Cargando…

Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of volumetric reconstruction of the pharynx by comparing the volume and minimum crosssectional area (mCSA) determined with open-source applications (ITK-Snap, www.itksnap.org ; SlicerCMF) and commercial software (Dolphin3D, 11.8, Dolphin Im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro, Yatabe, Marília, Ioshida, Marcos, Orlandi, Luan, de Dumast, Priscille, Trindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30304121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0282
_version_ 1783360868023533568
author Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro
Yatabe, Marília
Ioshida, Marcos
Orlandi, Luan
de Dumast, Priscille
Trindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle
author_facet Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro
Yatabe, Marília
Ioshida, Marcos
Orlandi, Luan
de Dumast, Priscille
Trindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle
author_sort Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of volumetric reconstruction of the pharynx by comparing the volume and minimum crosssectional area (mCSA) determined with open-source applications (ITK-Snap, www.itksnap.org ; SlicerCMF) and commercial software (Dolphin3D, 11.8, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA) previously validated in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample comprised of 35 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, with mean age of 29±15. Three-dimensional volumetric models of the pharynx were reconstructed using semi-automatic segmentation using the applications ITK-Snap (G1) and Dolphin3D (G2). Volumes and minimum cross-sectional areas were determined. Inter- and intra-observer error were calculated using ICC test. Comparison between applications was calculated using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Volumes and minimum crosssectional area were statistically similar between applications. ITK-Snap showed higher pharynx volumes, but lower mCSA. Visual assessment showed that 62.86% matched the region of mCSA in Dolphin3D and SPHARM-PDM. CONCLUSION: Measurements of volume and mCSA are statistically similar between applications. Therefore, open-source applications may be a viable option to assess upper airway dimensions using CBCT exams.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6172025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61720252018-10-25 Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro Yatabe, Marília Ioshida, Marcos Orlandi, Luan de Dumast, Priscille Trindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle J Appl Oral Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of volumetric reconstruction of the pharynx by comparing the volume and minimum crosssectional area (mCSA) determined with open-source applications (ITK-Snap, www.itksnap.org ; SlicerCMF) and commercial software (Dolphin3D, 11.8, Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA) previously validated in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample comprised of 35 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, with mean age of 29±15. Three-dimensional volumetric models of the pharynx were reconstructed using semi-automatic segmentation using the applications ITK-Snap (G1) and Dolphin3D (G2). Volumes and minimum cross-sectional areas were determined. Inter- and intra-observer error were calculated using ICC test. Comparison between applications was calculated using the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Volumes and minimum crosssectional area were statistically similar between applications. ITK-Snap showed higher pharynx volumes, but lower mCSA. Visual assessment showed that 62.86% matched the region of mCSA in Dolphin3D and SPHARM-PDM. CONCLUSION: Measurements of volume and mCSA are statistically similar between applications. Therefore, open-source applications may be a viable option to assess upper airway dimensions using CBCT exams. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2018-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6172025/ /pubmed/30304121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0282 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pinheiro, Maycon Lázaro
Yatabe, Marília
Ioshida, Marcos
Orlandi, Luan
de Dumast, Priscille
Trindade-Suedam, Ivy Kiemle
Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
title Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
title_full Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
title_fullStr Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
title_short Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
title_sort volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30304121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0282
work_keys_str_mv AT pinheiromayconlazaro volumetricreconstructionanddeterminationofminimumcrosssectionalareaofthepharynxinpatientswithcleftlipandpalatecomparisonbetweentwodifferentsoftwares
AT yatabemarilia volumetricreconstructionanddeterminationofminimumcrosssectionalareaofthepharynxinpatientswithcleftlipandpalatecomparisonbetweentwodifferentsoftwares
AT ioshidamarcos volumetricreconstructionanddeterminationofminimumcrosssectionalareaofthepharynxinpatientswithcleftlipandpalatecomparisonbetweentwodifferentsoftwares
AT orlandiluan volumetricreconstructionanddeterminationofminimumcrosssectionalareaofthepharynxinpatientswithcleftlipandpalatecomparisonbetweentwodifferentsoftwares
AT dedumastpriscille volumetricreconstructionanddeterminationofminimumcrosssectionalareaofthepharynxinpatientswithcleftlipandpalatecomparisonbetweentwodifferentsoftwares
AT trindadesuedamivykiemle volumetricreconstructionanddeterminationofminimumcrosssectionalareaofthepharynxinpatientswithcleftlipandpalatecomparisonbetweentwodifferentsoftwares