Cargando…

Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Variation in access to joint replacement surgery has been widely reported but less attention has been given to the impact of comorbidities on the patient journey to joint replacement surgery. There is a lack of consensus amongst healthcare professionals and commissioners about how patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podmore, Bélène, Hutchings, Andrew, Durand, Mary-Alison, Robson, John, Konan, Sujith, van der Meulen, Jan, Lynch, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3565-0
_version_ 1783360767857262592
author Podmore, Bélène
Hutchings, Andrew
Durand, Mary-Alison
Robson, John
Konan, Sujith
van der Meulen, Jan
Lynch, Rebecca
author_facet Podmore, Bélène
Hutchings, Andrew
Durand, Mary-Alison
Robson, John
Konan, Sujith
van der Meulen, Jan
Lynch, Rebecca
author_sort Podmore, Bélène
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Variation in access to joint replacement surgery has been widely reported but less attention has been given to the impact of comorbidities on the patient journey to joint replacement surgery. There is a lack of consensus amongst healthcare professionals and commissioners about how patients with comorbidities should be referred or selected for joint replacement surgery. It is therefore important to understand the views of healthcare professionals on the management, referral and selection of patients with comorbidities for joint replacement surgery. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals in England across the referral pathway to joint replacement surgery. They were asked to talk about their experiences of referring and selecting patients with comorbidities for joint replacement surgery. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis followed a thematic analysis approach based on the principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: In general, the presence of comorbidities was not seen as a barrier to being referred or selected for joint replacement but was seen as a challenge to manage the patients’ journey across the referral pathway. Each professional group, concentrated on different aspects of the patients’ condition which appeared to affect how they managed patients with comorbidities. This implied there was a disagreement about roles and responsibilities in the management of patients with comorbidities. None of the professionals believed it was their responsibility to address comorbidities in preparation for surgery. This disagreement was identified as a reason why some patients seem to ‘get lost’ in the referral system when they were considered to be unprepared for surgery. Patients were then potentially left to manage their own comorbidities before being reconsidered for joint replacement. CONCLUSIONS: At the clinician-level, comorbidities were not perceived as a barrier to accessing joint replacement surgery but at the pathway-level, it may create an implicit barrier such that patients with comorbidities may get ‘lost’ to the system. Further study is needed to explore the roles and responsibilities of professionals across the current orthopaedic referral pathway which may be less suitable for patients with comorbidities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3565-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6171304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61713042018-10-10 Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study Podmore, Bélène Hutchings, Andrew Durand, Mary-Alison Robson, John Konan, Sujith van der Meulen, Jan Lynch, Rebecca BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Variation in access to joint replacement surgery has been widely reported but less attention has been given to the impact of comorbidities on the patient journey to joint replacement surgery. There is a lack of consensus amongst healthcare professionals and commissioners about how patients with comorbidities should be referred or selected for joint replacement surgery. It is therefore important to understand the views of healthcare professionals on the management, referral and selection of patients with comorbidities for joint replacement surgery. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals in England across the referral pathway to joint replacement surgery. They were asked to talk about their experiences of referring and selecting patients with comorbidities for joint replacement surgery. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis followed a thematic analysis approach based on the principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: In general, the presence of comorbidities was not seen as a barrier to being referred or selected for joint replacement but was seen as a challenge to manage the patients’ journey across the referral pathway. Each professional group, concentrated on different aspects of the patients’ condition which appeared to affect how they managed patients with comorbidities. This implied there was a disagreement about roles and responsibilities in the management of patients with comorbidities. None of the professionals believed it was their responsibility to address comorbidities in preparation for surgery. This disagreement was identified as a reason why some patients seem to ‘get lost’ in the referral system when they were considered to be unprepared for surgery. Patients were then potentially left to manage their own comorbidities before being reconsidered for joint replacement. CONCLUSIONS: At the clinician-level, comorbidities were not perceived as a barrier to accessing joint replacement surgery but at the pathway-level, it may create an implicit barrier such that patients with comorbidities may get ‘lost’ to the system. Further study is needed to explore the roles and responsibilities of professionals across the current orthopaedic referral pathway which may be less suitable for patients with comorbidities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3565-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6171304/ /pubmed/30285847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3565-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Podmore, Bélène
Hutchings, Andrew
Durand, Mary-Alison
Robson, John
Konan, Sujith
van der Meulen, Jan
Lynch, Rebecca
Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study
title Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study
title_full Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study
title_fullStr Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study
title_short Comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study
title_sort comorbidities and the referral pathway to access joint replacement surgery: an exploratory qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3565-0
work_keys_str_mv AT podmorebelene comorbiditiesandthereferralpathwaytoaccessjointreplacementsurgeryanexploratoryqualitativestudy
AT hutchingsandrew comorbiditiesandthereferralpathwaytoaccessjointreplacementsurgeryanexploratoryqualitativestudy
AT durandmaryalison comorbiditiesandthereferralpathwaytoaccessjointreplacementsurgeryanexploratoryqualitativestudy
AT robsonjohn comorbiditiesandthereferralpathwaytoaccessjointreplacementsurgeryanexploratoryqualitativestudy
AT konansujith comorbiditiesandthereferralpathwaytoaccessjointreplacementsurgeryanexploratoryqualitativestudy
AT vandermeulenjan comorbiditiesandthereferralpathwaytoaccessjointreplacementsurgeryanexploratoryqualitativestudy
AT lynchrebecca comorbiditiesandthereferralpathwaytoaccessjointreplacementsurgeryanexploratoryqualitativestudy