Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in using negative pressure wound therapy in closed surgical incision to prevent wound complications which continue to persist following surgery despite advances in infection measures. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of single use negative pressu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nherera, Leo M, Trueman, Paul, Schmoeckel, Michael, Fatoye, Francis A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0786-6
_version_ 1783360742525763584
author Nherera, Leo M
Trueman, Paul
Schmoeckel, Michael
Fatoye, Francis A
author_facet Nherera, Leo M
Trueman, Paul
Schmoeckel, Michael
Fatoye, Francis A
author_sort Nherera, Leo M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in using negative pressure wound therapy in closed surgical incision to prevent wound complications which continue to persist following surgery despite advances in infection measures. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of single use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) procedure to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) defined as dehiscence and sternotomy infections. METHOD: A decision analytic model was developed from the Germany Statutory Health Insurance payer’s perspective over a 12-week time horizon. Baseline data on SSC, revision operations, length of stay, and readmissions were obtained from a prospective observational study of 2621 CABG patients in Germany. Effectiveness data for sNPWT was taken from a randomised open label trial conducted in Poland which randomised 80 patients to treatment with either sNPWT or standard care. Cost data (in Euros) were taken from the relevant diagnostic related groups and published literature. RESULTS: The clinical study reported an increase in wounds that healed without complications 37/40 (92.5%) in the sNPWT compared to 30/40 (75%) patients in the SC group p = 0.03. The model estimated sNPWT resulted in 0.989 complications avoided compared to 0.952 and the estimated quality adjusted life years were 0.8904 and 0.8593 per patient compared to standard care. The estimated mean cost per patient was €19,986 for sNPWT compared to €20,572 for SC resulting in cost-saving of €586. The findings were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The sNPWT can be considered a cost saving intervention that reduces surgical site complications following CABG surgery compared to standard care. We however recommend that additional economic studies should be conducted as new evidence on the use of sNPWT in CABG patients becomes available to validate the results of this economic analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6171177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61711772018-10-10 Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery Nherera, Leo M Trueman, Paul Schmoeckel, Michael Fatoye, Francis A J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in using negative pressure wound therapy in closed surgical incision to prevent wound complications which continue to persist following surgery despite advances in infection measures. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of single use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) procedure to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) defined as dehiscence and sternotomy infections. METHOD: A decision analytic model was developed from the Germany Statutory Health Insurance payer’s perspective over a 12-week time horizon. Baseline data on SSC, revision operations, length of stay, and readmissions were obtained from a prospective observational study of 2621 CABG patients in Germany. Effectiveness data for sNPWT was taken from a randomised open label trial conducted in Poland which randomised 80 patients to treatment with either sNPWT or standard care. Cost data (in Euros) were taken from the relevant diagnostic related groups and published literature. RESULTS: The clinical study reported an increase in wounds that healed without complications 37/40 (92.5%) in the sNPWT compared to 30/40 (75%) patients in the SC group p = 0.03. The model estimated sNPWT resulted in 0.989 complications avoided compared to 0.952 and the estimated quality adjusted life years were 0.8904 and 0.8593 per patient compared to standard care. The estimated mean cost per patient was €19,986 for sNPWT compared to €20,572 for SC resulting in cost-saving of €586. The findings were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The sNPWT can be considered a cost saving intervention that reduces surgical site complications following CABG surgery compared to standard care. We however recommend that additional economic studies should be conducted as new evidence on the use of sNPWT in CABG patients becomes available to validate the results of this economic analysis. BioMed Central 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6171177/ /pubmed/30285811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0786-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nherera, Leo M
Trueman, Paul
Schmoeckel, Michael
Fatoye, Francis A
Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (SSC) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of single use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (snpwt) compared to standard of care in reducing surgical site complications (ssc) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0786-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nhereraleom costeffectivenessanalysisofsingleusenegativepressurewoundtherapydressingssnpwtcomparedtostandardofcareinreducingsurgicalsitecomplicationssscinpatientsundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftingsurgery
AT truemanpaul costeffectivenessanalysisofsingleusenegativepressurewoundtherapydressingssnpwtcomparedtostandardofcareinreducingsurgicalsitecomplicationssscinpatientsundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftingsurgery
AT schmoeckelmichael costeffectivenessanalysisofsingleusenegativepressurewoundtherapydressingssnpwtcomparedtostandardofcareinreducingsurgicalsitecomplicationssscinpatientsundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftingsurgery
AT fatoyefrancisa costeffectivenessanalysisofsingleusenegativepressurewoundtherapydressingssnpwtcomparedtostandardofcareinreducingsurgicalsitecomplicationssscinpatientsundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftingsurgery