Cargando…

The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach

Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Gils, Tom, Senler, Talha G., van der Horst, Henriëtte E., Mulder, Chris J.J., Bouma, Gerd, de Vries, Henk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203
_version_ 1783360796201320448
author van Gils, Tom
Senler, Talha G.
van der Horst, Henriëtte E.
Mulder, Chris J.J.
Bouma, Gerd
de Vries, Henk
author_facet van Gils, Tom
Senler, Talha G.
van der Horst, Henriëtte E.
Mulder, Chris J.J.
Bouma, Gerd
de Vries, Henk
author_sort van Gils, Tom
collection PubMed
description Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative study using topic list-based semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch GPs with more than five years’ experience carried out between January and March 2017. GPs were purposively sampled. The number of GPs interviewed depended on when data saturation was reached. We applied content analysis to the semi-structured interviews. Results: Seven GPs were interviewed, five of whom were female. Analysis of the interviews resulted in three main themes: ‘awareness,’ ‘diagnostics’ and ‘management.’ Vague gastrointestinal symptoms and diarrhoea were often mentioned as a possible presentation of CD. Antibodies were used in CD diagnosis, although some GPs would start a gluten-free diet as a first diagnostic tool. Some GPs diagnosed CD only based on positive antibodies without referring to secondary care or duodenal biopsy analysis. GPs mentioned no role for primary care physicians in the follow-up of CD and noted the important role of dieticians in CD management. Conclusion: The different views of GPs on how to diagnose and monitor CD could be a basis for further research to improve CD detection rate and CD care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6171459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61714592018-10-05 The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach van Gils, Tom Senler, Talha G. van der Horst, Henriëtte E. Mulder, Chris J.J. Bouma, Gerd de Vries, Henk Eur J Gen Pract Original Article Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative study using topic list-based semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch GPs with more than five years’ experience carried out between January and March 2017. GPs were purposively sampled. The number of GPs interviewed depended on when data saturation was reached. We applied content analysis to the semi-structured interviews. Results: Seven GPs were interviewed, five of whom were female. Analysis of the interviews resulted in three main themes: ‘awareness,’ ‘diagnostics’ and ‘management.’ Vague gastrointestinal symptoms and diarrhoea were often mentioned as a possible presentation of CD. Antibodies were used in CD diagnosis, although some GPs would start a gluten-free diet as a first diagnostic tool. Some GPs diagnosed CD only based on positive antibodies without referring to secondary care or duodenal biopsy analysis. GPs mentioned no role for primary care physicians in the follow-up of CD and noted the important role of dieticians in CD management. Conclusion: The different views of GPs on how to diagnose and monitor CD could be a basis for further research to improve CD detection rate and CD care. Taylor & Francis 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6171459/ /pubmed/30277085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
van Gils, Tom
Senler, Talha G.
van der Horst, Henriëtte E.
Mulder, Chris J.J.
Bouma, Gerd
de Vries, Henk
The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_full The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_fullStr The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_full_unstemmed The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_short The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
title_sort daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: a qualitative approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203
work_keys_str_mv AT vangilstom thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT senlertalhag thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT vanderhorsthenriettee thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT mulderchrisjj thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT boumagerd thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT devrieshenk thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT vangilstom dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT senlertalhag dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT vanderhorsthenriettee dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT mulderchrisjj dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT boumagerd dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach
AT devrieshenk dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach