Cargando…
Kindred spirits?
In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002 |
_version_ | 1783360469907537920 |
---|---|
author | Gamson, Joshua |
author_facet | Gamson, Joshua |
author_sort | Gamson, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I suggest that two threads connect these various aspects of reproductive politics: the commitment to self-determination, and an expanded understanding of kinship beyond the nuclear and the biological. These two themes stand in complicated tension – visible in debates over the ethics of surrogacy, for instance, and in the ways that queer family-making is facilitated, in part, by class and racial inequalities – that need to be confronted head-on. I conclude with some examples of what political kinship built around family justice can and does look like at the level of concrete action. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6169150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61691502018-10-05 Kindred spirits? Gamson, Joshua Reprod Biomed Soc Online Queering Kinship 2.0 In this commentary, I reflect on the connections and strains between various efforts to expand options for family-making, to reduce the inequities that structure family-making through assisted reproduction and adoption, to secure and protect reproductive rights, and to pursue reproductive justice. I suggest that two threads connect these various aspects of reproductive politics: the commitment to self-determination, and an expanded understanding of kinship beyond the nuclear and the biological. These two themes stand in complicated tension – visible in debates over the ethics of surrogacy, for instance, and in the ways that queer family-making is facilitated, in part, by class and racial inequalities – that need to be confronted head-on. I conclude with some examples of what political kinship built around family justice can and does look like at the level of concrete action. Elsevier 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6169150/ /pubmed/30294685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Queering Kinship 2.0 Gamson, Joshua Kindred spirits? |
title | Kindred spirits? |
title_full | Kindred spirits? |
title_fullStr | Kindred spirits? |
title_full_unstemmed | Kindred spirits? |
title_short | Kindred spirits? |
title_sort | kindred spirits? |
topic | Queering Kinship 2.0 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.04.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gamsonjoshua kindredspirits |