Cargando…

Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation

BACKGROUND: to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytopathology according to previous knowledge of whether patients received radiotherapy (RT) treatment or not. METHODS: The study analyzed a sample of 95 cervix cytological slides; 24 with cytological abnormaliti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucena, Fernanda A., Costa, Ricardo F. A., Stein, Maira D., Andrade, Carlos E. M. C., Cintra, Geórgia F., Vieira, Marcelo A., Dufloth, Rozany M., Fregnani, José Humberto T. G., dos Reis, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0078-z
_version_ 1783361193919905792
author Lucena, Fernanda A.
Costa, Ricardo F. A.
Stein, Maira D.
Andrade, Carlos E. M. C.
Cintra, Geórgia F.
Vieira, Marcelo A.
Dufloth, Rozany M.
Fregnani, José Humberto T. G.
dos Reis, Ricardo
author_facet Lucena, Fernanda A.
Costa, Ricardo F. A.
Stein, Maira D.
Andrade, Carlos E. M. C.
Cintra, Geórgia F.
Vieira, Marcelo A.
Dufloth, Rozany M.
Fregnani, José Humberto T. G.
dos Reis, Ricardo
author_sort Lucena, Fernanda A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytopathology according to previous knowledge of whether patients received radiotherapy (RT) treatment or not. METHODS: The study analyzed a sample of 95 cervix cytological slides; 24 with cytological abnormalities (CA) and presence of RT; 21 without CA and presence of RT; 25 without CA and without previous RT; 25 with CA and without previous RT. Two cytopathology (CP) evaluations of the slides were carried out. For the first CP re-evaluation, the cytotechnologist was blinded for the information of previous RT. For the second CP re-evaluation, the cytotechnologist was informed about previous RT. The results were analyzed through inter and intraobserver agreement using the unweighted and weighted kappa. RESULTS: Post radiotherapy effects were identified in 44.4% of cases that undergone previous pelvic RT. The agreement for RT status was 66.32% (unweighted K = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.13; 0.49, moderate agreement). The intraobserver agreement, regarding the cytological diagnoses, regardless of radiotherapy status, was 80.32% (weighted K = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.34; 0.68). In no RT group, the intraobserver agreement was 70% (weighted K = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.27;0.65) and in patients that received RT, the intraobserver agreement was 84.09% (unweighted K = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.01;0.74). The interobserver agreement between cytopathology result (abnormal or normal) in the group with RT, considering normal and abnormal CP diagnosis was 14.0% and 12.5%, respectively. There was no association between the cytological alterations and the median time between the end of RT and the cytological diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This study showed that RT has an important impact in CP diagnosis because the agreement, also in interobserver and intraobserver analysis, had high discrepancy in patients that received RT. Also, demonstrated that it is difficult to recognize the presence of RT in cytological slides when this information is not provided. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12907-018-0078-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6173841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61738412018-10-15 Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation Lucena, Fernanda A. Costa, Ricardo F. A. Stein, Maira D. Andrade, Carlos E. M. C. Cintra, Geórgia F. Vieira, Marcelo A. Dufloth, Rozany M. Fregnani, José Humberto T. G. dos Reis, Ricardo BMC Clin Pathol Research Article BACKGROUND: to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytopathology according to previous knowledge of whether patients received radiotherapy (RT) treatment or not. METHODS: The study analyzed a sample of 95 cervix cytological slides; 24 with cytological abnormalities (CA) and presence of RT; 21 without CA and presence of RT; 25 without CA and without previous RT; 25 with CA and without previous RT. Two cytopathology (CP) evaluations of the slides were carried out. For the first CP re-evaluation, the cytotechnologist was blinded for the information of previous RT. For the second CP re-evaluation, the cytotechnologist was informed about previous RT. The results were analyzed through inter and intraobserver agreement using the unweighted and weighted kappa. RESULTS: Post radiotherapy effects were identified in 44.4% of cases that undergone previous pelvic RT. The agreement for RT status was 66.32% (unweighted K = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.13; 0.49, moderate agreement). The intraobserver agreement, regarding the cytological diagnoses, regardless of radiotherapy status, was 80.32% (weighted K = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.34; 0.68). In no RT group, the intraobserver agreement was 70% (weighted K = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.27;0.65) and in patients that received RT, the intraobserver agreement was 84.09% (unweighted K = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.01;0.74). The interobserver agreement between cytopathology result (abnormal or normal) in the group with RT, considering normal and abnormal CP diagnosis was 14.0% and 12.5%, respectively. There was no association between the cytological alterations and the median time between the end of RT and the cytological diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This study showed that RT has an important impact in CP diagnosis because the agreement, also in interobserver and intraobserver analysis, had high discrepancy in patients that received RT. Also, demonstrated that it is difficult to recognize the presence of RT in cytological slides when this information is not provided. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12907-018-0078-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6173841/ /pubmed/30323716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0078-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lucena, Fernanda A.
Costa, Ricardo F. A.
Stein, Maira D.
Andrade, Carlos E. M. C.
Cintra, Geórgia F.
Vieira, Marcelo A.
Dufloth, Rozany M.
Fregnani, José Humberto T. G.
dos Reis, Ricardo
Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation
title Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation
title_full Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation
title_fullStr Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation
title_short Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation
title_sort pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0078-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lucenafernandaa pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT costaricardofa pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT steinmairad pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT andradecarlosemc pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT cintrageorgiaf pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT vieiramarceloa pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT duflothrozanym pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT fregnanijosehumbertotg pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation
AT dosreisricardo pelvicradiotherapyforcervicalcanceraffectsimportantlythereproducibilityofcytologicalalterationsevaluation