotectant treatment. We found that in replicating (S phase) cells, DNA was preferentially damaged by replication fork collapse, potentially leading to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), which represent an important source of both genome instability and defects in epigenome maintenance. This induction of DNA defects by the freeze-thaw process was not prevented by any cryoprotectant studied. Both in replicating and non-replicating cells, freezing and thawing altered the chromatin structure in a cryoprotectant-dependent manner. Interestingly, cells with condensed chromatin, which was strongly stimulated by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) prior to freezing had the highest rate of survival after thawing. Our results will facilitate the design of compounds and procedures to decrease injury to cryopreserved cells. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6168476/ /pubmed/30279538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32939-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Falk, Martin
Falková, Iva
Kopečná, Olga
Bačíková, Alena
Pagáčová, Eva
Šimek, Daniel
Golan, Martin
Kozubek, Stanislav
Pekarová, Michaela
Follett, Shelby E.
Klejdus, Bořivoj
Elliott, K. Wade
Varga, Krisztina
Teplá, Olga
Kratochvílová, Irena
Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants
title Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants
title_full Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants
title_fullStr Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants
title_full_unstemmed Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants
title_short Chromatin architecture changes and DNA replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants
title_sort chromatin architecture changes and dna replication fork collapse are critical features in cryopreserved cells that are differentially controlled by cryoprotectants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6168476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30279538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32939-5
work_keys_str_mv AT falkmartin chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT falkovaiva chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT kopecnaolga chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT bacikovaalena chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT pagacovaeva chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT simekdaniel chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT golanmartin chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT kozubekstanislav chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT pekarovamichaela chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT follettshelbye chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT klejdusborivoj chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT elliottkwade chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT vargakrisztina chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT teplaolga chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants
AT kratochvilovairena chromatinarchitecturechangesanddnareplicationforkcollapsearecriticalfeaturesincryopreservedcellsthataredifferentiallycontrolledbycryoprotectants