Cargando…

Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records

OBJECTIVES: Depression is the most common mental health disorder and mediates outcomes for many chronic diseases. Ability to accurately identify and monitor this condition, at the local level, is often limited to estimates from national surveys. This study sought to compare and validate electronic h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davidson, Arthur J., Xu, Stanley, Oronce, Carlos Irwin A., Durfee, M. Josh, McCormick, Emily V., Steiner, John F., Havranek, Edward, Beck, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6170150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000751
_version_ 1783360605909942272
author Davidson, Arthur J.
Xu, Stanley
Oronce, Carlos Irwin A.
Durfee, M. Josh
McCormick, Emily V.
Steiner, John F.
Havranek, Edward
Beck, Arne
author_facet Davidson, Arthur J.
Xu, Stanley
Oronce, Carlos Irwin A.
Durfee, M. Josh
McCormick, Emily V.
Steiner, John F.
Havranek, Edward
Beck, Arne
author_sort Davidson, Arthur J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Depression is the most common mental health disorder and mediates outcomes for many chronic diseases. Ability to accurately identify and monitor this condition, at the local level, is often limited to estimates from national surveys. This study sought to compare and validate electronic health record (EHR)-based depression surveillance with multiple data sources for more granular demographic subgroup and subcounty measurements. DESIGN/SETTING: A survey compared data sources for the ability to provide subcounty (eg, census tract [CT]) depression prevalence estimates. Using 2011-2012 EHR data from 2 large health care providers, and American Community Survey data, depression rates were estimated by CT for Denver County, Colorado. Sociodemographic and geographic (residence) attributes were analyzed and described. Spatial analysis assessed for clusters of higher or lower depression prevalence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Depression prevalence estimates by CT. RESULTS: National and local survey-based depression prevalence estimates ranged from 7% to 17% but were limited to county level. Electronic health record data provided subcounty depression prevalence estimates by sociodemographic and geographic groups (CT range: 5%-20%). Overall depression prevalence was 13%; rates were higher for women (16% vs men 9%), whites (16%), and increased with age and homeless patients (18%). Areas of higher and lower EHR-based, depression prevalence were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic health record–based depression prevalence varied by CT, gender, race/ethnicity, age, and living status. Electronic health record–based surveillance complements traditional methods with greater timeliness and granularity. Validation through subcounty-level qualitative or survey approaches should assess accuracy and address concerns about EHR selection bias. Public health agencies should consider the opportunity and evaluate EHR system data as a surveillance tool to estimate subcounty chronic disease prevalence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6170150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61701502018-10-15 Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records Davidson, Arthur J. Xu, Stanley Oronce, Carlos Irwin A. Durfee, M. Josh McCormick, Emily V. Steiner, John F. Havranek, Edward Beck, Arne J Public Health Manag Pract Research Reports OBJECTIVES: Depression is the most common mental health disorder and mediates outcomes for many chronic diseases. Ability to accurately identify and monitor this condition, at the local level, is often limited to estimates from national surveys. This study sought to compare and validate electronic health record (EHR)-based depression surveillance with multiple data sources for more granular demographic subgroup and subcounty measurements. DESIGN/SETTING: A survey compared data sources for the ability to provide subcounty (eg, census tract [CT]) depression prevalence estimates. Using 2011-2012 EHR data from 2 large health care providers, and American Community Survey data, depression rates were estimated by CT for Denver County, Colorado. Sociodemographic and geographic (residence) attributes were analyzed and described. Spatial analysis assessed for clusters of higher or lower depression prevalence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Depression prevalence estimates by CT. RESULTS: National and local survey-based depression prevalence estimates ranged from 7% to 17% but were limited to county level. Electronic health record data provided subcounty depression prevalence estimates by sociodemographic and geographic groups (CT range: 5%-20%). Overall depression prevalence was 13%; rates were higher for women (16% vs men 9%), whites (16%), and increased with age and homeless patients (18%). Areas of higher and lower EHR-based, depression prevalence were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic health record–based depression prevalence varied by CT, gender, race/ethnicity, age, and living status. Electronic health record–based surveillance complements traditional methods with greater timeliness and granularity. Validation through subcounty-level qualitative or survey approaches should assess accuracy and address concerns about EHR selection bias. Public health agencies should consider the opportunity and evaluate EHR system data as a surveillance tool to estimate subcounty chronic disease prevalence. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2018-11 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6170150/ /pubmed/29334514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000751 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Davidson, Arthur J.
Xu, Stanley
Oronce, Carlos Irwin A.
Durfee, M. Josh
McCormick, Emily V.
Steiner, John F.
Havranek, Edward
Beck, Arne
Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records
title Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records
title_full Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records
title_fullStr Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records
title_short Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records
title_sort monitoring depression rates in an urban community: use of electronic health records
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6170150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000751
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsonarthurj monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords
AT xustanley monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords
AT oroncecarlosirwina monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords
AT durfeemjosh monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords
AT mccormickemilyv monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords
AT steinerjohnf monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords
AT havranekedward monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords
AT beckarne monitoringdepressionratesinanurbancommunityuseofelectronichealthrecords