Cargando…

Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis

There is a great deal of variability in the composition of neuropsychological test batteries used in the assessment of cancerrelated cognitive impairment (CRCI). Not only the development of a gold standard approach for CRCI assessment would allow for easier identification of women suffering from CRC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambert, Maude, Ouimet, Lea Ann, Wan, Cynthia, Stewart, Angela, Collins, Barbara, Vitoroulis, Irene, Bielajew, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6170883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294410
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2018.371
_version_ 1783360705483767808
author Lambert, Maude
Ouimet, Lea Ann
Wan, Cynthia
Stewart, Angela
Collins, Barbara
Vitoroulis, Irene
Bielajew, Catherine
author_facet Lambert, Maude
Ouimet, Lea Ann
Wan, Cynthia
Stewart, Angela
Collins, Barbara
Vitoroulis, Irene
Bielajew, Catherine
author_sort Lambert, Maude
collection PubMed
description There is a great deal of variability in the composition of neuropsychological test batteries used in the assessment of cancerrelated cognitive impairment (CRCI). Not only the development of a gold standard approach for CRCI assessment would allow for easier identification of women suffering from CRCI but it would also promote optimal care for survivors. As a first step towards the development of a valid and reliable unified test battery, the objective of this study was to verify whether the theoretical domains commonly used in CRCI assessment are statistically supported, before and after breast cancer treatment. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed on the results from 23 neuropsychological tests grouped into eight conceptual domains. For baseline data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .82 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 949.48, P<0.001. A five-component solution explained 60.94% of the common variance. For the post-treatment data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .83 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 1007.21, P<0.001 and a five component solution explained 62.03% of the common variance. Although a visual comparison of the theoretical model with those determined via PCA indicated important overlap between conceptual domains and statistical components, significant dissimilarities were also observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6170883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61708832018-10-05 Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis Lambert, Maude Ouimet, Lea Ann Wan, Cynthia Stewart, Angela Collins, Barbara Vitoroulis, Irene Bielajew, Catherine Oncol Rev Review There is a great deal of variability in the composition of neuropsychological test batteries used in the assessment of cancerrelated cognitive impairment (CRCI). Not only the development of a gold standard approach for CRCI assessment would allow for easier identification of women suffering from CRCI but it would also promote optimal care for survivors. As a first step towards the development of a valid and reliable unified test battery, the objective of this study was to verify whether the theoretical domains commonly used in CRCI assessment are statistically supported, before and after breast cancer treatment. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed on the results from 23 neuropsychological tests grouped into eight conceptual domains. For baseline data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .82 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 949.48, P<0.001. A five-component solution explained 60.94% of the common variance. For the post-treatment data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .83 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 1007.21, P<0.001 and a five component solution explained 62.03% of the common variance. Although a visual comparison of the theoretical model with those determined via PCA indicated important overlap between conceptual domains and statistical components, significant dissimilarities were also observed. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6170883/ /pubmed/30294410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2018.371 Text en ©Copyright M. Lambert et al., 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Review
Lambert, Maude
Ouimet, Lea Ann
Wan, Cynthia
Stewart, Angela
Collins, Barbara
Vitoroulis, Irene
Bielajew, Catherine
Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
title Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
title_full Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
title_fullStr Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
title_short Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
title_sort cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: an examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6170883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294410
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2018.371
work_keys_str_mv AT lambertmaude cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT ouimetleaann cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT wancynthia cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT stewartangela cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT collinsbarbara cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT vitoroulisirene cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT bielajewcatherine cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis