Cargando…
Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and qualitatively review the statistical approaches used in prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported intensive longitudinal data (ILD) (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Since...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30282683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022626 |
_version_ | 1783360552940077056 |
---|---|
author | Windt, Johann Ardern, Clare L Gabbett, Tim J Khan, Karim M Cook, Chad E Sporer, Ben C Zumbo, Bruno D |
author_facet | Windt, Johann Ardern, Clare L Gabbett, Tim J Khan, Karim M Cook, Chad E Sporer, Ben C Zumbo, Bruno D |
author_sort | Windt, Johann |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and qualitatively review the statistical approaches used in prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported intensive longitudinal data (ILD) (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Since longitudinal research can be improved by aligning the (1) theoretical model, (2) temporal design and (3) statistical approach, we reviewed the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate how closely they aligned these three components. DESIGN: Methodological review. METHODS: After finding 6 systematic reviews and 1 consensus statement in our systematic search, we extracted 34 original prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported ILD (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Using Professor Linda Collins’ three-part framework of aligning the theoretical model, temporal design and statistical approach, we qualitatively assessed how well the statistical approaches aligned with the intensive longitudinal nature of the data, and with the underlying theoretical model. Finally, we discussed the implications of each statistical approach and provide recommendations for future research. RESULTS: Statistical methods such as correlations, t-tests and simple linear/logistic regression were commonly used. However, these methods did not adequately address the (1) themes of theoretical models underlying workloads and injury, nor the (2) temporal design challenges (ILD). Although time-to-event analyses (eg, Cox proportional hazards and frailty models) and multilevel modelling are better-suited for ILD, these were used in fewer than a 10% of the studies (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly accelerating availability of ILD is the norm in many fields of healthcare delivery and thus health research. These data present an opportunity to better address research questions, especially when appropriate statistical analyses are chosen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6169745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61697452018-10-05 Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies Windt, Johann Ardern, Clare L Gabbett, Tim J Khan, Karim M Cook, Chad E Sporer, Ben C Zumbo, Bruno D BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and qualitatively review the statistical approaches used in prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported intensive longitudinal data (ILD) (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Since longitudinal research can be improved by aligning the (1) theoretical model, (2) temporal design and (3) statistical approach, we reviewed the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate how closely they aligned these three components. DESIGN: Methodological review. METHODS: After finding 6 systematic reviews and 1 consensus statement in our systematic search, we extracted 34 original prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported ILD (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Using Professor Linda Collins’ three-part framework of aligning the theoretical model, temporal design and statistical approach, we qualitatively assessed how well the statistical approaches aligned with the intensive longitudinal nature of the data, and with the underlying theoretical model. Finally, we discussed the implications of each statistical approach and provide recommendations for future research. RESULTS: Statistical methods such as correlations, t-tests and simple linear/logistic regression were commonly used. However, these methods did not adequately address the (1) themes of theoretical models underlying workloads and injury, nor the (2) temporal design challenges (ILD). Although time-to-event analyses (eg, Cox proportional hazards and frailty models) and multilevel modelling are better-suited for ILD, these were used in fewer than a 10% of the studies (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly accelerating availability of ILD is the norm in many fields of healthcare delivery and thus health research. These data present an opportunity to better address research questions, especially when appropriate statistical analyses are chosen. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6169745/ /pubmed/30282683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022626 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Sports and Exercise Medicine Windt, Johann Ardern, Clare L Gabbett, Tim J Khan, Karim M Cook, Chad E Sporer, Ben C Zumbo, Bruno D Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies |
title | Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies |
title_full | Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies |
title_fullStr | Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies |
title_short | Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies |
title_sort | getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies |
topic | Sports and Exercise Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30282683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT windtjohann gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies AT ardernclarel gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies AT gabbetttimj gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies AT khankarimm gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies AT cookchade gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies AT sporerbenc gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies AT zumbobrunod gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies |