Cargando…
Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Beginning in 2012, all States in India eventually banned the sale of gutka. This study was conducted to investigate gutka vendors’ knowledge on gutka ban, products covered under ban, penalties for non-compliance and action for enforcement by government agencies. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30264758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_121_18 |
_version_ | 1783361041268211712 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Gaurav Pednekar, M.S. Narake, Sameer Dhumal, Gauri Gupta, P.C. |
author_facet | Kumar, Gaurav Pednekar, M.S. Narake, Sameer Dhumal, Gauri Gupta, P.C. |
author_sort | Kumar, Gaurav |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Beginning in 2012, all States in India eventually banned the sale of gutka. This study was conducted to investigate gutka vendors’ knowledge on gutka ban, products covered under ban, penalties for non-compliance and action for enforcement by government agencies. METHODS: Twenty vendors were interviewed, 10 each in Mumbai (Maharashtra) and Indore (Madhya Pradesh) during May - June, 2013, one year after ban was imposed. Interviewers used a standardized questionnaire to assess vendors’ knowledge of gutka ban, their attitude towards it and compliance to it in practice. RESULTS: All 20 vendors were aware that gutka sale was banned. However, despite ban, eight of the 10 vendors in Mumbai perceived sale of pan masala as legal. In Indore, all 10 vendors perceived sale of Indori Tambakoo, a local gutka variant, as legal. No vendor was sure about the quantum of fine applicable on being caught selling the banned product. Two vendors in Mumbai and nine in Indore admitted selling gutka. Five vendors in Mumbai and four in Indore supported an existing ban on gutka. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: All vendors were aware of the ban on gutka and reason for it. Many vendors supported the ban. However, awareness of other products covered under ban and on fines in case of non-compliance was low. Law enforcement system needs to be intensified to implement ban. Notification of ban needs to be further strengthened and made unambiguous to explicitly include all smokeless tobacco products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6172922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61729222018-10-10 Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India Kumar, Gaurav Pednekar, M.S. Narake, Sameer Dhumal, Gauri Gupta, P.C. Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Beginning in 2012, all States in India eventually banned the sale of gutka. This study was conducted to investigate gutka vendors’ knowledge on gutka ban, products covered under ban, penalties for non-compliance and action for enforcement by government agencies. METHODS: Twenty vendors were interviewed, 10 each in Mumbai (Maharashtra) and Indore (Madhya Pradesh) during May - June, 2013, one year after ban was imposed. Interviewers used a standardized questionnaire to assess vendors’ knowledge of gutka ban, their attitude towards it and compliance to it in practice. RESULTS: All 20 vendors were aware that gutka sale was banned. However, despite ban, eight of the 10 vendors in Mumbai perceived sale of pan masala as legal. In Indore, all 10 vendors perceived sale of Indori Tambakoo, a local gutka variant, as legal. No vendor was sure about the quantum of fine applicable on being caught selling the banned product. Two vendors in Mumbai and nine in Indore admitted selling gutka. Five vendors in Mumbai and four in Indore supported an existing ban on gutka. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: All vendors were aware of the ban on gutka and reason for it. Many vendors supported the ban. However, awareness of other products covered under ban and on fines in case of non-compliance was low. Law enforcement system needs to be intensified to implement ban. Notification of ban needs to be further strengthened and made unambiguous to explicitly include all smokeless tobacco products. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6172922/ /pubmed/30264758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_121_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Gaurav Pednekar, M.S. Narake, Sameer Dhumal, Gauri Gupta, P.C. Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India |
title | Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India |
title_full | Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India |
title_fullStr | Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India |
title_full_unstemmed | Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India |
title_short | Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India |
title_sort | feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two states of india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30264758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_121_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumargaurav feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia AT pednekarms feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia AT narakesameer feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia AT dhumalgauri feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia AT guptapc feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia |