Cargando…
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous catheter drainage in high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: 11 hospitals in the Netherlands, February 2011 to January 2016. PA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3965 |
_version_ | 1783361277218783232 |
---|---|
author | Loozen, Charlotte S van Santvoort, Hjalmar C van Duijvendijk, Peter Besselink, Marc GH Gouma, Dirk J Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Kelder, Johannes C Donkervoort, Sandra C van Geloven, Anna AW Kruyt, Philip M Roos, Daphne Kortram, Kirsten Kornmann, Verena NN Pronk, Apollo van der Peet, Donald L Crolla, Rogier MPH van Ramshorst, Bert Bollen, Thomas L Boerma, Djamila |
author_facet | Loozen, Charlotte S van Santvoort, Hjalmar C van Duijvendijk, Peter Besselink, Marc GH Gouma, Dirk J Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Kelder, Johannes C Donkervoort, Sandra C van Geloven, Anna AW Kruyt, Philip M Roos, Daphne Kortram, Kirsten Kornmann, Verena NN Pronk, Apollo van der Peet, Donald L Crolla, Rogier MPH van Ramshorst, Bert Bollen, Thomas L Boerma, Djamila |
author_sort | Loozen, Charlotte S |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous catheter drainage in high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: 11 hospitals in the Netherlands, February 2011 to January 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 142 high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis were randomly allocated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=66) or to percutaneous catheter drainage (n=68). High risk was defined as an acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 7 or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoints were death within one year and the occurrence of major complications, defined as infectious and cardiopulmonary complications within one month, need for reintervention (surgical, radiological, or endoscopic that had to be related to acute cholecystitis) within one year, or recurrent biliary disease within one year. RESULTS: The trial was concluded early after a planned interim analysis. The rate of death did not differ between the laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous catheter drainage group (3% v 9%, P=0.27), but major complications occurred in eight of 66 patients (12%) assigned to cholecystectomy and in 44 of 68 patients (65%) assigned to percutaneous drainage (risk ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.37; P<0.001). In the drainage group 45 patients (66%) required a reintervention compared with eight patients (12%) in the cholecystectomy group (P<0.001). Recurrent biliary disease occurred more often in the percutaneous drainage group (53% v 5%, P<0.001), and the median length of hospital stay was longer (9 days v 5 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with percutaneous catheter drainage reduced the rate of major complications in high risk patients with acute cholecystitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR2666. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6174331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61743312018-10-10 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial Loozen, Charlotte S van Santvoort, Hjalmar C van Duijvendijk, Peter Besselink, Marc GH Gouma, Dirk J Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Kelder, Johannes C Donkervoort, Sandra C van Geloven, Anna AW Kruyt, Philip M Roos, Daphne Kortram, Kirsten Kornmann, Verena NN Pronk, Apollo van der Peet, Donald L Crolla, Rogier MPH van Ramshorst, Bert Bollen, Thomas L Boerma, Djamila BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To assess whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous catheter drainage in high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: 11 hospitals in the Netherlands, February 2011 to January 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 142 high risk patients with acute calculous cholecystitis were randomly allocated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=66) or to percutaneous catheter drainage (n=68). High risk was defined as an acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 7 or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoints were death within one year and the occurrence of major complications, defined as infectious and cardiopulmonary complications within one month, need for reintervention (surgical, radiological, or endoscopic that had to be related to acute cholecystitis) within one year, or recurrent biliary disease within one year. RESULTS: The trial was concluded early after a planned interim analysis. The rate of death did not differ between the laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous catheter drainage group (3% v 9%, P=0.27), but major complications occurred in eight of 66 patients (12%) assigned to cholecystectomy and in 44 of 68 patients (65%) assigned to percutaneous drainage (risk ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.37; P<0.001). In the drainage group 45 patients (66%) required a reintervention compared with eight patients (12%) in the cholecystectomy group (P<0.001). Recurrent biliary disease occurred more often in the percutaneous drainage group (53% v 5%, P<0.001), and the median length of hospital stay was longer (9 days v 5 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with percutaneous catheter drainage reduced the rate of major complications in high risk patients with acute cholecystitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR2666. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6174331/ /pubmed/30297544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3965 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Loozen, Charlotte S van Santvoort, Hjalmar C van Duijvendijk, Peter Besselink, Marc GH Gouma, Dirk J Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard AP Kelder, Johannes C Donkervoort, Sandra C van Geloven, Anna AW Kruyt, Philip M Roos, Daphne Kortram, Kirsten Kornmann, Verena NN Pronk, Apollo van der Peet, Donald L Crolla, Rogier MPH van Ramshorst, Bert Bollen, Thomas L Boerma, Djamila Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial |
title | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (chocolate): multicentre randomised clinical trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loozencharlottes laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT vansantvoorthjalmarc laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT vanduijvendijkpeter laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT besselinkmarcgh laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT goumadirkj laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT nieuwenhuijzengrardap laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT kelderjohannesc laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT donkervoortsandrac laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT vangelovenannaaw laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT kruytphilipm laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT roosdaphne laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT kortramkirsten laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT kornmannverenann laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT pronkapollo laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT vanderpeetdonaldl laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT crollarogiermph laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT vanramshorstbert laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT bollenthomasl laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial AT boermadjamila laparoscopiccholecystectomyversuspercutaneouscatheterdrainageforacutecholecystitisinhighriskpatientschocolatemulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial |