Cargando…

Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change Study (FLEX) is a multi-site randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of an adaptive behavioral intervention to promote self-management and improve glycemic control for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. A two-step recruitment pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Standiford, Debra A., Morwessel, Nancy, Bishop, Franziska K., Thomas, Joan M., Smith, Emily, Crandell, Jamie, Driscoll, Kimberly A., Hunter, Christine M., Kichler, Jessica C., Maahs, David M., Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J., Seid, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2018.09.005
_version_ 1783360469670559744
author Standiford, Debra A.
Morwessel, Nancy
Bishop, Franziska K.
Thomas, Joan M.
Smith, Emily
Crandell, Jamie
Driscoll, Kimberly A.
Hunter, Christine M.
Kichler, Jessica C.
Maahs, David M.
Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J.
Seid, Michael
author_facet Standiford, Debra A.
Morwessel, Nancy
Bishop, Franziska K.
Thomas, Joan M.
Smith, Emily
Crandell, Jamie
Driscoll, Kimberly A.
Hunter, Christine M.
Kichler, Jessica C.
Maahs, David M.
Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J.
Seid, Michael
author_sort Standiford, Debra A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change Study (FLEX) is a multi-site randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of an adaptive behavioral intervention to promote self-management and improve glycemic control for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. A two-step recruitment process was used to optimize study retention by facilitating informed decision-making regarding participation. METHODS: Those who expressed interest at first contact were given more detailed study information followed by telephone calls to the adolescents and their parents to answer questions and explore potential barriers to participation before making a decision regarding study enrollment. RESULTS: Of 694 eligible adolescents who were invited to participate, 397 (57.2%) expressed interest when initially contacted (Step 1). Upon completion of the follow-up telephone calls (Step 2), 276 (39.8%) still agreed to participate; and 258 (37.2%) enrolled and completed a baseline visit with a parent/guardian. Completion rates for measurement visits remained high throughout the study, with an end-of-study retention rate of 93.4%; and only 12 (4.7%) families withdrew from the study. CONCLUSION: The two-step recruitment process encourages potential participants to thoughtfully evaluate their willingness to participate, as well as their ability to make a commitment to the full completion of study requirements. When demonstrating the efficacy of a randomized controlled trial, it may be preferable to accept lower recruitment rates in order to optimize retention rates. The additional time and effort required to implement this two-step process is worthwhile. With a high retention rate, we can be more confident that the outcomes of the randomized controlled trial actually reflect the impact of the intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6169149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61691492018-10-05 Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial Standiford, Debra A. Morwessel, Nancy Bishop, Franziska K. Thomas, Joan M. Smith, Emily Crandell, Jamie Driscoll, Kimberly A. Hunter, Christine M. Kichler, Jessica C. Maahs, David M. Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J. Seid, Michael Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article INTRODUCTION: The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change Study (FLEX) is a multi-site randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of an adaptive behavioral intervention to promote self-management and improve glycemic control for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. A two-step recruitment process was used to optimize study retention by facilitating informed decision-making regarding participation. METHODS: Those who expressed interest at first contact were given more detailed study information followed by telephone calls to the adolescents and their parents to answer questions and explore potential barriers to participation before making a decision regarding study enrollment. RESULTS: Of 694 eligible adolescents who were invited to participate, 397 (57.2%) expressed interest when initially contacted (Step 1). Upon completion of the follow-up telephone calls (Step 2), 276 (39.8%) still agreed to participate; and 258 (37.2%) enrolled and completed a baseline visit with a parent/guardian. Completion rates for measurement visits remained high throughout the study, with an end-of-study retention rate of 93.4%; and only 12 (4.7%) families withdrew from the study. CONCLUSION: The two-step recruitment process encourages potential participants to thoughtfully evaluate their willingness to participate, as well as their ability to make a commitment to the full completion of study requirements. When demonstrating the efficacy of a randomized controlled trial, it may be preferable to accept lower recruitment rates in order to optimize retention rates. The additional time and effort required to implement this two-step process is worthwhile. With a high retention rate, we can be more confident that the outcomes of the randomized controlled trial actually reflect the impact of the intervention. Elsevier 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6169149/ /pubmed/30294698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2018.09.005 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Standiford, Debra A.
Morwessel, Nancy
Bishop, Franziska K.
Thomas, Joan M.
Smith, Emily
Crandell, Jamie
Driscoll, Kimberly A.
Hunter, Christine M.
Kichler, Jessica C.
Maahs, David M.
Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J.
Seid, Michael
Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial
title Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial
title_full Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial
title_fullStr Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial
title_short Two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in FLEX clinical trial
title_sort two-step recruitment process optimizes retention in flex clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2018.09.005
work_keys_str_mv AT standiforddebraa twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT morwesselnancy twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT bishopfranziskak twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT thomasjoanm twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT smithemily twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT crandelljamie twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT driscollkimberlya twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT hunterchristinem twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT kichlerjessicac twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT maahsdavidm twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT mayerdaviselizabethj twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial
AT seidmichael twosteprecruitmentprocessoptimizesretentioninflexclinicaltrial