Cargando…

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous catheter drainage in high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: 11 hospitals in the Netherlands, February 2011 to January 2016. PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loozen, Charlotte S, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C, van Duijvendijk, Peter, Besselink, Marc GH, Gouma, Dirk J, Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP, Kelder, Johannes C, Donkervoort, Sandra C, van Geloven, Anna AW, Kruyt, Philip M, Roos, Daphne, Kortram, Kirsten, Kornmann, Verena NN, Pronk, Apollo, van der Peet, Donald L, Crolla, Rogier MPH, van Ramshorst, Bert, Bollen, Thomas L, Boerma, Djamila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3965
_version_ 1783361277218783232
author Loozen, Charlotte S
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C
van Duijvendijk, Peter
Besselink, Marc GH
Gouma, Dirk J
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP
Kelder, Johannes C
Donkervoort, Sandra C
van Geloven, Anna AW
Kruyt, Philip M
Roos, Daphne
Kortram, Kirsten
Kornmann, Verena NN
Pronk, Apollo
van der Peet, Donald L
Crolla, Rogier MPH
van Ramshorst, Bert
Bollen, Thomas L
Boerma, Djamila
author_facet Loozen, Charlotte S
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C
van Duijvendijk, Peter
Besselink, Marc GH
Gouma, Dirk J
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP
Kelder, Johannes C
Donkervoort, Sandra C
van Geloven, Anna AW
Kruyt, Philip M
Roos, Daphne
Kortram, Kirsten
Kornmann, Verena NN
Pronk, Apollo
van der Peet, Donald L
Crolla, Rogier MPH
van Ramshorst, Bert
Bollen, Thomas L
Boerma, Djamila
author_sort Loozen, Charlotte S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous catheter drainage in high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: 11 hospitals in the Netherlands, February 2011 to January 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 142 high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis were randomly allocated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=66) or to percutaneous catheter drainage (n=68). High risk was defined as an acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 7 or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoints were death within one year and the occurrence of major complications, defined as infectious and cardiopulmonary complications within one month, need for reintervention (surgical, radiological, or endoscopic that had to be related to acute cholecystitis) within one year, or recurrent biliary disease within one year. RESULTS: The trial was concluded early after a planned interim analysis. The rate of death did not differ between the laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous catheter drainage group (3% v 9%, P=0.27), but major complications occurred in eight of 66 patients (12%) assigned to cholecystectomy and in 44 of 68 patients (65%) assigned to percutaneous drainage (risk ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.37; P<0.001). In the drainage group 45 patients (66%) required a reintervention compared with eight patients (12%) in the cholecystectomy group (P<0.001). Recurrent biliary disease occurred more often in the percutaneous drainage group (53% v 5%, P<0.001), and the median length of hospital stay was longer (9 days v 5 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with percutaneous catheter drainage reduced the rate of major complications in high risk patients with acute cholecystitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR2666.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6174331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61743312018-10-10 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial Loozen, Charlotte S van Santvoort, Hjalmar C van Duijvendijk, Peter Besselink, Marc GH Gouma, Dirk J Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Kelder, Johannes C Donkervoort, Sandra C van Geloven, Anna AW Kruyt, Philip M Roos, Daphne Kortram, Kirsten Kornmann, Verena NN Pronk, Apollo van der Peet, Donald L Crolla, Rogier MPH van Ramshorst, Bert Bollen, Thomas L Boerma, Djamila BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous catheter drainage in high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: 11 hospitals in the Netherlands, February 2011 to January 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 142 high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis were randomly allocated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=66) or to percutaneous catheter drainage (n=68). High risk was defined as an acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 7 or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoints were death within one year and the occurrence of major complications, defined as infectious and cardiopulmonary complications within one month, need for reintervention (surgical, radiological, or endoscopic that had to be related to acute cholecystitis) within one year, or recurrent biliary disease within one year. RESULTS: The trial was concluded early after a planned interim analysis. The rate of death did not differ between the laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous catheter drainage group (3% v 9%, P=0.27), but major complications occurred in eight of 66 patients (12%) assigned to cholecystectomy and in 44 of 68 patients (65%) assigned to percutaneous drainage (risk ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.37; P<0.001). In the drainage group 45 patients (66%) required a reintervention compared with eight patients (12%) in the cholecystectomy group (P<0.001). Recurrent biliary disease occurred more often in the percutaneous drainage group (53% v 5%, P<0.001), and the median length of hospital stay was longer (9 days v 5 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with percutaneous catheter drainage reduced the rate of major complications in high risk patients with acute cholecystitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR2666. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6174331/ /pubmed/30297544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3965 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Loozen, Charlotte S
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C
van Duijvendijk, Peter
Besselink, Marc GH
Gouma, Dirk J
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP
Kelder, Johannes C
Donkervoort, Sandra C
van Geloven, Anna AW
Kruyt, Philip M
Roos, Daphne
Kortram, Kirsten
Kornmann, Verena NN
Pronk, Apollo
van der Peet, Donald L
Crolla, Rogier MPH
van Ramshorst, Bert
Bollen, Thomas L
Boerma, Djamila
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_full Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_short Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_sort laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (chocolate): multicentre randomised clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3965
work_keys_str_mv AT loozencharlottes laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vansantvoorthjalmarc laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vanduijvendijkpeter laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT besselinkmarcgh laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT goumadirkj laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT nieuwenhuijzengrardap laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT kelderjohannesc laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT donkervoortsandrac laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vangelovenannaaw laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT kruytphilipm laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT roosdaphne laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT kortramkirsten laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT kornmannverenann laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT pronkapollo laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vanderpeetdonaldl laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT crollarogiermph laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vanramshorstbert laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT bollenthomasl laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT boermadjamila laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial