Cargando…

Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling

INTRODUCTION: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Juan, Bardawil, Elise, Zurawin, Robert K., Wu, Junwei, Fu, Huaying, Orejuela, Francisco, Guan, Xiaoming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356342
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009
_version_ 1783360561874993152
author Liu, Juan
Bardawil, Elise
Zurawin, Robert K.
Wu, Junwei
Fu, Huaying
Orejuela, Francisco
Guan, Xiaoming
author_facet Liu, Juan
Bardawil, Elise
Zurawin, Robert K.
Wu, Junwei
Fu, Huaying
Orejuela, Francisco
Guan, Xiaoming
author_sort Liu, Juan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP–Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was −5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50–99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 ± 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 ± 3.02 and 5.80 ± 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications. DISCUSSION: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6169819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61698192018-10-23 Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling Liu, Juan Bardawil, Elise Zurawin, Robert K. Wu, Junwei Fu, Huaying Orejuela, Francisco Guan, Xiaoming JSLS Case Series INTRODUCTION: This series of cases was an investigation of the safety and feasibility of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (R-LESS) as a method of performing sacrocolpopexy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a retrospective series of 15 cases of R-LESS sacrocolpopexy with the V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) suture and a retroperitoneal tunneling technique performed by a single surgeon, combined with a literature review. Patient demographic information and perioperative data were analyzed. The standard robotic sacrocolpopexy steps were followed, but the surgeon used a combined technique of V-Loc suture and retroperitoneal tunneling to simplify the procedure. No additional ports were necessary in any of the patients. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP–Q) scoring method, the mean preoperative C-point of the 15 patients was +1.16 compared to the mean immediate postoperative C-point, which was −5.5. The mean total sacrocolpopexy time was 74.7 (range, 50–99) minutes and mean mesh anchoring time was 22.60 ± 3.85 minutes. The mean sacral promontory fixation and tunneling and mesh position times were 11.87 ± 3.02 and 5.80 ± 2.14 minutes, respectively. All 15 cases were performed without perioperative or long-term complications. DISCUSSION: R-LESS in combination with the V-Loc suture and the retroperitoneal tunneling technique can be safely and feasibly performed, especially in sacrocolpopexy and, potentially, in other POP surgeries. With adequate and systematic training, surgeons can acquire the necessary skills to perform this complex surgical procedure. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6169819/ /pubmed/30356342 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009 Text en © 2018 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Case Series
Liu, Juan
Bardawil, Elise
Zurawin, Robert K.
Wu, Junwei
Fu, Huaying
Orejuela, Francisco
Guan, Xiaoming
Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling
title Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling
title_full Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling
title_fullStr Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling
title_short Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling
title_sort robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy with retroperitoneal tunneling
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356342
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00009
work_keys_str_mv AT liujuan roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling
AT bardawilelise roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling
AT zurawinrobertk roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling
AT wujunwei roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling
AT fuhuaying roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling
AT orejuelafrancisco roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling
AT guanxiaoming roboticsinglesitesacrocolpopexywithretroperitonealtunneling