Cargando…

Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, administration of high concentrations of oxygen may cause hypercapnia and increase mortality compared with oxygen titrated, if required, to achieve an oxygen saturation of 88–92%. Optimally titrated oxygen regimens require two co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bardsley, George, Pilcher, Janine, McKinstry, Steven, Shirtcliffe, Philippa, Berry, James, Fingleton, James, Weatherall, Mark, Beasley, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0720-7
_version_ 1783360746323705856
author Bardsley, George
Pilcher, Janine
McKinstry, Steven
Shirtcliffe, Philippa
Berry, James
Fingleton, James
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
author_facet Bardsley, George
Pilcher, Janine
McKinstry, Steven
Shirtcliffe, Philippa
Berry, James
Fingleton, James
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
author_sort Bardsley, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, administration of high concentrations of oxygen may cause hypercapnia and increase mortality compared with oxygen titrated, if required, to achieve an oxygen saturation of 88–92%. Optimally titrated oxygen regimens require two components: titrated supplemental oxygen to achieve the target oxygen saturation and, if required, bronchodilators delivered by air-driven nebulisation. The effect of repeated air vs oxygen-driven bronchodilator nebulisation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of air versus oxygen-driven bronchodilator nebulisation on arterial carbon dioxide tension in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: A parallel group double-blind randomised controlled trial in 90 hospital in-patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Participants were randomised to receive two 2.5 mg salbutamol nebulisers, both driven by air or oxygen at 8 L/min, each delivered over 15 min with a 5 min interval in-between. The primary outcome measure was the transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of the second nebulisation (35 min). The primary analysis used a mixed linear model with fixed effects of the baseline PtCO(2), time, the randomised intervention, and a time by intervention interaction term; to estimate the difference between randomised treatments at 35 min. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Oxygen-driven nebulisation was terminated in one participant after 27 min when the PtCO(2) rose by > 10 mmHg, a predefined safety criterion. The mean (standard deviation) change in PtCO(2) at 35 min was 3.4 (1.9) mmHg and 0.1 (1.4) mmHg in the oxygen and air groups respectively, difference (95% confidence interval) 3.3 mmHg (2.7 to 3.9), p < 0.001. The proportion of patients with a PtCO(2) change ≥4 mmHg during the intervention was 18/45 (40%) and 0/44 (0%) for oxygen and air groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen-driven nebulisation leads to an increase in PtCO(2) in exacerbations of COPD. We propose that air-driven bronchodilator nebulisation is preferable to oxygen-driven nebulisation in exacerbations of COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number ACTRN12615000389505. Registration confirmed on 28/4/15. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-018-0720-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6171193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61711932018-10-10 Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial Bardsley, George Pilcher, Janine McKinstry, Steven Shirtcliffe, Philippa Berry, James Fingleton, James Weatherall, Mark Beasley, Richard BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: In exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, administration of high concentrations of oxygen may cause hypercapnia and increase mortality compared with oxygen titrated, if required, to achieve an oxygen saturation of 88–92%. Optimally titrated oxygen regimens require two components: titrated supplemental oxygen to achieve the target oxygen saturation and, if required, bronchodilators delivered by air-driven nebulisation. The effect of repeated air vs oxygen-driven bronchodilator nebulisation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of air versus oxygen-driven bronchodilator nebulisation on arterial carbon dioxide tension in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: A parallel group double-blind randomised controlled trial in 90 hospital in-patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Participants were randomised to receive two 2.5 mg salbutamol nebulisers, both driven by air or oxygen at 8 L/min, each delivered over 15 min with a 5 min interval in-between. The primary outcome measure was the transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of the second nebulisation (35 min). The primary analysis used a mixed linear model with fixed effects of the baseline PtCO(2), time, the randomised intervention, and a time by intervention interaction term; to estimate the difference between randomised treatments at 35 min. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Oxygen-driven nebulisation was terminated in one participant after 27 min when the PtCO(2) rose by > 10 mmHg, a predefined safety criterion. The mean (standard deviation) change in PtCO(2) at 35 min was 3.4 (1.9) mmHg and 0.1 (1.4) mmHg in the oxygen and air groups respectively, difference (95% confidence interval) 3.3 mmHg (2.7 to 3.9), p < 0.001. The proportion of patients with a PtCO(2) change ≥4 mmHg during the intervention was 18/45 (40%) and 0/44 (0%) for oxygen and air groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen-driven nebulisation leads to an increase in PtCO(2) in exacerbations of COPD. We propose that air-driven bronchodilator nebulisation is preferable to oxygen-driven nebulisation in exacerbations of COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number ACTRN12615000389505. Registration confirmed on 28/4/15. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-018-0720-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6171193/ /pubmed/30285695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0720-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bardsley, George
Pilcher, Janine
McKinstry, Steven
Shirtcliffe, Philippa
Berry, James
Fingleton, James
Weatherall, Mark
Beasley, Richard
Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
title Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort oxygen versus air-driven nebulisers for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0720-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bardsleygeorge oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pilcherjanine oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mckinstrysteven oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shirtcliffephilippa oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT berryjames oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fingletonjames oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weatherallmark oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beasleyrichard oxygenversusairdrivennebulisersforexacerbationsofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomisedcontrolledtrial