Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom
AIMS: Midostaurin (MIDO) has been proposed for the treatment of newly-diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with standard chemotherapy. The cost-effectiveness of MIDO and standard of care (SOC) followed by MIDO...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4 |
_version_ | 1783361002519134208 |
---|---|
author | Tremblay, Gabriel Dolph, Mike Patel, Sachin Brandt, Patricia Forsythe, Anna |
author_facet | Tremblay, Gabriel Dolph, Mike Patel, Sachin Brandt, Patricia Forsythe, Anna |
author_sort | Tremblay, Gabriel |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Midostaurin (MIDO) has been proposed for the treatment of newly-diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with standard chemotherapy. The cost-effectiveness of MIDO and standard of care (SOC) followed by MIDO monotherapy was compared to SOC alone for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML in the UK. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed from a UK public healthcare system perspective to compare the cost-effectiveness of MIDO plus SOC and SOC over a lifetime horizon. The model included the following health states/partitions: induction, consolidation, monotherapy, complete remission (CR), relapse, stem cell transplantation (SCT), SCT recovery, and post-SCT recovery. Data on CR, overall survival, and adverse events were obtained from a Phase III clinical trial. Overall survival was extrapolated beyond the trial horizon using a ‘cure model’ approach and data from the Office for National Statistics. Utilities were identified via a systematic review. Routine care utilization was obtained from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence single technology appraisal for azacitidine in AML (TA399). The costs of drugs and administration, adverse events, hospitalizations, physician visits, and end-of-life care were incorporated. RESULTS: Incremental life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by patients on MIDO and SOC versus SOC were 1.67 and 1.47, respectively. At an incremental cost of £54,072 over a lifetime horizon, the ICER was £32,465 per LY and £36,826 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the base case findings. CONCLUSIONS: With limited treatments in FLT3+ AML, MIDO represents a clinically significant advance in the management of newly-diagnosed AML. Using a threshold of £50,000 per QALY for end-of-life treatment, MIDO was shown to be a cost-effective option for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6172753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61727532018-10-15 Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom Tremblay, Gabriel Dolph, Mike Patel, Sachin Brandt, Patricia Forsythe, Anna Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research AIMS: Midostaurin (MIDO) has been proposed for the treatment of newly-diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutation-positive (FLT3+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in combination with standard chemotherapy. The cost-effectiveness of MIDO and standard of care (SOC) followed by MIDO monotherapy was compared to SOC alone for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML in the UK. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed from a UK public healthcare system perspective to compare the cost-effectiveness of MIDO plus SOC and SOC over a lifetime horizon. The model included the following health states/partitions: induction, consolidation, monotherapy, complete remission (CR), relapse, stem cell transplantation (SCT), SCT recovery, and post-SCT recovery. Data on CR, overall survival, and adverse events were obtained from a Phase III clinical trial. Overall survival was extrapolated beyond the trial horizon using a ‘cure model’ approach and data from the Office for National Statistics. Utilities were identified via a systematic review. Routine care utilization was obtained from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence single technology appraisal for azacitidine in AML (TA399). The costs of drugs and administration, adverse events, hospitalizations, physician visits, and end-of-life care were incorporated. RESULTS: Incremental life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by patients on MIDO and SOC versus SOC were 1.67 and 1.47, respectively. At an incremental cost of £54,072 over a lifetime horizon, the ICER was £32,465 per LY and £36,826 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the base case findings. CONCLUSIONS: With limited treatments in FLT3+ AML, MIDO represents a clinically significant advance in the management of newly-diagnosed AML. Using a threshold of £50,000 per QALY for end-of-life treatment, MIDO was shown to be a cost-effective option for newly-diagnosed FLT3+ AML. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6172753/ /pubmed/30323718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tremblay, Gabriel Dolph, Mike Patel, Sachin Brandt, Patricia Forsythe, Anna Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis for midostaurin versus standard of care in acute myeloid leukemia in the united kingdom |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0153-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tremblaygabriel costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom AT dolphmike costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom AT patelsachin costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom AT brandtpatricia costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom AT forsytheanna costeffectivenessanalysisformidostaurinversusstandardofcareinacutemyeloidleukemiaintheunitedkingdom |