Cargando…

Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity

INTRODUCTION: A well-established body of literature demonstrates that health and equity are strongly influenced by the consequences of governments’ policy and resultant actions (or inactions) outside the health sector. Consequently, the United Nations, and its agency the WHO, have called for nationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baum, Fran, Delany-Crowe, Toni, Fisher, Matthew, MacDougall, Colin, Harris, Patrick, McDermott, Dennis, Marinova, Dora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30287616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025358
_version_ 1783361097663774720
author Baum, Fran
Delany-Crowe, Toni
Fisher, Matthew
MacDougall, Colin
Harris, Patrick
McDermott, Dennis
Marinova, Dora
author_facet Baum, Fran
Delany-Crowe, Toni
Fisher, Matthew
MacDougall, Colin
Harris, Patrick
McDermott, Dennis
Marinova, Dora
author_sort Baum, Fran
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A well-established body of literature demonstrates that health and equity are strongly influenced by the consequences of governments’ policy and resultant actions (or inactions) outside the health sector. Consequently, the United Nations, and its agency the WHO, have called for national leadership and whole-of-government action to understand and address the health impacts of policies in all sectors. This research responds to that call by investigating how policymaking in four sectors—urban planning, justice, energy and environment—may influence the social determinants of health and health equity (SDH/HE). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The research design is informed by a critical qualitative approach. Three successive stages are included in the design. The first involves analysing all strategic policy documents and selected legislative documents from the four sectors (n=583). The document analysis is based on a coding framework developed to identify alignment between the documents and the SDH/HE. Two policies that demonstrate good practice in regard to SDH/HE will be selected from each sector during the second stage for embedded case study analysis (total n=8). This is intended to illuminate which factors have supported recognition and action on SDH/HE in the selected policies. The third stage involves progressive theoretical integration and development to understand political and institutional facilitators and barriers to action on SDH/HE, both within and between sectors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research will provide much needed evidence about how coherent whole-of-government action on SDH/HE can be advanced and contribute knowledge about how health-enhancing policy activity in the four sectors may be optimised. Learnings from the research will be shared via a project advisory group, policy briefings, academic papers, conference presentations and research symposia. Ethics approval has been secured for the embedded case studies, which involve research participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6173260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61732602018-10-10 Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity Baum, Fran Delany-Crowe, Toni Fisher, Matthew MacDougall, Colin Harris, Patrick McDermott, Dennis Marinova, Dora BMJ Open Health Policy INTRODUCTION: A well-established body of literature demonstrates that health and equity are strongly influenced by the consequences of governments’ policy and resultant actions (or inactions) outside the health sector. Consequently, the United Nations, and its agency the WHO, have called for national leadership and whole-of-government action to understand and address the health impacts of policies in all sectors. This research responds to that call by investigating how policymaking in four sectors—urban planning, justice, energy and environment—may influence the social determinants of health and health equity (SDH/HE). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The research design is informed by a critical qualitative approach. Three successive stages are included in the design. The first involves analysing all strategic policy documents and selected legislative documents from the four sectors (n=583). The document analysis is based on a coding framework developed to identify alignment between the documents and the SDH/HE. Two policies that demonstrate good practice in regard to SDH/HE will be selected from each sector during the second stage for embedded case study analysis (total n=8). This is intended to illuminate which factors have supported recognition and action on SDH/HE in the selected policies. The third stage involves progressive theoretical integration and development to understand political and institutional facilitators and barriers to action on SDH/HE, both within and between sectors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research will provide much needed evidence about how coherent whole-of-government action on SDH/HE can be advanced and contribute knowledge about how health-enhancing policy activity in the four sectors may be optimised. Learnings from the research will be shared via a project advisory group, policy briefings, academic papers, conference presentations and research symposia. Ethics approval has been secured for the embedded case studies, which involve research participants. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6173260/ /pubmed/30287616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025358 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Baum, Fran
Delany-Crowe, Toni
Fisher, Matthew
MacDougall, Colin
Harris, Patrick
McDermott, Dennis
Marinova, Dora
Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity
title Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity
title_full Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity
title_fullStr Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity
title_short Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity
title_sort qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30287616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025358
work_keys_str_mv AT baumfran qualitativeprotocolforunderstandingthecontributionofaustralianpolicyintheurbanplanningjusticeenergyandenvironmentsectorstopromotinghealthandhealthequity
AT delanycrowetoni qualitativeprotocolforunderstandingthecontributionofaustralianpolicyintheurbanplanningjusticeenergyandenvironmentsectorstopromotinghealthandhealthequity
AT fishermatthew qualitativeprotocolforunderstandingthecontributionofaustralianpolicyintheurbanplanningjusticeenergyandenvironmentsectorstopromotinghealthandhealthequity
AT macdougallcolin qualitativeprotocolforunderstandingthecontributionofaustralianpolicyintheurbanplanningjusticeenergyandenvironmentsectorstopromotinghealthandhealthequity
AT harrispatrick qualitativeprotocolforunderstandingthecontributionofaustralianpolicyintheurbanplanningjusticeenergyandenvironmentsectorstopromotinghealthandhealthequity
AT mcdermottdennis qualitativeprotocolforunderstandingthecontributionofaustralianpolicyintheurbanplanningjusticeenergyandenvironmentsectorstopromotinghealthandhealthequity
AT marinovadora qualitativeprotocolforunderstandingthecontributionofaustralianpolicyintheurbanplanningjusticeenergyandenvironmentsectorstopromotinghealthandhealthequity