Cargando…

Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate if patient- and provider-collected vaginal swabs in pregnant women reflect similar bacterial community characteristics. Pregnant patients performed a self-collected vaginal swab, then underwent a provider-collected swab via speculum exam. DNA pyrosequencing of the 16S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wylie, Kristine M., Blankenship, Stephanie A., Tuuli, Methodius G., Macones, George A., Stout, Molly J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3809-4
_version_ 1783361210063781888
author Wylie, Kristine M.
Blankenship, Stephanie A.
Tuuli, Methodius G.
Macones, George A.
Stout, Molly J.
author_facet Wylie, Kristine M.
Blankenship, Stephanie A.
Tuuli, Methodius G.
Macones, George A.
Stout, Molly J.
author_sort Wylie, Kristine M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate if patient- and provider-collected vaginal swabs in pregnant women reflect similar bacterial community characteristics. Pregnant patients performed a self-collected vaginal swab, then underwent a provider-collected swab via speculum exam. DNA pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V1V3 and V3V5 variable regions was performed. Relative abundance of taxa, alpha diversity, and beta diversity of patient- and provider-collected swabs were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-four vaginal swabs from 47 women were analyzed. On non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plots, paired patient- and provider-collected swabs clustered closely. The median Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.993 (interquartile range 0.951–0.999) for V1V3 and 0.987 (interquartile range 0.902–0.999) for V3V5. Among paired V1V3 and V3V5 sequences, 83.0% and 73.9% showed strong Pearson correlation (> 0.9), respectively, between patient- and provider-collected swabs; V1V3 and V3V5 sequences with weaker Pearson correlation (< 0.9) had correlation coefficients 0.57–0.89 and 0.49–0.89, respectively. No taxa were preferentially detected by sampling method, with relative abundance of taxa highly conserved. No significant difference in Shannon diversity for V1V3 (p = 0.22) and V3V5 (p = 0.11) sequences among paired samples was seen. We demonstrate that bacterial communities defined from patient- and provider-collected vaginal swabs in pregnant women are similar, validating utilization of patient-collected swabs for vaginal bacterial microbiome sampling during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6173906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61739062018-10-15 Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy Wylie, Kristine M. Blankenship, Stephanie A. Tuuli, Methodius G. Macones, George A. Stout, Molly J. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate if patient- and provider-collected vaginal swabs in pregnant women reflect similar bacterial community characteristics. Pregnant patients performed a self-collected vaginal swab, then underwent a provider-collected swab via speculum exam. DNA pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V1V3 and V3V5 variable regions was performed. Relative abundance of taxa, alpha diversity, and beta diversity of patient- and provider-collected swabs were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-four vaginal swabs from 47 women were analyzed. On non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plots, paired patient- and provider-collected swabs clustered closely. The median Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.993 (interquartile range 0.951–0.999) for V1V3 and 0.987 (interquartile range 0.902–0.999) for V3V5. Among paired V1V3 and V3V5 sequences, 83.0% and 73.9% showed strong Pearson correlation (> 0.9), respectively, between patient- and provider-collected swabs; V1V3 and V3V5 sequences with weaker Pearson correlation (< 0.9) had correlation coefficients 0.57–0.89 and 0.49–0.89, respectively. No taxa were preferentially detected by sampling method, with relative abundance of taxa highly conserved. No significant difference in Shannon diversity for V1V3 (p = 0.22) and V3V5 (p = 0.11) sequences among paired samples was seen. We demonstrate that bacterial communities defined from patient- and provider-collected vaginal swabs in pregnant women are similar, validating utilization of patient-collected swabs for vaginal bacterial microbiome sampling during pregnancy. BioMed Central 2018-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6173906/ /pubmed/30290831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3809-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Wylie, Kristine M.
Blankenship, Stephanie A.
Tuuli, Methodius G.
Macones, George A.
Stout, Molly J.
Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy
title Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy
title_full Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy
title_fullStr Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy
title_short Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy
title_sort evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30290831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3809-4
work_keys_str_mv AT wyliekristinem evaluationofpatientversusprovidercollectedvaginalswabsformicrobiomeanalysisduringpregnancy
AT blankenshipstephaniea evaluationofpatientversusprovidercollectedvaginalswabsformicrobiomeanalysisduringpregnancy
AT tuulimethodiusg evaluationofpatientversusprovidercollectedvaginalswabsformicrobiomeanalysisduringpregnancy
AT maconesgeorgea evaluationofpatientversusprovidercollectedvaginalswabsformicrobiomeanalysisduringpregnancy
AT stoutmollyj evaluationofpatientversusprovidercollectedvaginalswabsformicrobiomeanalysisduringpregnancy