Cargando…
Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents
BACKGROUND: To report the switch rate of conventional immunosuppressive (CIS) therapies to the biological agents (BA) in patients with refractory Behcet’s uveitis (BU). METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical records were reviewed of 76 patients’ 116 eyes presenting with BU who had been treat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0929-5 |
_version_ | 1783361194628743168 |
---|---|
author | Celiker, Hande Kazokoglu, Haluk Direskeneli, Haner |
author_facet | Celiker, Hande Kazokoglu, Haluk Direskeneli, Haner |
author_sort | Celiker, Hande |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To report the switch rate of conventional immunosuppressive (CIS) therapies to the biological agents (BA) in patients with refractory Behcet’s uveitis (BU). METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical records were reviewed of 76 patients’ 116 eyes presenting with BU who had been treated with immunosuppressive drug therapy. Mann Whitney U test was used for the intergroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution as well as calculation of descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency and rate). Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was used for the intragroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution. Pearson’s Chi-Square test and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used for the comparisons of qualitative data. RESULTS: Except for one, all patients were first treated with CIS regimens for BU. Thirty-one patients (41.3%) who were unresponsive to CIS regimens were switched to IFNα2a therapy. After that, eight of these cases were switched to the anti-TNF-α treatments. The presence of initial ocular complications were found to be statistically higher in BA treated patients than the CIS treated cases (p < 0.001). Both in CIS treated and in BA treated cases, an increase in visual acuity (VA) was observed during the last examination compared to the initial examination and was significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CIS treatment was found to be effective and safe, as suggested in the management guidelines for severe BU. Biological therapy was also found effective for the improvement of the VA. We observed that 58.7% of cases could be treated with strong immunosuppressive therapies, however, nearly half of the patients could have lost their VA if BAs were not existent. During the treatment course of severe cases with BU, classical therapy stage must still be protected as the first-line therapy due to the their reasonable activity and safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6173844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61738442018-10-15 Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents Celiker, Hande Kazokoglu, Haluk Direskeneli, Haner BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To report the switch rate of conventional immunosuppressive (CIS) therapies to the biological agents (BA) in patients with refractory Behcet’s uveitis (BU). METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical records were reviewed of 76 patients’ 116 eyes presenting with BU who had been treated with immunosuppressive drug therapy. Mann Whitney U test was used for the intergroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution as well as calculation of descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency and rate). Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was used for the intragroup comparisons of parameters without normal distribution. Pearson’s Chi-Square test and Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used for the comparisons of qualitative data. RESULTS: Except for one, all patients were first treated with CIS regimens for BU. Thirty-one patients (41.3%) who were unresponsive to CIS regimens were switched to IFNα2a therapy. After that, eight of these cases were switched to the anti-TNF-α treatments. The presence of initial ocular complications were found to be statistically higher in BA treated patients than the CIS treated cases (p < 0.001). Both in CIS treated and in BA treated cases, an increase in visual acuity (VA) was observed during the last examination compared to the initial examination and was significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CIS treatment was found to be effective and safe, as suggested in the management guidelines for severe BU. Biological therapy was also found effective for the improvement of the VA. We observed that 58.7% of cases could be treated with strong immunosuppressive therapies, however, nearly half of the patients could have lost their VA if BAs were not existent. During the treatment course of severe cases with BU, classical therapy stage must still be protected as the first-line therapy due to the their reasonable activity and safety. BioMed Central 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6173844/ /pubmed/30290779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0929-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Celiker, Hande Kazokoglu, Haluk Direskeneli, Haner Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents |
title | Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents |
title_full | Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents |
title_fullStr | Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents |
title_full_unstemmed | Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents |
title_short | Conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe Behcet’s Uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents |
title_sort | conventional immunosuppressive therapy in severe behcet’s uveitis: the switch rate to the biological agents |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0929-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT celikerhande conventionalimmunosuppressivetherapyinseverebehcetsuveitistheswitchratetothebiologicalagents AT kazokogluhaluk conventionalimmunosuppressivetherapyinseverebehcetsuveitistheswitchratetothebiologicalagents AT direskenelihaner conventionalimmunosuppressivetherapyinseverebehcetsuveitistheswitchratetothebiologicalagents |