Cargando…

Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns

Over the past few decades, antismoking public service announcements (PSAs) have been used by governments to promote healthy behaviours in citizens, for instance, against drinking before the drive and against smoke. Effectiveness of such PSAs has been suggested especially for young persons. By now, P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modica, Enrica, Rossi, Dario, Cartocci, Giulia, Perrotta, Davide, Di Feo, Paolo, Mancini, Marco, Aricò, Pietro, Inguscio, Bianca M. S., Babiloni, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9721561
_version_ 1783360479721160704
author Modica, Enrica
Rossi, Dario
Cartocci, Giulia
Perrotta, Davide
Di Feo, Paolo
Mancini, Marco
Aricò, Pietro
Inguscio, Bianca M. S.
Babiloni, Fabio
author_facet Modica, Enrica
Rossi, Dario
Cartocci, Giulia
Perrotta, Davide
Di Feo, Paolo
Mancini, Marco
Aricò, Pietro
Inguscio, Bianca M. S.
Babiloni, Fabio
author_sort Modica, Enrica
collection PubMed
description Over the past few decades, antismoking public service announcements (PSAs) have been used by governments to promote healthy behaviours in citizens, for instance, against drinking before the drive and against smoke. Effectiveness of such PSAs has been suggested especially for young persons. By now, PSAs efficacy is still mainly assessed through traditional methods (questionnaires and metrics) and could be performed only after the PSAs broadcasting, leading to waste of economic resources and time in the case of Ineffective PSAs. One possible countermeasure to such ineffective use of PSAs could be promoted by the evaluation of the cerebral reaction to the PSA of particular segments of population (e.g., old, young, and heavy smokers). In addition, it is crucial to gather such cerebral activity in front of PSAs that have been assessed to be effective against smoke (Effective PSAs), comparing results to the cerebral reactions to PSAs that have been certified to be not effective (Ineffective PSAs). The eventual differences between the cerebral responses toward the two PSA groups will provide crucial information about the possible outcome of new PSAs before to its broadcasting. This study focused on adult population, by investigating the cerebral reaction to the vision of different PSA images, which have already been shown to be Effective and Ineffective for the promotion of an antismoking behaviour. Results showed how variables as gender and smoking habits can influence the perception of PSA images, and how different communication styles of the antismoking campaigns could facilitate the comprehension of PSA's message and then enhance the related impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6169221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61692212018-10-16 Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns Modica, Enrica Rossi, Dario Cartocci, Giulia Perrotta, Davide Di Feo, Paolo Mancini, Marco Aricò, Pietro Inguscio, Bianca M. S. Babiloni, Fabio Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Over the past few decades, antismoking public service announcements (PSAs) have been used by governments to promote healthy behaviours in citizens, for instance, against drinking before the drive and against smoke. Effectiveness of such PSAs has been suggested especially for young persons. By now, PSAs efficacy is still mainly assessed through traditional methods (questionnaires and metrics) and could be performed only after the PSAs broadcasting, leading to waste of economic resources and time in the case of Ineffective PSAs. One possible countermeasure to such ineffective use of PSAs could be promoted by the evaluation of the cerebral reaction to the PSA of particular segments of population (e.g., old, young, and heavy smokers). In addition, it is crucial to gather such cerebral activity in front of PSAs that have been assessed to be effective against smoke (Effective PSAs), comparing results to the cerebral reactions to PSAs that have been certified to be not effective (Ineffective PSAs). The eventual differences between the cerebral responses toward the two PSA groups will provide crucial information about the possible outcome of new PSAs before to its broadcasting. This study focused on adult population, by investigating the cerebral reaction to the vision of different PSA images, which have already been shown to be Effective and Ineffective for the promotion of an antismoking behaviour. Results showed how variables as gender and smoking habits can influence the perception of PSA images, and how different communication styles of the antismoking campaigns could facilitate the comprehension of PSA's message and then enhance the related impact. Hindawi 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6169221/ /pubmed/30327667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9721561 Text en Copyright © 2018 Enrica Modica et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Modica, Enrica
Rossi, Dario
Cartocci, Giulia
Perrotta, Davide
Di Feo, Paolo
Mancini, Marco
Aricò, Pietro
Inguscio, Bianca M. S.
Babiloni, Fabio
Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns
title Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns
title_full Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns
title_fullStr Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns
title_short Neurophysiological Profile of Antismoking Campaigns
title_sort neurophysiological profile of antismoking campaigns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9721561
work_keys_str_mv AT modicaenrica neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT rossidario neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT cartoccigiulia neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT perrottadavide neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT difeopaolo neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT mancinimarco neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT aricopietro neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT ingusciobiancams neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns
AT babilonifabio neurophysiologicalprofileofantismokingcampaigns