Cargando…

A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation

BACKGROUND: Many jurisdictions have enacted indoor tanning legislation in response to the health risks of artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Key components of these legislations include banning minors’ access, requiring parental consent or accompaniment, providing protective eyewear, po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reimann, Jessica, McWhirter, Jennifer E., Papadopoulos, Andrew, Dewey, Cate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4
_version_ 1783360768334364672
author Reimann, Jessica
McWhirter, Jennifer E.
Papadopoulos, Andrew
Dewey, Cate
author_facet Reimann, Jessica
McWhirter, Jennifer E.
Papadopoulos, Andrew
Dewey, Cate
author_sort Reimann, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many jurisdictions have enacted indoor tanning legislation in response to the health risks of artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Key components of these legislations include banning minors’ access, requiring parental consent or accompaniment, providing protective eyewear, posting health warning signs, and communicating important health risk information. However, legislation must be complied with to be impactful. Evidence around compliance with indoor tanning legislations has not been synthesized and is an important step toward determining changes in practice due to legislation. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to obtain peer-reviewed literature about compliance with indoor tanning legislation worldwide. Six databases were searched, resulting in 12,398 citations. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed scientific studies, published in English, focused primarily on compliance with indoor tanning legislations, and focused on commercial indoor tanning in indoor tanning facilities). RESULTS: Compliance with most aspects of indoor tanning legislation varied widely. There was good compliance for provision of protective eyewear (84 to 100%; mean = 92%; SD = 8). Compliance with age restrictions ranged from 0 to 100% (mean = 65%; SD = 25), while compliance with posting warning labels in the required locations within a tanning facility ranged from 8 to 72% (mean = 44%; SD = 27). Variation in compliance may be due to true differences, study methodology, or temporal trends. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in compliance with indoor tanning legislation, as found in this systematic review, indicates the legislations may not be having their intended protective effects on the public’s health. The reasons for such low and varied compliance with certain aspects of legislation, and high compliance with other aspects of legislation, deserve further attention in future research to inform best practices around ensuring high and consistent compliance with indoor tanning legislations worldwide. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6171306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61713062018-10-10 A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation Reimann, Jessica McWhirter, Jennifer E. Papadopoulos, Andrew Dewey, Cate BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Many jurisdictions have enacted indoor tanning legislation in response to the health risks of artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Key components of these legislations include banning minors’ access, requiring parental consent or accompaniment, providing protective eyewear, posting health warning signs, and communicating important health risk information. However, legislation must be complied with to be impactful. Evidence around compliance with indoor tanning legislations has not been synthesized and is an important step toward determining changes in practice due to legislation. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to obtain peer-reviewed literature about compliance with indoor tanning legislation worldwide. Six databases were searched, resulting in 12,398 citations. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed scientific studies, published in English, focused primarily on compliance with indoor tanning legislations, and focused on commercial indoor tanning in indoor tanning facilities). RESULTS: Compliance with most aspects of indoor tanning legislation varied widely. There was good compliance for provision of protective eyewear (84 to 100%; mean = 92%; SD = 8). Compliance with age restrictions ranged from 0 to 100% (mean = 65%; SD = 25), while compliance with posting warning labels in the required locations within a tanning facility ranged from 8 to 72% (mean = 44%; SD = 27). Variation in compliance may be due to true differences, study methodology, or temporal trends. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in compliance with indoor tanning legislation, as found in this systematic review, indicates the legislations may not be having their intended protective effects on the public’s health. The reasons for such low and varied compliance with certain aspects of legislation, and high compliance with other aspects of legislation, deserve further attention in future research to inform best practices around ensuring high and consistent compliance with indoor tanning legislations worldwide. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6171306/ /pubmed/30285702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reimann, Jessica
McWhirter, Jennifer E.
Papadopoulos, Andrew
Dewey, Cate
A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
title A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
title_full A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
title_fullStr A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
title_short A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
title_sort systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reimannjessica asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation
AT mcwhirterjennifere asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation
AT papadopoulosandrew asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation
AT deweycate asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation
AT reimannjessica systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation
AT mcwhirterjennifere systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation
AT papadopoulosandrew systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation
AT deweycate systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation