Cargando…

Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manoharan, Vignesh, Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan, Kumar, Santosh, Kakkar, Nandita, Devana, Sudheer Kumar, Bora, Girdhar Singh, Singh, Shrawan Kumar, Mandal, Arup Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30337782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17
_version_ 1783361326582595584
author Manoharan, Vignesh
Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan
Kumar, Santosh
Kakkar, Nandita
Devana, Sudheer Kumar
Bora, Girdhar Singh
Singh, Shrawan Kumar
Mandal, Arup Kumar
author_facet Manoharan, Vignesh
Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan
Kumar, Santosh
Kakkar, Nandita
Devana, Sudheer Kumar
Bora, Girdhar Singh
Singh, Shrawan Kumar
Mandal, Arup Kumar
author_sort Manoharan, Vignesh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the times. This study was performed with an aim to better define the utility of restage TURBT in a tertiary care hospital of India. METHODS: Patients with high grade/T1 tumors at the first TURBT were prospectively enrolled. Their demographic profile, previous cystoscopic findings, and histological reports were recorded. The primary objective was to assess the tumor detection and stage up-migration rates at restage TURBT. The secondary objectives was to identify factors predicting presence of tumor at restage TURBT. Patients were followed up to detect recurrence and progression for a minimum of 3 months. RESULTS: Of 128 prospective patients’ enrolled, 29 patients were lost to follow-up and 11 patients did not undergo restage. A total of eighty-eight patients underwent restage TURBT of which twenty-eight patients (31.8%) had tumor at their second TURBT with five of these patients being upstaged to T2. The risk of having a tumor at restage was significantly higher in patients with solid tumors (56.2% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.035–0.024) but was independent of the tumor size (P = 0.472), number of growths (P = 0.267), grade of tumor (P = 0.441), presence or absence of muscle at the initial TURBT (P = 0.371) and place of initial TURBT (P = 0.289). There was a significant difference in the recurrence and progression rates in patients who had tumor at restage as compared to those who did not (recurrence; 33.3% and 23.8%, P = 0.022, respectively vs. progression; 11.1% and 3.7% respectively, P = 0.07; mean follow-up = 10.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that restage TURBT is necessary in patients with solid looking tumors and the presence of tumor at restage confers a higher risk of recurrence and progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6174718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61747182018-10-18 Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor Manoharan, Vignesh Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan Kumar, Santosh Kakkar, Nandita Devana, Sudheer Kumar Bora, Girdhar Singh Singh, Shrawan Kumar Mandal, Arup Kumar Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the times. This study was performed with an aim to better define the utility of restage TURBT in a tertiary care hospital of India. METHODS: Patients with high grade/T1 tumors at the first TURBT were prospectively enrolled. Their demographic profile, previous cystoscopic findings, and histological reports were recorded. The primary objective was to assess the tumor detection and stage up-migration rates at restage TURBT. The secondary objectives was to identify factors predicting presence of tumor at restage TURBT. Patients were followed up to detect recurrence and progression for a minimum of 3 months. RESULTS: Of 128 prospective patients’ enrolled, 29 patients were lost to follow-up and 11 patients did not undergo restage. A total of eighty-eight patients underwent restage TURBT of which twenty-eight patients (31.8%) had tumor at their second TURBT with five of these patients being upstaged to T2. The risk of having a tumor at restage was significantly higher in patients with solid tumors (56.2% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.035–0.024) but was independent of the tumor size (P = 0.472), number of growths (P = 0.267), grade of tumor (P = 0.441), presence or absence of muscle at the initial TURBT (P = 0.371) and place of initial TURBT (P = 0.289). There was a significant difference in the recurrence and progression rates in patients who had tumor at restage as compared to those who did not (recurrence; 33.3% and 23.8%, P = 0.022, respectively vs. progression; 11.1% and 3.7% respectively, P = 0.07; mean follow-up = 10.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that restage TURBT is necessary in patients with solid looking tumors and the presence of tumor at restage confers a higher risk of recurrence and progression. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6174718/ /pubmed/30337782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Manoharan, Vignesh
Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan
Kumar, Santosh
Kakkar, Nandita
Devana, Sudheer Kumar
Bora, Girdhar Singh
Singh, Shrawan Kumar
Mandal, Arup Kumar
Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
title Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
title_full Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
title_fullStr Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
title_full_unstemmed Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
title_short Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
title_sort utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30337782
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17
work_keys_str_mv AT manoharanvignesh utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor
AT mavudururavimohansuryanarayan utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor
AT kumarsantosh utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor
AT kakkarnandita utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor
AT devanasudheerkumar utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor
AT boragirdharsingh utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor
AT singhshrawankumar utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor
AT mandalarupkumar utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor