Cargando…
A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
BACKGROUND: Many jurisdictions have enacted indoor tanning legislation in response to the health risks of artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Key components of these legislations include banning minors’ access, requiring parental consent or accompaniment, providing protective eyewear, po...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4 |
_version_ | 1783360768334364672 |
---|---|
author | Reimann, Jessica McWhirter, Jennifer E. Papadopoulos, Andrew Dewey, Cate |
author_facet | Reimann, Jessica McWhirter, Jennifer E. Papadopoulos, Andrew Dewey, Cate |
author_sort | Reimann, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many jurisdictions have enacted indoor tanning legislation in response to the health risks of artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Key components of these legislations include banning minors’ access, requiring parental consent or accompaniment, providing protective eyewear, posting health warning signs, and communicating important health risk information. However, legislation must be complied with to be impactful. Evidence around compliance with indoor tanning legislations has not been synthesized and is an important step toward determining changes in practice due to legislation. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to obtain peer-reviewed literature about compliance with indoor tanning legislation worldwide. Six databases were searched, resulting in 12,398 citations. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed scientific studies, published in English, focused primarily on compliance with indoor tanning legislations, and focused on commercial indoor tanning in indoor tanning facilities). RESULTS: Compliance with most aspects of indoor tanning legislation varied widely. There was good compliance for provision of protective eyewear (84 to 100%; mean = 92%; SD = 8). Compliance with age restrictions ranged from 0 to 100% (mean = 65%; SD = 25), while compliance with posting warning labels in the required locations within a tanning facility ranged from 8 to 72% (mean = 44%; SD = 27). Variation in compliance may be due to true differences, study methodology, or temporal trends. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in compliance with indoor tanning legislation, as found in this systematic review, indicates the legislations may not be having their intended protective effects on the public’s health. The reasons for such low and varied compliance with certain aspects of legislation, and high compliance with other aspects of legislation, deserve further attention in future research to inform best practices around ensuring high and consistent compliance with indoor tanning legislations worldwide. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6171306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61713062018-10-10 A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation Reimann, Jessica McWhirter, Jennifer E. Papadopoulos, Andrew Dewey, Cate BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Many jurisdictions have enacted indoor tanning legislation in response to the health risks of artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure. Key components of these legislations include banning minors’ access, requiring parental consent or accompaniment, providing protective eyewear, posting health warning signs, and communicating important health risk information. However, legislation must be complied with to be impactful. Evidence around compliance with indoor tanning legislations has not been synthesized and is an important step toward determining changes in practice due to legislation. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to obtain peer-reviewed literature about compliance with indoor tanning legislation worldwide. Six databases were searched, resulting in 12,398 citations. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed scientific studies, published in English, focused primarily on compliance with indoor tanning legislations, and focused on commercial indoor tanning in indoor tanning facilities). RESULTS: Compliance with most aspects of indoor tanning legislation varied widely. There was good compliance for provision of protective eyewear (84 to 100%; mean = 92%; SD = 8). Compliance with age restrictions ranged from 0 to 100% (mean = 65%; SD = 25), while compliance with posting warning labels in the required locations within a tanning facility ranged from 8 to 72% (mean = 44%; SD = 27). Variation in compliance may be due to true differences, study methodology, or temporal trends. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in compliance with indoor tanning legislation, as found in this systematic review, indicates the legislations may not be having their intended protective effects on the public’s health. The reasons for such low and varied compliance with certain aspects of legislation, and high compliance with other aspects of legislation, deserve further attention in future research to inform best practices around ensuring high and consistent compliance with indoor tanning legislations worldwide. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6171306/ /pubmed/30285702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reimann, Jessica McWhirter, Jennifer E. Papadopoulos, Andrew Dewey, Cate A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation |
title | A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation |
title_full | A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation |
title_short | A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation |
title_sort | systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reimannjessica asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation AT mcwhirterjennifere asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation AT papadopoulosandrew asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation AT deweycate asystematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation AT reimannjessica systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation AT mcwhirterjennifere systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation AT papadopoulosandrew systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation AT deweycate systematicreviewofcompliancewithindoortanninglegislation |