Cargando…

Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Beginning in 2012, all States in India eventually banned the sale of gutka. This study was conducted to investigate gutka vendors’ knowledge on gutka ban, products covered under ban, penalties for non-compliance and action for enforcement by government agencies. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Gaurav, Pednekar, M.S., Narake, Sameer, Dhumal, Gauri, Gupta, P.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30264758
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_121_18
_version_ 1783361041268211712
author Kumar, Gaurav
Pednekar, M.S.
Narake, Sameer
Dhumal, Gauri
Gupta, P.C.
author_facet Kumar, Gaurav
Pednekar, M.S.
Narake, Sameer
Dhumal, Gauri
Gupta, P.C.
author_sort Kumar, Gaurav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Beginning in 2012, all States in India eventually banned the sale of gutka. This study was conducted to investigate gutka vendors’ knowledge on gutka ban, products covered under ban, penalties for non-compliance and action for enforcement by government agencies. METHODS: Twenty vendors were interviewed, 10 each in Mumbai (Maharashtra) and Indore (Madhya Pradesh) during May - June, 2013, one year after ban was imposed. Interviewers used a standardized questionnaire to assess vendors’ knowledge of gutka ban, their attitude towards it and compliance to it in practice. RESULTS: All 20 vendors were aware that gutka sale was banned. However, despite ban, eight of the 10 vendors in Mumbai perceived sale of pan masala as legal. In Indore, all 10 vendors perceived sale of Indori Tambakoo, a local gutka variant, as legal. No vendor was sure about the quantum of fine applicable on being caught selling the banned product. Two vendors in Mumbai and nine in Indore admitted selling gutka. Five vendors in Mumbai and four in Indore supported an existing ban on gutka. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: All vendors were aware of the ban on gutka and reason for it. Many vendors supported the ban. However, awareness of other products covered under ban and on fines in case of non-compliance was low. Law enforcement system needs to be intensified to implement ban. Notification of ban needs to be further strengthened and made unambiguous to explicitly include all smokeless tobacco products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6172922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61729222018-10-10 Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India Kumar, Gaurav Pednekar, M.S. Narake, Sameer Dhumal, Gauri Gupta, P.C. Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Beginning in 2012, all States in India eventually banned the sale of gutka. This study was conducted to investigate gutka vendors’ knowledge on gutka ban, products covered under ban, penalties for non-compliance and action for enforcement by government agencies. METHODS: Twenty vendors were interviewed, 10 each in Mumbai (Maharashtra) and Indore (Madhya Pradesh) during May - June, 2013, one year after ban was imposed. Interviewers used a standardized questionnaire to assess vendors’ knowledge of gutka ban, their attitude towards it and compliance to it in practice. RESULTS: All 20 vendors were aware that gutka sale was banned. However, despite ban, eight of the 10 vendors in Mumbai perceived sale of pan masala as legal. In Indore, all 10 vendors perceived sale of Indori Tambakoo, a local gutka variant, as legal. No vendor was sure about the quantum of fine applicable on being caught selling the banned product. Two vendors in Mumbai and nine in Indore admitted selling gutka. Five vendors in Mumbai and four in Indore supported an existing ban on gutka. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: All vendors were aware of the ban on gutka and reason for it. Many vendors supported the ban. However, awareness of other products covered under ban and on fines in case of non-compliance was low. Law enforcement system needs to be intensified to implement ban. Notification of ban needs to be further strengthened and made unambiguous to explicitly include all smokeless tobacco products. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6172922/ /pubmed/30264758 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_121_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Gaurav
Pednekar, M.S.
Narake, Sameer
Dhumal, Gauri
Gupta, P.C.
Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India
title Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India
title_full Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India
title_fullStr Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India
title_full_unstemmed Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India
title_short Feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two States of India
title_sort feedback from vendors on gutka ban in two states of india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30264758
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_121_18
work_keys_str_mv AT kumargaurav feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia
AT pednekarms feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia
AT narakesameer feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia
AT dhumalgauri feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia
AT guptapc feedbackfromvendorsongutkabanintwostatesofindia