Cargando…
Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study
BACKGROUND: The peanut ball has only been recently used as a support for women labouring with epidurals. The peanut ball is shaped like a peanut and fits snugly between the woman’s legs so that both legs are maintained as opening the pelvic outlet to increase the progress of labour and facilitate de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0346-9 |
_version_ | 1783360734492622848 |
---|---|
author | Stulz, Virginia Campbell, David Yin, Biing Al Omari, Wafa Burr, Robin Reilly, Heather Lawson, Kenny |
author_facet | Stulz, Virginia Campbell, David Yin, Biing Al Omari, Wafa Burr, Robin Reilly, Heather Lawson, Kenny |
author_sort | Stulz, Virginia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The peanut ball has only been recently used as a support for women labouring with epidurals. The peanut ball is shaped like a peanut and fits snugly between the woman’s legs so that both legs are maintained as opening the pelvic outlet to increase the progress of labour and facilitate descent of the fetal head. Using position changes during labour to enhance widening of the pelvic outlet can be beneficial but a woman who has an epidural is limited in the number of positions she can adopt. No randomised controlled trial has been implemented in Australia to establish the effectiveness of a peanut ball specifically for women using epidurals during labour, and this project addresses this gap. The main aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and practicality of conducting and replicating this trial to a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: A minimum number of 50 women (25 in each trial arm), who are using an epidural in labour at two hospitals in NSW over a 1-year period, will be recruited and randomly allocated into a group that uses the peanut ball or into a group that does not use the peanut ball. Primary study objectives include assessing the proportion of women willing to be randomised, retention/attrition rates, and with associated reasons. Data will be collected on key clinical outcomes (natural birth rate, length of stay) with means and variances estimated between trial arms. This will inform the appropriate powering of a future definitive RCT. Secondary study objectives will include investigating the completion and acceptability of health and satisfaction surveys and assess the feasibility of conducting an economic evaluation alongside a future trial. DISCUSSION: This is a two-armed randomised controlled pilot trial. Outcomes from this pilot will inform a larger trial at a tertiary hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000662268 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0346-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6171141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61711412018-10-10 Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study Stulz, Virginia Campbell, David Yin, Biing Al Omari, Wafa Burr, Robin Reilly, Heather Lawson, Kenny Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The peanut ball has only been recently used as a support for women labouring with epidurals. The peanut ball is shaped like a peanut and fits snugly between the woman’s legs so that both legs are maintained as opening the pelvic outlet to increase the progress of labour and facilitate descent of the fetal head. Using position changes during labour to enhance widening of the pelvic outlet can be beneficial but a woman who has an epidural is limited in the number of positions she can adopt. No randomised controlled trial has been implemented in Australia to establish the effectiveness of a peanut ball specifically for women using epidurals during labour, and this project addresses this gap. The main aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and practicality of conducting and replicating this trial to a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: A minimum number of 50 women (25 in each trial arm), who are using an epidural in labour at two hospitals in NSW over a 1-year period, will be recruited and randomly allocated into a group that uses the peanut ball or into a group that does not use the peanut ball. Primary study objectives include assessing the proportion of women willing to be randomised, retention/attrition rates, and with associated reasons. Data will be collected on key clinical outcomes (natural birth rate, length of stay) with means and variances estimated between trial arms. This will inform the appropriate powering of a future definitive RCT. Secondary study objectives will include investigating the completion and acceptability of health and satisfaction surveys and assess the feasibility of conducting an economic evaluation alongside a future trial. DISCUSSION: This is a two-armed randomised controlled pilot trial. Outcomes from this pilot will inform a larger trial at a tertiary hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000662268 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-018-0346-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6171141/ /pubmed/30305919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0346-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Stulz, Virginia Campbell, David Yin, Biing Al Omari, Wafa Burr, Robin Reilly, Heather Lawson, Kenny Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study |
title | Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_full | Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_fullStr | Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_short | Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study |
title_sort | using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0346-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stulzvirginia usingapeanutballduringlabourversusnotusingapeanutballduringlabourforwomenusinganepiduralstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT campbelldavid usingapeanutballduringlabourversusnotusingapeanutballduringlabourforwomenusinganepiduralstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT yinbiing usingapeanutballduringlabourversusnotusingapeanutballduringlabourforwomenusinganepiduralstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT alomariwafa usingapeanutballduringlabourversusnotusingapeanutballduringlabourforwomenusinganepiduralstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT burrrobin usingapeanutballduringlabourversusnotusingapeanutballduringlabourforwomenusinganepiduralstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT reillyheather usingapeanutballduringlabourversusnotusingapeanutballduringlabourforwomenusinganepiduralstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy AT lawsonkenny usingapeanutballduringlabourversusnotusingapeanutballduringlabourforwomenusinganepiduralstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledpilotstudy |