Cargando…
Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis
There is a great deal of variability in the composition of neuropsychological test batteries used in the assessment of cancerrelated cognitive impairment (CRCI). Not only the development of a gold standard approach for CRCI assessment would allow for easier identification of women suffering from CRC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6170883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2018.371 |
_version_ | 1783360705483767808 |
---|---|
author | Lambert, Maude Ouimet, Lea Ann Wan, Cynthia Stewart, Angela Collins, Barbara Vitoroulis, Irene Bielajew, Catherine |
author_facet | Lambert, Maude Ouimet, Lea Ann Wan, Cynthia Stewart, Angela Collins, Barbara Vitoroulis, Irene Bielajew, Catherine |
author_sort | Lambert, Maude |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a great deal of variability in the composition of neuropsychological test batteries used in the assessment of cancerrelated cognitive impairment (CRCI). Not only the development of a gold standard approach for CRCI assessment would allow for easier identification of women suffering from CRCI but it would also promote optimal care for survivors. As a first step towards the development of a valid and reliable unified test battery, the objective of this study was to verify whether the theoretical domains commonly used in CRCI assessment are statistically supported, before and after breast cancer treatment. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed on the results from 23 neuropsychological tests grouped into eight conceptual domains. For baseline data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .82 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 949.48, P<0.001. A five-component solution explained 60.94% of the common variance. For the post-treatment data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .83 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 1007.21, P<0.001 and a five component solution explained 62.03% of the common variance. Although a visual comparison of the theoretical model with those determined via PCA indicated important overlap between conceptual domains and statistical components, significant dissimilarities were also observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6170883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61708832018-10-05 Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis Lambert, Maude Ouimet, Lea Ann Wan, Cynthia Stewart, Angela Collins, Barbara Vitoroulis, Irene Bielajew, Catherine Oncol Rev Review There is a great deal of variability in the composition of neuropsychological test batteries used in the assessment of cancerrelated cognitive impairment (CRCI). Not only the development of a gold standard approach for CRCI assessment would allow for easier identification of women suffering from CRCI but it would also promote optimal care for survivors. As a first step towards the development of a valid and reliable unified test battery, the objective of this study was to verify whether the theoretical domains commonly used in CRCI assessment are statistically supported, before and after breast cancer treatment. Principal component analyses (PCA) were performed on the results from 23 neuropsychological tests grouped into eight conceptual domains. For baseline data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .82 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 949.48, P<0.001. A five-component solution explained 60.94% of the common variance. For the post-treatment data, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was .83 and Bartlett’s X(2)(253, N=95) = 1007.21, P<0.001 and a five component solution explained 62.03% of the common variance. Although a visual comparison of the theoretical model with those determined via PCA indicated important overlap between conceptual domains and statistical components, significant dissimilarities were also observed. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6170883/ /pubmed/30294410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2018.371 Text en ©Copyright M. Lambert et al., 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Review Lambert, Maude Ouimet, Lea Ann Wan, Cynthia Stewart, Angela Collins, Barbara Vitoroulis, Irene Bielajew, Catherine Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis |
title | Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis |
title_full | Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis |
title_fullStr | Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis |
title_short | Cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: An examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis |
title_sort | cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: an examination of conceptual and statistical cognitive domains using principal component analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6170883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/oncol.2018.371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambertmaude cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT ouimetleaann cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT wancynthia cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT stewartangela cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT collinsbarbara cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT vitoroulisirene cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis AT bielajewcatherine cancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentinbreastcancersurvivorsanexaminationofconceptualandstatisticalcognitivedomainsusingprincipalcomponentanalysis |