Cargando…

Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Patients’ quality of life has become a major objective of care in oncology. At the same time, it has become the object of increasing interest by researchers, working with both quantitative and qualitative methods. Progress in oncology has enabled more patients to survive longer, so that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sibeoni, Jordan, Picard, Camille, Orri, Massimiliano, Labey, Mathilde, Bousquet, Guilhem, Verneuil, Laurence, Revah-Levy, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30286733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4868-6
_version_ 1783361005623967744
author Sibeoni, Jordan
Picard, Camille
Orri, Massimiliano
Labey, Mathilde
Bousquet, Guilhem
Verneuil, Laurence
Revah-Levy, Anne
author_facet Sibeoni, Jordan
Picard, Camille
Orri, Massimiliano
Labey, Mathilde
Bousquet, Guilhem
Verneuil, Laurence
Revah-Levy, Anne
author_sort Sibeoni, Jordan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients’ quality of life has become a major objective of care in oncology. At the same time, it has become the object of increasing interest by researchers, working with both quantitative and qualitative methods. Progress in oncology has enabled more patients to survive longer, so that cancer is increasingly often a chronic disease that requires long-term treatment that can have negative effects on patients’ quality of daily life. Nonetheless, no qualitative study has explored what patients report affects their quality of daily life during the treatment period. This study is intended to fill this gap. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter qualitative study based on 30 semi-structured interviews. Participants, purposively selected until data saturation, had diverse types of cancer and had started treatment at least 6 months before interview. Data were examined by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Our analysis found two themes: (1) what negatively affected for patient’s quality of daily life during the treatment period, a question to which patients responded by talking only about the side effects of treatment; and (2) what positively affected their quality of daily life during the treatment period with three sub-themes: (i) The interest in having —investing in — a support object that can be defined as an object, a relationship or an activity particularly invested by the patients which makes them feel good and makes the cancer and its treatment bearable, (ii)The subjective perception of the efficacy of the antitumor treatment and (iii) the positive effects of relationships, with friends and family, and also with their physician. CONCLUSIONS: Patients must be involved in their care if they are to be able to bear their course of treatment and find ways to endure the difficult experience of cancer care. The support object represents an important therapeutic lever that can be used by their oncologists. They should be interested in their support objects, in order to support the patients in this investment and to help them to maintain it throughout the health care pathway. Furthermore, showing interest in this topic, important to the patient, could improve the physician-patient relation without using up very much of the physician’s time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6172766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61727662018-10-15 Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study Sibeoni, Jordan Picard, Camille Orri, Massimiliano Labey, Mathilde Bousquet, Guilhem Verneuil, Laurence Revah-Levy, Anne BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients’ quality of life has become a major objective of care in oncology. At the same time, it has become the object of increasing interest by researchers, working with both quantitative and qualitative methods. Progress in oncology has enabled more patients to survive longer, so that cancer is increasingly often a chronic disease that requires long-term treatment that can have negative effects on patients’ quality of daily life. Nonetheless, no qualitative study has explored what patients report affects their quality of daily life during the treatment period. This study is intended to fill this gap. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter qualitative study based on 30 semi-structured interviews. Participants, purposively selected until data saturation, had diverse types of cancer and had started treatment at least 6 months before interview. Data were examined by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Our analysis found two themes: (1) what negatively affected for patient’s quality of daily life during the treatment period, a question to which patients responded by talking only about the side effects of treatment; and (2) what positively affected their quality of daily life during the treatment period with three sub-themes: (i) The interest in having —investing in — a support object that can be defined as an object, a relationship or an activity particularly invested by the patients which makes them feel good and makes the cancer and its treatment bearable, (ii)The subjective perception of the efficacy of the antitumor treatment and (iii) the positive effects of relationships, with friends and family, and also with their physician. CONCLUSIONS: Patients must be involved in their care if they are to be able to bear their course of treatment and find ways to endure the difficult experience of cancer care. The support object represents an important therapeutic lever that can be used by their oncologists. They should be interested in their support objects, in order to support the patients in this investment and to help them to maintain it throughout the health care pathway. Furthermore, showing interest in this topic, important to the patient, could improve the physician-patient relation without using up very much of the physician’s time. BioMed Central 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6172766/ /pubmed/30286733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4868-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sibeoni, Jordan
Picard, Camille
Orri, Massimiliano
Labey, Mathilde
Bousquet, Guilhem
Verneuil, Laurence
Revah-Levy, Anne
Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study
title Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study
title_full Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study
title_short Patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study
title_sort patients’ quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30286733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4868-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sibeonijordan patientsqualityoflifeduringactivecancertreatmentaqualitativestudy
AT picardcamille patientsqualityoflifeduringactivecancertreatmentaqualitativestudy
AT orrimassimiliano patientsqualityoflifeduringactivecancertreatmentaqualitativestudy
AT labeymathilde patientsqualityoflifeduringactivecancertreatmentaqualitativestudy
AT bousquetguilhem patientsqualityoflifeduringactivecancertreatmentaqualitativestudy
AT verneuillaurence patientsqualityoflifeduringactivecancertreatmentaqualitativestudy
AT revahlevyanne patientsqualityoflifeduringactivecancertreatmentaqualitativestudy