Cargando…

LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations in patients with COPD: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence for long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in the treatment of COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials published i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogliani, Paola, Calzetta, Luigino, Braido, Fulvio, Cazzola, Mario, Clini, Enrico, Pelaia, Girolamo, Rossi, Andrea, Scichilone, Nicola, Di Marco, Fabiano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323582
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S170606
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence for long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in the treatment of COPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials published in English up to September 2017 of LABA/LAMA FDCs vs LABA or LAMA or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) FDCs in COPD patients was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Outcomes including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) scores, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, exacerbations, exercise tolerance (endurance time [ET]), inspiratory capacity (IC), and rescue medication use were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 27 studies were included in the review. LABA/LAMA FDCs significantly improved lung function (FEV(1)) at 12 weeks compared with LABA or LAMA or LABA/ICS. These effects were maintained over time. Significant improvements with LABA/LAMA FDCs vs each evaluated comparator were also observed in TDI and SGRQ scores, even if significant differences between different LABA/LAMA FDCs were detected. Only the LABA/LAMA FDC indacaterol/glycopyrronium has shown superiority vs LAMA and LABA/ICS for reducing exacerbation rates, while olodaterol/tiotropium and indacaterol/glycopyrronium have been shown to improve ET and IC vs the active comparators. Rescue medication use was significantly reduced by LABA/LAMA FDCs vs the evaluated comparators. LABA/LAMA FDCs were safe, with no increase in the risk of adverse events with LABA/LAMA FDCs vs the monocomponents. CONCLUSION: Evidence supporting the efficacy of LABA/LAMA FDCs for COPD is heterogeneous, particularly for TDI and SGRQ scores, exacerbation rates, ET, and IC. So far, indacaterol/glycopyrronium is the LABA/LAMA FDC that has the strongest evidence for superiority vs LABA, LAMA, and LABA/ICS FDCs across the evaluated outcomes. LABA/LAMA FDCs were safe; however, more data should be collected in a real-world setting to confirm their safety.