Cargando…
The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach
Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203 |
_version_ | 1783360796201320448 |
---|---|
author | van Gils, Tom Senler, Talha G. van der Horst, Henriëtte E. Mulder, Chris J.J. Bouma, Gerd de Vries, Henk |
author_facet | van Gils, Tom Senler, Talha G. van der Horst, Henriëtte E. Mulder, Chris J.J. Bouma, Gerd de Vries, Henk |
author_sort | van Gils, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative study using topic list-based semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch GPs with more than five years’ experience carried out between January and March 2017. GPs were purposively sampled. The number of GPs interviewed depended on when data saturation was reached. We applied content analysis to the semi-structured interviews. Results: Seven GPs were interviewed, five of whom were female. Analysis of the interviews resulted in three main themes: ‘awareness,’ ‘diagnostics’ and ‘management.’ Vague gastrointestinal symptoms and diarrhoea were often mentioned as a possible presentation of CD. Antibodies were used in CD diagnosis, although some GPs would start a gluten-free diet as a first diagnostic tool. Some GPs diagnosed CD only based on positive antibodies without referring to secondary care or duodenal biopsy analysis. GPs mentioned no role for primary care physicians in the follow-up of CD and noted the important role of dieticians in CD management. Conclusion: The different views of GPs on how to diagnose and monitor CD could be a basis for further research to improve CD detection rate and CD care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6171459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61714592018-10-05 The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach van Gils, Tom Senler, Talha G. van der Horst, Henriëtte E. Mulder, Chris J.J. Bouma, Gerd de Vries, Henk Eur J Gen Pract Original Article Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in diagnosing coeliac disease (CD). However, data on GP management of (suspected) CD patients is sparse. Objectives: To provide insights into the daily practice of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CD by GPs. Methods: A qualitative study using topic list-based semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch GPs with more than five years’ experience carried out between January and March 2017. GPs were purposively sampled. The number of GPs interviewed depended on when data saturation was reached. We applied content analysis to the semi-structured interviews. Results: Seven GPs were interviewed, five of whom were female. Analysis of the interviews resulted in three main themes: ‘awareness,’ ‘diagnostics’ and ‘management.’ Vague gastrointestinal symptoms and diarrhoea were often mentioned as a possible presentation of CD. Antibodies were used in CD diagnosis, although some GPs would start a gluten-free diet as a first diagnostic tool. Some GPs diagnosed CD only based on positive antibodies without referring to secondary care or duodenal biopsy analysis. GPs mentioned no role for primary care physicians in the follow-up of CD and noted the important role of dieticians in CD management. Conclusion: The different views of GPs on how to diagnose and monitor CD could be a basis for further research to improve CD detection rate and CD care. Taylor & Francis 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6171459/ /pubmed/30277085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van Gils, Tom Senler, Talha G. van der Horst, Henriëtte E. Mulder, Chris J.J. Bouma, Gerd de Vries, Henk The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach |
title | The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach |
title_full | The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach |
title_fullStr | The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach |
title_full_unstemmed | The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach |
title_short | The daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: A qualitative approach |
title_sort | daily practice of (suspected) coeliac disease management by general practitioners: a qualitative approach |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1516203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vangilstom thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT senlertalhag thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT vanderhorsthenriettee thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT mulderchrisjj thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT boumagerd thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT devrieshenk thedailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT vangilstom dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT senlertalhag dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT vanderhorsthenriettee dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT mulderchrisjj dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT boumagerd dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach AT devrieshenk dailypracticeofsuspectedcoeliacdiseasemanagementbygeneralpractitionersaqualitativeapproach |