Cargando…

Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies

OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and qualitatively review the statistical approaches used in prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported intensive longitudinal data (ILD) (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Since...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Windt, Johann, Ardern, Clare L, Gabbett, Tim J, Khan, Karim M, Cook, Chad E, Sporer, Ben C, Zumbo, Bruno D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30282683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022626
_version_ 1783360552940077056
author Windt, Johann
Ardern, Clare L
Gabbett, Tim J
Khan, Karim M
Cook, Chad E
Sporer, Ben C
Zumbo, Bruno D
author_facet Windt, Johann
Ardern, Clare L
Gabbett, Tim J
Khan, Karim M
Cook, Chad E
Sporer, Ben C
Zumbo, Bruno D
author_sort Windt, Johann
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and qualitatively review the statistical approaches used in prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported intensive longitudinal data (ILD) (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Since longitudinal research can be improved by aligning the (1) theoretical model, (2) temporal design and (3) statistical approach, we reviewed the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate how closely they aligned these three components. DESIGN: Methodological review. METHODS: After finding 6 systematic reviews and 1 consensus statement in our systematic search, we extracted 34 original prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported ILD (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Using Professor Linda Collins’ three-part framework of aligning the theoretical model, temporal design and statistical approach, we qualitatively assessed how well the statistical approaches aligned with the intensive longitudinal nature of the data, and with the underlying theoretical model. Finally, we discussed the implications of each statistical approach and provide recommendations for future research. RESULTS: Statistical methods such as correlations, t-tests and simple linear/logistic regression were commonly used. However, these methods did not adequately address the (1) themes of theoretical models underlying workloads and injury, nor the (2) temporal design challenges (ILD). Although time-to-event analyses (eg, Cox proportional hazards and frailty models) and multilevel modelling are better-suited for ILD, these were used in fewer than a 10% of the studies (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly accelerating availability of ILD is the norm in many fields of healthcare delivery and thus health research. These data present an opportunity to better address research questions, especially when appropriate statistical analyses are chosen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6169745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61697452018-10-05 Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies Windt, Johann Ardern, Clare L Gabbett, Tim J Khan, Karim M Cook, Chad E Sporer, Ben C Zumbo, Bruno D BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify and qualitatively review the statistical approaches used in prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported intensive longitudinal data (ILD) (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Since longitudinal research can be improved by aligning the (1) theoretical model, (2) temporal design and (3) statistical approach, we reviewed the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate how closely they aligned these three components. DESIGN: Methodological review. METHODS: After finding 6 systematic reviews and 1 consensus statement in our systematic search, we extracted 34 original prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported ILD (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Using Professor Linda Collins’ three-part framework of aligning the theoretical model, temporal design and statistical approach, we qualitatively assessed how well the statistical approaches aligned with the intensive longitudinal nature of the data, and with the underlying theoretical model. Finally, we discussed the implications of each statistical approach and provide recommendations for future research. RESULTS: Statistical methods such as correlations, t-tests and simple linear/logistic regression were commonly used. However, these methods did not adequately address the (1) themes of theoretical models underlying workloads and injury, nor the (2) temporal design challenges (ILD). Although time-to-event analyses (eg, Cox proportional hazards and frailty models) and multilevel modelling are better-suited for ILD, these were used in fewer than a 10% of the studies (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly accelerating availability of ILD is the norm in many fields of healthcare delivery and thus health research. These data present an opportunity to better address research questions, especially when appropriate statistical analyses are chosen. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6169745/ /pubmed/30282683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022626 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Windt, Johann
Ardern, Clare L
Gabbett, Tim J
Khan, Karim M
Cook, Chad E
Sporer, Ben C
Zumbo, Bruno D
Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
title Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
title_full Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
title_fullStr Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
title_full_unstemmed Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
title_short Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
title_sort getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload–injury studies
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30282683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022626
work_keys_str_mv AT windtjohann gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies
AT ardernclarel gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies
AT gabbetttimj gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies
AT khankarimm gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies
AT cookchade gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies
AT sporerbenc gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies
AT zumbobrunod gettingthemostoutofintensivelongitudinaldataamethodologicalreviewofworkloadinjurystudies