Cargando…

Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Chase, Bowers, Aaron, Wayant, Cole, Checketts, Jake, Scott, Jared, Musuvathy, Sanjeev, Vassar, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30281671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204720
_version_ 1783360585578053632
author Meyer, Chase
Bowers, Aaron
Wayant, Cole
Checketts, Jake
Scott, Jared
Musuvathy, Sanjeev
Vassar, Matt
author_facet Meyer, Chase
Bowers, Aaron
Wayant, Cole
Checketts, Jake
Scott, Jared
Musuvathy, Sanjeev
Vassar, Matt
author_sort Meyer, Chase
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs are supported by evidence which varies in quality. We aim to survey the clinical practice guidelines created by the American College of Gastroenterology, report the level of evidence supporting their recommendations, and identify areas where evidence can be improved with additional research. METHODS: We extracted 1328 recommendations from 39 clinical practice guidelines published by the American College of Gastroenterology. Several of the clinical practice guidelines used the differing classifications of evidence for their recommendations. To standardize our results, we devised a uniform system for evidence. RESULTS: A total of 39 clinical practice guidelines were surveyed in our study. Together they account for 1328 recommendations. 693 (52.2%) of the recommendations were based on low evidence, indicating poor evidence or expert opinion. Among individual guidelines, 13/39 (33.3%) had no recommendations based on high evidence. CONCLUSION: Very few recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are supported by high levels of evidence. More than half of all recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6169920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61699202018-10-19 Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines Meyer, Chase Bowers, Aaron Wayant, Cole Checketts, Jake Scott, Jared Musuvathy, Sanjeev Vassar, Matt PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs are supported by evidence which varies in quality. We aim to survey the clinical practice guidelines created by the American College of Gastroenterology, report the level of evidence supporting their recommendations, and identify areas where evidence can be improved with additional research. METHODS: We extracted 1328 recommendations from 39 clinical practice guidelines published by the American College of Gastroenterology. Several of the clinical practice guidelines used the differing classifications of evidence for their recommendations. To standardize our results, we devised a uniform system for evidence. RESULTS: A total of 39 clinical practice guidelines were surveyed in our study. Together they account for 1328 recommendations. 693 (52.2%) of the recommendations were based on low evidence, indicating poor evidence or expert opinion. Among individual guidelines, 13/39 (33.3%) had no recommendations based on high evidence. CONCLUSION: Very few recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are supported by high levels of evidence. More than half of all recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion. Public Library of Science 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6169920/ /pubmed/30281671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204720 Text en © 2018 Meyer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meyer, Chase
Bowers, Aaron
Wayant, Cole
Checketts, Jake
Scott, Jared
Musuvathy, Sanjeev
Vassar, Matt
Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
title Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
title_full Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
title_fullStr Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
title_short Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
title_sort scientific evidence underlying the american college of gastroenterology’s clinical practice guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30281671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204720
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerchase scientificevidenceunderlyingtheamericancollegeofgastroenterologysclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT bowersaaron scientificevidenceunderlyingtheamericancollegeofgastroenterologysclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT wayantcole scientificevidenceunderlyingtheamericancollegeofgastroenterologysclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT checkettsjake scientificevidenceunderlyingtheamericancollegeofgastroenterologysclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT scottjared scientificevidenceunderlyingtheamericancollegeofgastroenterologysclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT musuvathysanjeev scientificevidenceunderlyingtheamericancollegeofgastroenterologysclinicalpracticeguidelines
AT vassarmatt scientificevidenceunderlyingtheamericancollegeofgastroenterologysclinicalpracticeguidelines