Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom

AIMS: Midostaurin (MIDO) has been proposed for the treatment of newly-diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with standard chemotherapy. The cost-effectiveness of MIDO and standard of care (SOC) followed by MIDO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tremblay, Gabriel, Dolph, Mike, Patel, Sachin, Brandt, Patricia, Forsythe, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4
_version_ 1783361002519134208
author Tremblay, Gabriel
Dolph, Mike
Patel, Sachin
Brandt, Patricia
Forsythe, Anna
author_facet Tremblay, Gabriel
Dolph, Mike
Patel, Sachin
Brandt, Patricia
Forsythe, Anna
author_sort Tremblay, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Midostaurin (MIDO) has been proposed for the treatment of newly-diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with standard chemotherapy. The cost-effectiveness of MIDO and standard of care (SOC) followed by MIDO monotherapy was compared to SOC alone for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML in the UK. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed from a UK public healthcare system perspective to compare the cost-effectiveness of MIDO plus SOC and SOC over a lifetime horizon. The model included the following health states/partitions: induction, consolidation, monotherapy, complete remission (CR), relapse, stem cell transplantation (SCT), SCT recovery, and post-SCT recovery. Data on CR, overall survival, and adverse events were obtained from a Phase III clinical trial. Overall survival was extrapolated beyond the trial horizon using a ‘cure model’ approach and data from the Office for National Statistics. Utilities were identified via a systematic review. Routine care utilization was obtained from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence single technology appraisal for azacitidine in AML (TA399). The costs of drugs and administration, adverse events, hospitalizations, physician visits, and end-of-life care were incorporated. RESULTS: Incremental life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by patients on MIDO and SOC versus SOC were 1.67 and 1.47, respectively. At an incremental cost of £54,072 over a lifetime horizon, the ICER was £32,465 per LY and £36,826 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the base case findings. CONCLUSIONS: With limited treatments in FLT3+ AML, MIDO represents a clinically significant advance in the management of newly-diagnosed AML. Using a threshold of £50,000 per QALY for end-of-life treatment, MIDO was shown to be a cost-effective option for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6172753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61727532018-10-15 Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom Tremblay, Gabriel Dolph, Mike Patel, Sachin Brandt, Patricia Forsythe, Anna Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research AIMS: Midostaurin (MIDO) has been proposed for the treatment of newly-diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with standard chemotherapy. The cost-effectiveness of MIDO and standard of care (SOC) followed by MIDO monotherapy was compared to SOC alone for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML in the UK. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed from a UK public healthcare system perspective to compare the cost-effectiveness of MIDO plus SOC and SOC over a lifetime horizon. The model included the following health states/partitions: induction, consolidation, monotherapy, complete remission (CR), relapse, stem cell transplantation (SCT), SCT recovery, and post-SCT recovery. Data on CR, overall survival, and adverse events were obtained from a Phase III clinical trial. Overall survival was extrapolated beyond the trial horizon using a ‘cure model’ approach and data from the Office for National Statistics. Utilities were identified via a systematic review. Routine care utilization was obtained from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence single technology appraisal for azacitidine in AML (TA399). The costs of drugs and administration, adverse events, hospitalizations, physician visits, and end-of-life care were incorporated. RESULTS: Incremental life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by patients on MIDO and SOC versus SOC were 1.67 and 1.47, respectively. At an incremental cost of £54,072 over a lifetime horizon, the ICER was £32,465 per LY and £36,826 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the base case findings. CONCLUSIONS: With limited treatments in FLT3+ AML, MIDO represents a clinically significant advance in the management of newly-diagnosed AML. Using a threshold of £50,000 per QALY for end-of-life treatment, MIDO was shown to be a cost-effective option for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6172753/ /pubmed/30323718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tremblay, Gabriel
Dolph, Mike
Patel, Sachin
Brandt, Patricia
Forsythe, Anna
Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
title Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the united kingdom
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tremblaygabriel costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom
AT dolphmike costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom
AT patelsachin costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom
AT brandtpatricia costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom
AT forsytheanna costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom