Cargando…

Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries

Background: Profits in the biopharmaceutical industry have been scrutinized in social debate. However, drawing conclusions based on industry profitability only is inappropriate as such an analysis does not account for risks faced by investors. This study aims to measure risks and returns in the biop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popa, Cedric, Holvoet, Karel, Van Montfort, Tessa, Groeneveld, Floris, Simoens, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327601
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01108
_version_ 1783361250281914368
author Popa, Cedric
Holvoet, Karel
Van Montfort, Tessa
Groeneveld, Floris
Simoens, Steven
author_facet Popa, Cedric
Holvoet, Karel
Van Montfort, Tessa
Groeneveld, Floris
Simoens, Steven
author_sort Popa, Cedric
collection PubMed
description Background: Profits in the biopharmaceutical industry have been scrutinized in social debate. However, drawing conclusions based on industry profitability only is inappropriate as such an analysis does not account for risks faced by investors. This study aims to measure risks and returns in the biopharmaceutical industry and investigates whether risk-adjusted return on investment in the biopharmaceutical industry is higher than that in other industries. Methods: To enable appropriate comparison, we identified six benchmark industries with characteristics that match those of the biopharmaceutical industry: automotive manufacturing, commercial aircraft manufacturing, consumer electronics, packaged food manufacturing, telecom, and oil and gas. For those industries, we selected the top 25 companies per industry, covering 35–65% of industry revenues. Data on return measures (i.e., net profit margin, return on equity, total shareholder return) and risk measures (i.e., volatility of total shareholder return, beta) were derived from Bloomberg over the 2004–2016 period. The Sharpe ratio was calculated as a measure of risk-adjusted return on investment and compared between industries. Results: Net profit margins varied between 12.6 and 19.5% in the biopharmaceutical industry, and ranged from 2.6 to 8.4% in the benchmark industries. Return on equity for the biopharmaceutical industry was above the average for the other industries. Total shareholder returns for the biopharmaceutical industry amounted to 11.7%, ranking fifth across the seven industries. The biopharmaceutical industry ranked sixth among the seven industries regarding beta, and sixth in terms of volatility of total shareholder return. The median Sharpe value for the biopharmaceutical industry ranked fifth of seven industries. Conclusion: Over the 2004–2016 period, the biopharmaceutical industry did not attain risk-adjusted return on investment in excess of that in other industries and, thus, did not outperform these industries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6174211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61742112018-10-16 Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries Popa, Cedric Holvoet, Karel Van Montfort, Tessa Groeneveld, Floris Simoens, Steven Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Profits in the biopharmaceutical industry have been scrutinized in social debate. However, drawing conclusions based on industry profitability only is inappropriate as such an analysis does not account for risks faced by investors. This study aims to measure risks and returns in the biopharmaceutical industry and investigates whether risk-adjusted return on investment in the biopharmaceutical industry is higher than that in other industries. Methods: To enable appropriate comparison, we identified six benchmark industries with characteristics that match those of the biopharmaceutical industry: automotive manufacturing, commercial aircraft manufacturing, consumer electronics, packaged food manufacturing, telecom, and oil and gas. For those industries, we selected the top 25 companies per industry, covering 35–65% of industry revenues. Data on return measures (i.e., net profit margin, return on equity, total shareholder return) and risk measures (i.e., volatility of total shareholder return, beta) were derived from Bloomberg over the 2004–2016 period. The Sharpe ratio was calculated as a measure of risk-adjusted return on investment and compared between industries. Results: Net profit margins varied between 12.6 and 19.5% in the biopharmaceutical industry, and ranged from 2.6 to 8.4% in the benchmark industries. Return on equity for the biopharmaceutical industry was above the average for the other industries. Total shareholder returns for the biopharmaceutical industry amounted to 11.7%, ranking fifth across the seven industries. The biopharmaceutical industry ranked sixth among the seven industries regarding beta, and sixth in terms of volatility of total shareholder return. The median Sharpe value for the biopharmaceutical industry ranked fifth of seven industries. Conclusion: Over the 2004–2016 period, the biopharmaceutical industry did not attain risk-adjusted return on investment in excess of that in other industries and, thus, did not outperform these industries. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6174211/ /pubmed/30327601 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01108 Text en Copyright © 2018 Popa, Holvoet, Van Montfort, Groeneveld and Simoens. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Popa, Cedric
Holvoet, Karel
Van Montfort, Tessa
Groeneveld, Floris
Simoens, Steven
Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries
title Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries
title_full Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries
title_fullStr Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries
title_full_unstemmed Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries
title_short Risk-Return Analysis of the Biopharmaceutical Industry as Compared to Other Industries
title_sort risk-return analysis of the biopharmaceutical industry as compared to other industries
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30327601
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01108
work_keys_str_mv AT popacedric riskreturnanalysisofthebiopharmaceuticalindustryascomparedtootherindustries
AT holvoetkarel riskreturnanalysisofthebiopharmaceuticalindustryascomparedtootherindustries
AT vanmontforttessa riskreturnanalysisofthebiopharmaceuticalindustryascomparedtootherindustries
AT groeneveldfloris riskreturnanalysisofthebiopharmaceuticalindustryascomparedtootherindustries
AT simoenssteven riskreturnanalysisofthebiopharmaceuticalindustryascomparedtootherindustries