Cargando…

Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial

BACKGROUND: This process evaluation article describes the lessons learned from a failed trial which aimed to assess effectiveness of the tailor-made, multidisciplinary Social Fitness Programme to improve social participation of community-dwelling older people with cognitive problems (clients) and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donkers, H W, Van der Veen, D J, Teerenstra, S, Vernooij-Dassen, M J, Nijhuis-vander Sanden, M W G, Graff, M J L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30286714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0927-8
_version_ 1783360996555882496
author Donkers, H W
Van der Veen, D J
Teerenstra, S
Vernooij-Dassen, M J
Nijhuis-vander Sanden, M W G
Graff, M J L
author_facet Donkers, H W
Van der Veen, D J
Teerenstra, S
Vernooij-Dassen, M J
Nijhuis-vander Sanden, M W G
Graff, M J L
author_sort Donkers, H W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This process evaluation article describes the lessons learned from a failed trial which aimed to assess effectiveness of the tailor-made, multidisciplinary Social Fitness Programme to improve social participation of community-dwelling older people with cognitive problems (clients) and their caregivers (couples). METHODS: A process evaluation was performed to get insight in 1) the implementation of the intervention, 2) the context of intervention delivery from professionals’ point of view, and 3) the potential impact of intervention delivery from participants’ perspectives. Data was gathered using mixed-methods: questionnaires, focus group discussions, interviews, medical records. RESULTS: 1) Implementation. High study decline (65,3%) was mainly caused by a lack of internal motivation to increase social participation expressed by clients. 17 couples participated, however, intervention delivery was insufficient. 2) Context. Barriers during intervention delivery were most often related to client (changing needs), caregiver (increased burden) and health professional factors (delivery of integrated care lacked routine). 3) Impact Qualitative analyses revealed participants to be satisfied with intervention delivery, we were unable to capture these results through our primary outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation revealed the Social Fitness study did not fit in three ways. First, framing the intervention on social participation promotion was as threatening to clients. The feeling of being unable to adequately contribute to social interactions seemed to be causing embarrassment. Second, the intervention seemed to be too complex to implement in the way it was designed. Third, there is a tension between the offering of a personalised tailor-made intervention and evaluation through a fixed study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial which is evaluated in this article (the Social Fitness study) is registered with the Dutch Trial Register (NTR), clinical trial number NTR4347. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0927-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6172728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61727282018-10-15 Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial Donkers, H W Van der Veen, D J Teerenstra, S Vernooij-Dassen, M J Nijhuis-vander Sanden, M W G Graff, M J L BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: This process evaluation article describes the lessons learned from a failed trial which aimed to assess effectiveness of the tailor-made, multidisciplinary Social Fitness Programme to improve social participation of community-dwelling older people with cognitive problems (clients) and their caregivers (couples). METHODS: A process evaluation was performed to get insight in 1) the implementation of the intervention, 2) the context of intervention delivery from professionals’ point of view, and 3) the potential impact of intervention delivery from participants’ perspectives. Data was gathered using mixed-methods: questionnaires, focus group discussions, interviews, medical records. RESULTS: 1) Implementation. High study decline (65,3%) was mainly caused by a lack of internal motivation to increase social participation expressed by clients. 17 couples participated, however, intervention delivery was insufficient. 2) Context. Barriers during intervention delivery were most often related to client (changing needs), caregiver (increased burden) and health professional factors (delivery of integrated care lacked routine). 3) Impact Qualitative analyses revealed participants to be satisfied with intervention delivery, we were unable to capture these results through our primary outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation revealed the Social Fitness study did not fit in three ways. First, framing the intervention on social participation promotion was as threatening to clients. The feeling of being unable to adequately contribute to social interactions seemed to be causing embarrassment. Second, the intervention seemed to be too complex to implement in the way it was designed. Third, there is a tension between the offering of a personalised tailor-made intervention and evaluation through a fixed study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial which is evaluated in this article (the Social Fitness study) is registered with the Dutch Trial Register (NTR), clinical trial number NTR4347. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0927-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6172728/ /pubmed/30286714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0927-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Donkers, H W
Van der Veen, D J
Teerenstra, S
Vernooij-Dassen, M J
Nijhuis-vander Sanden, M W G
Graff, M J L
Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial
title Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial
title_full Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial
title_short Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial
title_sort evaluating the social fitness programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30286714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0927-8
work_keys_str_mv AT donkershw evaluatingthesocialfitnessprogrammeforolderpeoplewithcognitiveproblemsandtheircaregiverslessonslearnedfromafailedtrial
AT vanderveendj evaluatingthesocialfitnessprogrammeforolderpeoplewithcognitiveproblemsandtheircaregiverslessonslearnedfromafailedtrial
AT teerenstras evaluatingthesocialfitnessprogrammeforolderpeoplewithcognitiveproblemsandtheircaregiverslessonslearnedfromafailedtrial
AT vernooijdassenmj evaluatingthesocialfitnessprogrammeforolderpeoplewithcognitiveproblemsandtheircaregiverslessonslearnedfromafailedtrial
AT nijhuisvandersandenmwg evaluatingthesocialfitnessprogrammeforolderpeoplewithcognitiveproblemsandtheircaregiverslessonslearnedfromafailedtrial
AT graffmjl evaluatingthesocialfitnessprogrammeforolderpeoplewithcognitiveproblemsandtheircaregiverslessonslearnedfromafailedtrial