Cargando…

Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND: Tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy is a safe, highly effective, and permanent way to limit childbearing. We aimed to establish whether the safety of the procedure provided by trained clinical officers (COs) was not inferior to the safety when provided by trained assistant medical officers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barone, Mark A., Mbuguni, Zuhura, Achola, Japhet Ominde, Almeida, Annette, Cordero, Carmela, Kanama, Joseph, Marquina, Adriana, Muganyizi, Projestine, Mwanga, Jamilla, Ouma, Daniel, Shannon, Caitlin, Tibyehabwa, Leopold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120168
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00108
_version_ 1783360883181748224
author Barone, Mark A.
Mbuguni, Zuhura
Achola, Japhet Ominde
Almeida, Annette
Cordero, Carmela
Kanama, Joseph
Marquina, Adriana
Muganyizi, Projestine
Mwanga, Jamilla
Ouma, Daniel
Shannon, Caitlin
Tibyehabwa, Leopold
author_facet Barone, Mark A.
Mbuguni, Zuhura
Achola, Japhet Ominde
Almeida, Annette
Cordero, Carmela
Kanama, Joseph
Marquina, Adriana
Muganyizi, Projestine
Mwanga, Jamilla
Ouma, Daniel
Shannon, Caitlin
Tibyehabwa, Leopold
author_sort Barone, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy is a safe, highly effective, and permanent way to limit childbearing. We aimed to establish whether the safety of the procedure provided by trained clinical officers (COs) was not inferior to the safety when provided by trained assistant medical officers (AMOs), as measured by major adverse event (AE) rates. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, open-label noninferiority trial, we enrolled participants at 7 health facilities in Arusha region, Tanzania, as well as during outreach activities conducted in Arusha and neighboring regions. Consenting, eligible participants were randomly allocated by a research assistant at each site to minilaparotomy performed by a trained CO or by a trained AMO, in a 1:1 ratio. We asked participants to return at 3, 7, and 42 days postsurgery. The primary outcome was the rate of major AEs following minilaparotomy performed by COs versus AMOs, during the procedure and through 42 days follow-up. The noninferiority margin was 2%. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT02944149. RESULTS: We randomly allocated 1,970 participants between December 2016 and June 2017, 984 to the CO group and 986 to the AMO group. Most (87%) minilaparotomies were conducted during outreach services. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 0 of 978 participants had a major AE in the CO group compared with 1 (0.1%) of 984 in the AMO group (risk difference: –0.1% [95% confidence interval: –0.3% to 0.1%]), meeting the criteria for noninferiority. We saw no evidence of differences in measures of procedure performance, participant satisfaction, or provider self-efficacy between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy performed by trained COs is safe, effective, and acceptable to women, and the procedure can be safely and effectively provided in outreach settings. Our results provide evidence to support policy change in resource-limited settings to allow task shifting of minilaparotomy to properly trained and supported COs, increasing access to female sterilization and helping to meet the rising demand for the procedure among women wanting to avoid pregnancy. They also suggest high demand for these services in Tanzania, given the large number of women recruited in a relatively short time period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6172133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61721332018-10-21 Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial Barone, Mark A. Mbuguni, Zuhura Achola, Japhet Ominde Almeida, Annette Cordero, Carmela Kanama, Joseph Marquina, Adriana Muganyizi, Projestine Mwanga, Jamilla Ouma, Daniel Shannon, Caitlin Tibyehabwa, Leopold Glob Health Sci Pract Original Articles BACKGROUND: Tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy is a safe, highly effective, and permanent way to limit childbearing. We aimed to establish whether the safety of the procedure provided by trained clinical officers (COs) was not inferior to the safety when provided by trained assistant medical officers (AMOs), as measured by major adverse event (AE) rates. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, open-label noninferiority trial, we enrolled participants at 7 health facilities in Arusha region, Tanzania, as well as during outreach activities conducted in Arusha and neighboring regions. Consenting, eligible participants were randomly allocated by a research assistant at each site to minilaparotomy performed by a trained CO or by a trained AMO, in a 1:1 ratio. We asked participants to return at 3, 7, and 42 days postsurgery. The primary outcome was the rate of major AEs following minilaparotomy performed by COs versus AMOs, during the procedure and through 42 days follow-up. The noninferiority margin was 2%. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT02944149. RESULTS: We randomly allocated 1,970 participants between December 2016 and June 2017, 984 to the CO group and 986 to the AMO group. Most (87%) minilaparotomies were conducted during outreach services. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 0 of 978 participants had a major AE in the CO group compared with 1 (0.1%) of 984 in the AMO group (risk difference: –0.1% [95% confidence interval: –0.3% to 0.1%]), meeting the criteria for noninferiority. We saw no evidence of differences in measures of procedure performance, participant satisfaction, or provider self-efficacy between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy performed by trained COs is safe, effective, and acceptable to women, and the procedure can be safely and effectively provided in outreach settings. Our results provide evidence to support policy change in resource-limited settings to allow task shifting of minilaparotomy to properly trained and supported COs, increasing access to female sterilization and helping to meet the rising demand for the procedure among women wanting to avoid pregnancy. They also suggest high demand for these services in Tanzania, given the large number of women recruited in a relatively short time period. Global Health: Science and Practice 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6172133/ /pubmed/30120168 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00108 Text en © Barone et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00108
spellingShingle Original Articles
Barone, Mark A.
Mbuguni, Zuhura
Achola, Japhet Ominde
Almeida, Annette
Cordero, Carmela
Kanama, Joseph
Marquina, Adriana
Muganyizi, Projestine
Mwanga, Jamilla
Ouma, Daniel
Shannon, Caitlin
Tibyehabwa, Leopold
Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
title Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
title_full Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
title_fullStr Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
title_short Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
title_sort safety of tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy provided by trained clinical officers versus assistant medical officers in tanzania: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120168
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00108
work_keys_str_mv AT baronemarka safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT mbugunizuhura safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT acholajaphetominde safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT almeidaannette safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT corderocarmela safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT kanamajoseph safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT marquinaadriana safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT muganyiziprojestine safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT mwangajamilla safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT oumadaniel safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT shannoncaitlin safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT tibyehabwaleopold safetyoftubalocclusionbyminilaparotomyprovidedbytrainedclinicalofficersversusassistantmedicalofficersintanzaniaarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial