Cargando…

A Dose Falloff Gradient Study in RapidArc Planning of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

INTRODUCTION: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) report #0813 and 0915 recommends using D(2cm) and R(50%) as plan quality metrics for evaluation of normal tissue sparing in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung lesion. This study introduces dose falloff gradient (DFG) as a tool for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narayanasamy, Ganesh, Desai, Dharmin, Maraboyina, Sanjay, Penagaricano, Jose, Zwicker, Robert, Johnson, Ellis Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305771
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_38_18
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) report #0813 and 0915 recommends using D(2cm) and R(50%) as plan quality metrics for evaluation of normal tissue sparing in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung lesion. This study introduces dose falloff gradient (DFG) as a tool for analyzing the dose beyond the planning target volume (PTV) extending into normal tissue structures. In ascertaining the impact of PTV size and SBRT planning techniques in DFG, this study questions the independence of the RTOG recommended metrics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 41 RapidArc lung SBRT plans with 2 or 3 complete or partial arcs were analyzed. PTV volumes ranged between 5.3 and 113 cm(3) and their geographic locations were distributed in both lungs. 6MV, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV, or 10 MV-FFF energies were used. RTOG-0915 metrics conformity index, homogeneity index, D(2cm), R(50%), and HD(loc) were evaluated. DFG was computed from the mean and maximum dose in seven concentric 5 mm wide rings outside the PTV. DFG was investigated against the volume of normal lung irradiated by 50% isodose volume. Treatment plans with alternate energy and couch rotations were generated. RESULTS: The dose falloff beyond PTV was modeled using a double exponential fit and evaluated for relationship with intermediate lung dose. Photon energy and beam configuration had a minimal impact on the dose falloff outside. The product of normalized D(2cm) and R(50%) was estimated to have a slowly varying value. CONCLUSIONS: Dose falloff outside PTV has been studied as a function of radial distance and ascertained by intermediate dose to normal lung. DFG can serve as a complementary plan quality metric.