Cargando…

Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding

Wetland loss and degradation have been extensive across the world, especially in California’s Central Valley where over 90% of the natural wetlands have been converted to agricultural and urban uses. In the Central Valley today, a much smaller network of managed wetlands and flooded agricultural fie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sesser, Kristin A., Iglecia, Monica, Reiter, Matthew E., Strum, Khara M., Hickey, Catherine M., Kelsey, Rodd, Skalos, Daniel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30286116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204800
_version_ 1783360844465176576
author Sesser, Kristin A.
Iglecia, Monica
Reiter, Matthew E.
Strum, Khara M.
Hickey, Catherine M.
Kelsey, Rodd
Skalos, Daniel A.
author_facet Sesser, Kristin A.
Iglecia, Monica
Reiter, Matthew E.
Strum, Khara M.
Hickey, Catherine M.
Kelsey, Rodd
Skalos, Daniel A.
author_sort Sesser, Kristin A.
collection PubMed
description Wetland loss and degradation have been extensive across the world, especially in California’s Central Valley where over 90% of the natural wetlands have been converted to agricultural and urban uses. In the Central Valley today, a much smaller network of managed wetlands and flooded agricultural fields supports almost five million waterfowl and half a million shorebirds. Over 50% of waterbird habitat in the Central Valley is provided by flooded agricultural land, primarily rice (Oryza sativa). Each year non-breeding waterbird habitat decreases in the late winter as flooded agricultural fields are drained after waterfowl hunting season in late-January to prepare for the next crop. This study evaluated a practice called ‘variable drawdown’ that involves delaying the removal of water from rice fields by 1, 2, and 3 weeks to extend the availability of flooded habitat later into February and March. We studied waterbird response to variable drawdown in 2012 and 2013 at twenty rice farms throughout the northern half of the Central Valley. The staggered drawdown created a mosaic of water depths throughout the six-week study period. The 3-week delay in drawdown supported more dabbling ducks than earlier drawdowns in the first half of the study and more shorebirds and long-legged wading birds during the second half of the study. The timing of highest use of each drawdown treatment differed for each waterbird guild; dabbling ducks, geese and swans benefited at the beginning, then long-legged wading birds, followed by shorebirds. Despite the presence of appropriate water depths for shorebirds across the treatments during the entire study period, shorebird densities were highest near the end of the study when the 3-week-delayed drawdown was providing the majority of the habitat on the landscape. This suggests that shorebirds may have concentrated in our study fields due to decreasing availability of shallow water habitat elsewhere. The practice of variable drawdown successfully extended the availability of waterbird habitat provided by post-harvest flooded rice fields later into winter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6171887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61718872018-10-19 Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding Sesser, Kristin A. Iglecia, Monica Reiter, Matthew E. Strum, Khara M. Hickey, Catherine M. Kelsey, Rodd Skalos, Daniel A. PLoS One Research Article Wetland loss and degradation have been extensive across the world, especially in California’s Central Valley where over 90% of the natural wetlands have been converted to agricultural and urban uses. In the Central Valley today, a much smaller network of managed wetlands and flooded agricultural fields supports almost five million waterfowl and half a million shorebirds. Over 50% of waterbird habitat in the Central Valley is provided by flooded agricultural land, primarily rice (Oryza sativa). Each year non-breeding waterbird habitat decreases in the late winter as flooded agricultural fields are drained after waterfowl hunting season in late-January to prepare for the next crop. This study evaluated a practice called ‘variable drawdown’ that involves delaying the removal of water from rice fields by 1, 2, and 3 weeks to extend the availability of flooded habitat later into February and March. We studied waterbird response to variable drawdown in 2012 and 2013 at twenty rice farms throughout the northern half of the Central Valley. The staggered drawdown created a mosaic of water depths throughout the six-week study period. The 3-week delay in drawdown supported more dabbling ducks than earlier drawdowns in the first half of the study and more shorebirds and long-legged wading birds during the second half of the study. The timing of highest use of each drawdown treatment differed for each waterbird guild; dabbling ducks, geese and swans benefited at the beginning, then long-legged wading birds, followed by shorebirds. Despite the presence of appropriate water depths for shorebirds across the treatments during the entire study period, shorebird densities were highest near the end of the study when the 3-week-delayed drawdown was providing the majority of the habitat on the landscape. This suggests that shorebirds may have concentrated in our study fields due to decreasing availability of shallow water habitat elsewhere. The practice of variable drawdown successfully extended the availability of waterbird habitat provided by post-harvest flooded rice fields later into winter. Public Library of Science 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6171887/ /pubmed/30286116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204800 Text en © 2018 Sesser et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sesser, Kristin A.
Iglecia, Monica
Reiter, Matthew E.
Strum, Khara M.
Hickey, Catherine M.
Kelsey, Rodd
Skalos, Daniel A.
Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding
title Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding
title_full Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding
title_fullStr Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding
title_full_unstemmed Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding
title_short Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding
title_sort waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6171887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30286116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204800
work_keys_str_mv AT sesserkristina waterbirdresponsetovariabletimingofdrawdowninricefieldsafterwinterflooding
AT igleciamonica waterbirdresponsetovariabletimingofdrawdowninricefieldsafterwinterflooding
AT reitermatthewe waterbirdresponsetovariabletimingofdrawdowninricefieldsafterwinterflooding
AT strumkharam waterbirdresponsetovariabletimingofdrawdowninricefieldsafterwinterflooding
AT hickeycatherinem waterbirdresponsetovariabletimingofdrawdowninricefieldsafterwinterflooding
AT kelseyrodd waterbirdresponsetovariabletimingofdrawdowninricefieldsafterwinterflooding
AT skalosdaniela waterbirdresponsetovariabletimingofdrawdowninricefieldsafterwinterflooding