Cargando…

Kindred spirits?

In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gamson, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002
_version_ 1783360469907537920
author Gamson, Joshua
author_facet Gamson, Joshua
author_sort Gamson, Joshua
collection PubMed
description In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I suggest that two threads connect these various aspects of reproductive politics: the commitment to self-determination, and an expanded understanding of kinship beyond the nuclear and the biological. These two themes stand in complicated tension – visible in debates over the ethics of surrogacy, for instance, and in the ways that queer family-making is facilitated, in part, by class and racial inequalities – that need to be confronted head-on. I conclude with some examples of what political kinship built around family justice can and does look like at the level of concrete action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6169150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61691502018-10-05 Kindred spirits? Gamson, Joshua Reprod Biomed Soc Online Queering Kinship 2.0 In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I suggest that two threads connect these various aspects of reproductive politics: the commitment to self-determination, and an expanded understanding of kinship beyond the nuclear and the biological. These two themes stand in complicated tension – visible in debates over the ethics of surrogacy, for instance, and in the ways that queer family-making is facilitated, in part, by class and racial inequalities – that need to be confronted head-on. I conclude with some examples of what political kinship built around family justice can and does look like at the level of concrete action. Elsevier 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6169150/ /pubmed/30294685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Queering Kinship 2.0
Gamson, Joshua
Kindred spirits?
title Kindred spirits?
title_full Kindred spirits?
title_fullStr Kindred spirits?
title_full_unstemmed Kindred spirits?
title_short Kindred spirits?
title_sort kindred spirits?
topic Queering Kinship 2.0
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT gamsonjoshua kindredspirits