Cargando…

Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological researches have indicated that microvessel density (MVD), reflecting angiogenesis, was a negatively prognostic factor of cervical cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between microvesse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xiaoli, Liu, Hailing, Ye, Miaomiao, Zhu, Xueqiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-018-0647-3
_version_ 1783360442142294016
author Hu, Xiaoli
Liu, Hailing
Ye, Miaomiao
Zhu, Xueqiong
author_facet Hu, Xiaoli
Liu, Hailing
Ye, Miaomiao
Zhu, Xueqiong
author_sort Hu, Xiaoli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological researches have indicated that microvessel density (MVD), reflecting angiogenesis, was a negatively prognostic factor of cervical cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between microvessel density and the survival probability of patients with cervical cancer. METHOD: There was a comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases up to August 31, 2017. Based on a fixed-effects or random-effects model, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from researches on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULT: Totally, we included 13 observational researches, involving 1097 patients with cervical cancer. The results showed that high level of microvessel density was negatively correlated with OS (HR = 1.79, 95% CIs 1.31–2.44, I(2) = 60.7%, P = 0.003) and DFS (HR = 1.47, 95% CIs 1.13–1.80, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.423) of cervical cancer patients. In subgroup analysis, high counts of MVD were significantly associated with a poor survival (including OS and DFS) of the patients detected by anti-factor VIII antibodies or in European origin. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicated that survival with high level of MVD was significant poorer than with low MVD in cervical cancer patient. Standardization of MVD assessment is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6169003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61690032018-10-10 Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer Hu, Xiaoli Liu, Hailing Ye, Miaomiao Zhu, Xueqiong Cancer Cell Int Review BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological researches have indicated that microvessel density (MVD), reflecting angiogenesis, was a negatively prognostic factor of cervical cancer. However, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between microvessel density and the survival probability of patients with cervical cancer. METHOD: There was a comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases up to August 31, 2017. Based on a fixed-effects or random-effects model, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from researches on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULT: Totally, we included 13 observational researches, involving 1097 patients with cervical cancer. The results showed that high level of microvessel density was negatively correlated with OS (HR = 1.79, 95% CIs 1.31–2.44, I(2) = 60.7%, P = 0.003) and DFS (HR = 1.47, 95% CIs 1.13–1.80, I(2) = 0%, P = 0.423) of cervical cancer patients. In subgroup analysis, high counts of MVD were significantly associated with a poor survival (including OS and DFS) of the patients detected by anti-factor VIII antibodies or in European origin. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicated that survival with high level of MVD was significant poorer than with low MVD in cervical cancer patient. Standardization of MVD assessment is needed. BioMed Central 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6169003/ /pubmed/30305802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-018-0647-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Hu, Xiaoli
Liu, Hailing
Ye, Miaomiao
Zhu, Xueqiong
Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer
title Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer
title_full Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer
title_short Prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer
title_sort prognostic value of microvessel density in cervical cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-018-0647-3
work_keys_str_mv AT huxiaoli prognosticvalueofmicrovesseldensityincervicalcancer
AT liuhailing prognosticvalueofmicrovesseldensityincervicalcancer
AT yemiaomiao prognosticvalueofmicrovesseldensityincervicalcancer
AT zhuxueqiong prognosticvalueofmicrovesseldensityincervicalcancer