Cargando…
Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling
INTRODUCTION: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356342 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009 |
_version_ | 1783360561874993152 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Juan Bardawil, Elise Zurawin, Robert K. Wu, Junwei Fu, Huaying Orejuela, Francisco Guan, Xiaoming |
author_facet | Liu, Juan Bardawil, Elise Zurawin, Robert K. Wu, Junwei Fu, Huaying Orejuela, Francisco Guan, Xiaoming |
author_sort | Liu, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP–Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was −5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50–99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 ± 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 ± 3.02 and 5.80 ± 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications. DISCUSSION: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6169819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61698192018-10-23 Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling Liu, Juan Bardawil, Elise Zurawin, Robert K. Wu, Junwei Fu, Huaying Orejuela, Francisco Guan, Xiaoming JSLS Case Series INTRODUCTION: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP–Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was −5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50–99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 ± 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 ± 3.02 and 5.80 ± 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications. DISCUSSION: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6169819/ /pubmed/30356342 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009 Text en © 2018 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Case Series Liu, Juan Bardawil, Elise Zurawin, Robert K. Wu, Junwei Fu, Huaying Orejuela, Francisco Guan, Xiaoming Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling |
title | Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling |
title_full | Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling |
title_fullStr | Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling |
title_short | Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling |
title_sort | robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy with retroperitoneal tunneling |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356342 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liujuan roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling AT bardawilelise roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling AT zurawinrobertk roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling AT wujunwei roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling AT fuhuaying roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling AT orejuelafrancisco roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling AT guanxiaoming roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling |