Cargando…

Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents

BACKGROUND: To report the switch rate of conventional immunosuppressive (CIS) therapies to the biological agents (BA) in patients with refractory Behcet’s uveitis (BU). METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical records were reviewed of 76 patients’ 116 eyes presenting with BU who had been treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celiker, Hande, Kazokoglu, Haluk, Direskeneli, Haner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0929-5
_version_ 1783361194628743168
author Celiker, Hande
Kazokoglu, Haluk
Direskeneli, Haner
author_facet Celiker, Hande
Kazokoglu, Haluk
Direskeneli, Haner
author_sort Celiker, Hande
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To report the switch rate of conventional immunosuppressive (CIS) therapies to the biological agents (BA) in patients with refractory Behcet’s uveitis (BU). METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical records were reviewed of 76 patients’ 116 eyes presenting with BU who had been treated with immunosuppressive drug therapy. Mann Whitney U test was used for the intergroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution as well as calculation of descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency and rate). Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was used for the intragroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution. Pearson’s Chi-Square test and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used for the comparisons of qualitative data. RESULTS: Except for one, all patients were first treated with CIS regimens for BU. Thirty-one patients (41.3%) who were unresponsive to CIS regimens were switched to IFNα2a therapy. After that, eight of these cases were switched to the anti-TNF-α treatments. The presence of initial ocular complications were found to be statistically higher in BA treated patients than the CIS treated cases (p < 0.001). Both in CIS treated and in BA treated cases, an increase in visual acuity (VA) was observed during the last examination compared to the initial examination and was significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CIS treatment was found to be effective and safe, as suggested in the management guidelines for severe BU. Biological therapy was also found effective for the improvement of the VA. We observed that 58.7% of cases could be treated with strong immunosuppressive therapies, however, nearly half of the patients could have lost their VA if BAs were not existent. During the treatment course of severe cases with BU, classical therapy stage must still be protected as the first-line therapy due to the their reasonable activity and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6173844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61738442018-10-15 Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents Celiker, Hande Kazokoglu, Haluk Direskeneli, Haner BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To report the switch rate of conventional immunosuppressive (CIS) therapies to the biological agents (BA) in patients with refractory Behcet’s uveitis (BU). METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical records were reviewed of 76 patients’ 116 eyes presenting with BU who had been treated with immunosuppressive drug therapy. Mann Whitney U test was used for the intergroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution as well as calculation of descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency and rate). Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was used for the intragroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution. Pearson’s Chi-Square test and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used for the comparisons of qualitative data. RESULTS: Except for one, all patients were first treated with CIS regimens for BU. Thirty-one patients (41.3%) who were unresponsive to CIS regimens were switched to IFNα2a therapy. After that, eight of these cases were switched to the anti-TNF-α treatments. The presence of initial ocular complications were found to be statistically higher in BA treated patients than the CIS treated cases (p < 0.001). Both in CIS treated and in BA treated cases, an increase in visual acuity (VA) was observed during the last examination compared to the initial examination and was significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CIS treatment was found to be effective and safe, as suggested in the management guidelines for severe BU. Biological therapy was also found effective for the improvement of the VA. We observed that 58.7% of cases could be treated with strong immunosuppressive therapies, however, nearly half of the patients could have lost their VA if BAs were not existent. During the treatment course of severe cases with BU, classical therapy stage must still be protected as the first-line therapy due to the their reasonable activity and safety. BioMed Central 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6173844/ /pubmed/30290779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0929-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Celiker, Hande
Kazokoglu, Haluk
Direskeneli, Haner
Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
title Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
title_full Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
title_fullStr Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
title_full_unstemmed Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
title_short Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
title_sort conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe behcet’s uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0929-5
work_keys_str_mv AT celikerhande conventionalimmunosuppressivetherapyinseverebehcetsuveitistheswitchratetothebiologicalagents
AT kazokogluhaluk conventionalimmunosuppressivetherapyinseverebehcetsuveitistheswitchratetothebiologicalagents
AT direskenelihaner conventionalimmunosuppressivetherapyinseverebehcetsuveitistheswitchratetothebiologicalagents