Cargando…
Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z |
_version_ | 1783361192670003200 |
---|---|
author | Dote, Satoshi Itakura, Shoji Kamei, Kohei Hira, Daiki Noda, Satoshi Kobayashi, Yuka Terada, Tomohiro |
author_facet | Dote, Satoshi Itakura, Shoji Kamei, Kohei Hira, Daiki Noda, Satoshi Kobayashi, Yuka Terada, Tomohiro |
author_sort | Dote, Satoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in oral mucositis between panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. A total of 75 colorectal cancer outpatients treated with an anti-EGFR antibody combined with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or 5-FU/leucovorin as the first- to third-line treatment were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2–3 oral mucositis. The secondary endpoint was the time to onset of oral mucositis. We also compared the incidence of toxicities of interest, skin toxicity, hypomagnesaemia and neutropenia, and time to treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients treated with Pmab and 43 patients treated with Cmab were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2–3 oral mucositis was significantly higher with Pmab than with Cmab (31.3% vs 9.3%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis was significantly higher in patients treated with Pmab (18.8% vs 0%, P < 0.01). The mean (SD) cycles to onset of the worst oral mucositis was 3.0 (2.9) in the Pmab group and 2.3 (1.7) in the Cmab group (P = 0.29). Oral mucositis was characterized by glossitis and cheilitis. The incidences of other toxicities were the following (Pmab vs Cmab): grade 2–3 skin toxicity: 68.8% vs 74.4% (P = 0.61), grade 2–3 hypomagnesaemia: 9.3% vs 7.0% (P = 1.00), grade 3–4 neutropenia: 28.1% vs 37.2% (P = 0.46). The median TTF was not significantly different, i.e., 223 days vs 200 days (P = 0.39) for Pmab vs Cmab. CONCLUSIONS: Pmab-based chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher grades of oral mucositis compared with Cmab-based chemotherapy. The oral condition should be monitored carefully and early supportive care should be provided for patients treated with Pmab-based chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6173836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61738362018-10-15 Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study Dote, Satoshi Itakura, Shoji Kamei, Kohei Hira, Daiki Noda, Satoshi Kobayashi, Yuka Terada, Tomohiro BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis impairs the quality of life. The difference in severity of oral mucositis between different anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies combined with cytotoxic drugs in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in oral mucositis between panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. A total of 75 colorectal cancer outpatients treated with an anti-EGFR antibody combined with FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or 5-FU/leucovorin as the first- to third-line treatment were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2–3 oral mucositis. The secondary endpoint was the time to onset of oral mucositis. We also compared the incidence of toxicities of interest, skin toxicity, hypomagnesaemia and neutropenia, and time to treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients treated with Pmab and 43 patients treated with Cmab were evaluated. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of grade 2–3 oral mucositis was significantly higher with Pmab than with Cmab (31.3% vs 9.3%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis was significantly higher in patients treated with Pmab (18.8% vs 0%, P < 0.01). The mean (SD) cycles to onset of the worst oral mucositis was 3.0 (2.9) in the Pmab group and 2.3 (1.7) in the Cmab group (P = 0.29). Oral mucositis was characterized by glossitis and cheilitis. The incidences of other toxicities were the following (Pmab vs Cmab): grade 2–3 skin toxicity: 68.8% vs 74.4% (P = 0.61), grade 2–3 hypomagnesaemia: 9.3% vs 7.0% (P = 1.00), grade 3–4 neutropenia: 28.1% vs 37.2% (P = 0.46). The median TTF was not significantly different, i.e., 223 days vs 200 days (P = 0.39) for Pmab vs Cmab. CONCLUSIONS: Pmab-based chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher grades of oral mucositis compared with Cmab-based chemotherapy. The oral condition should be monitored carefully and early supportive care should be provided for patients treated with Pmab-based chemotherapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6173836/ /pubmed/30290786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dote, Satoshi Itakura, Shoji Kamei, Kohei Hira, Daiki Noda, Satoshi Kobayashi, Yuka Terada, Tomohiro Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study |
title | Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Oral mucositis associated with anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | oral mucositis associated with anti-egfr therapy in colorectal cancer: single institutional retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4862-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dotesatoshi oralmucositisassociatedwithantiegfrtherapyincolorectalcancersingleinstitutionalretrospectivecohortstudy AT itakurashoji oralmucositisassociatedwithantiegfrtherapyincolorectalcancersingleinstitutionalretrospectivecohortstudy AT kameikohei oralmucositisassociatedwithantiegfrtherapyincolorectalcancersingleinstitutionalretrospectivecohortstudy AT hiradaiki oralmucositisassociatedwithantiegfrtherapyincolorectalcancersingleinstitutionalretrospectivecohortstudy AT nodasatoshi oralmucositisassociatedwithantiegfrtherapyincolorectalcancersingleinstitutionalretrospectivecohortstudy AT kobayashiyuka oralmucositisassociatedwithantiegfrtherapyincolorectalcancersingleinstitutionalretrospectivecohortstudy AT teradatomohiro oralmucositisassociatedwithantiegfrtherapyincolorectalcancersingleinstitutionalretrospectivecohortstudy |