Cargando…
Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.
Background: Decisions about which applications to fund are generally based on the mean scores of a panel of peer reviewers. As well as the mean, a large disagreement between peer reviewers may also be worth considering, as it may indicate a high-risk application with a high return. Methods: We exami...
Autores principales: | Barnett, Adrian G., Glisson, Scott R., Gallo, Stephen |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345025 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15479.2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Tripp, John H, et al.
Publicado: (1995) -
Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Hotopf, Matthew
Publicado: (1995) -
Disagreeing in context
por: Marques, Teresa
Publicado: (2015)