Cargando…
Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor
INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the time...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30337782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17 |
_version_ | 1783361326582595584 |
---|---|
author | Manoharan, Vignesh Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan Kumar, Santosh Kakkar, Nandita Devana, Sudheer Kumar Bora, Girdhar Singh Singh, Shrawan Kumar Mandal, Arup Kumar |
author_facet | Manoharan, Vignesh Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan Kumar, Santosh Kakkar, Nandita Devana, Sudheer Kumar Bora, Girdhar Singh Singh, Shrawan Kumar Mandal, Arup Kumar |
author_sort | Manoharan, Vignesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the times. This study was performed with an aim to better define the utility of restage TURBT in a tertiary care hospital of India. METHODS: Patients with high grade/T1 tumors at the first TURBT were prospectively enrolled. Their demographic profile, previous cystoscopic findings, and histological reports were recorded. The primary objective was to assess the tumor detection and stage up-migration rates at restage TURBT. The secondary objectives was to identify factors predicting presence of tumor at restage TURBT. Patients were followed up to detect recurrence and progression for a minimum of 3 months. RESULTS: Of 128 prospective patients’ enrolled, 29 patients were lost to follow-up and 11 patients did not undergo restage. A total of eighty-eight patients underwent restage TURBT of which twenty-eight patients (31.8%) had tumor at their second TURBT with five of these patients being upstaged to T2. The risk of having a tumor at restage was significantly higher in patients with solid tumors (56.2% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.035–0.024) but was independent of the tumor size (P = 0.472), number of growths (P = 0.267), grade of tumor (P = 0.441), presence or absence of muscle at the initial TURBT (P = 0.371) and place of initial TURBT (P = 0.289). There was a significant difference in the recurrence and progression rates in patients who had tumor at restage as compared to those who did not (recurrence; 33.3% and 23.8%, P = 0.022, respectively vs. progression; 11.1% and 3.7% respectively, P = 0.07; mean follow-up = 10.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that restage TURBT is necessary in patients with solid looking tumors and the presence of tumor at restage confers a higher risk of recurrence and progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6174718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61747182018-10-18 Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor Manoharan, Vignesh Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan Kumar, Santosh Kakkar, Nandita Devana, Sudheer Kumar Bora, Girdhar Singh Singh, Shrawan Kumar Mandal, Arup Kumar Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the times. This study was performed with an aim to better define the utility of restage TURBT in a tertiary care hospital of India. METHODS: Patients with high grade/T1 tumors at the first TURBT were prospectively enrolled. Their demographic profile, previous cystoscopic findings, and histological reports were recorded. The primary objective was to assess the tumor detection and stage up-migration rates at restage TURBT. The secondary objectives was to identify factors predicting presence of tumor at restage TURBT. Patients were followed up to detect recurrence and progression for a minimum of 3 months. RESULTS: Of 128 prospective patients’ enrolled, 29 patients were lost to follow-up and 11 patients did not undergo restage. A total of eighty-eight patients underwent restage TURBT of which twenty-eight patients (31.8%) had tumor at their second TURBT with five of these patients being upstaged to T2. The risk of having a tumor at restage was significantly higher in patients with solid tumors (56.2% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.035–0.024) but was independent of the tumor size (P = 0.472), number of growths (P = 0.267), grade of tumor (P = 0.441), presence or absence of muscle at the initial TURBT (P = 0.371) and place of initial TURBT (P = 0.289). There was a significant difference in the recurrence and progression rates in patients who had tumor at restage as compared to those who did not (recurrence; 33.3% and 23.8%, P = 0.022, respectively vs. progression; 11.1% and 3.7% respectively, P = 0.07; mean follow-up = 10.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that restage TURBT is necessary in patients with solid looking tumors and the presence of tumor at restage confers a higher risk of recurrence and progression. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6174718/ /pubmed/30337782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Manoharan, Vignesh Mavuduru, Ravimohan Suryanarayan Kumar, Santosh Kakkar, Nandita Devana, Sudheer Kumar Bora, Girdhar Singh Singh, Shrawan Kumar Mandal, Arup Kumar Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor |
title | Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor |
title_full | Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor |
title_fullStr | Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor |
title_full_unstemmed | Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor |
title_short | Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor |
title_sort | utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30337782 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manoharanvignesh utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor AT mavudururavimohansuryanarayan utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor AT kumarsantosh utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor AT kakkarnandita utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor AT devanasudheerkumar utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor AT boragirdharsingh utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor AT singhshrawankumar utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor AT mandalarupkumar utilityofrestagetransurethralresectionofbladdertumor |