Cargando…

The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory

OBJECTIVES: Depression is characterized by a range of systematic negative biases in thinking and information processing. These biases are believed to play a causal role in the aetiology and maintenance of depression, and it has been proposed that the combined effect of cognitive biases may have grea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orchard, Faith, Reynolds, Shirley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29799126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12184
_version_ 1783361420508790784
author Orchard, Faith
Reynolds, Shirley
author_facet Orchard, Faith
Reynolds, Shirley
author_sort Orchard, Faith
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Depression is characterized by a range of systematic negative biases in thinking and information processing. These biases are believed to play a causal role in the aetiology and maintenance of depression, and it has been proposed that the combined effect of cognitive biases may have greater impact on depression than individual biases alone. Yet little is known about how these biases interact during adolescence when onset is most common. METHODS: In this study, adolescents were recruited from the community (n = 212) and from a Child And Adolescent Mental Health Service (n = 84). Participants completed measures of depressive symptoms, interpretation bias, self‐evaluation, and recall memory. These included the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, Ambiguous Scenarios Test for Depression in Adolescents, Self‐Description Questionnaire, and an immediate recall task. The clinically referred sample also took part in a formal diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Individual cognitive biases were significantly intercorrelated and associated with depression severity. The combination of cognitive biases was a stronger predictor of depression severity than individual biases alone, predicting 60% of the variance in depression severity across all participants. There were two significant predictors, interpretation bias and negative self‐evaluation; however, almost all of the variance was explained by negative self‐evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the interrelationship and additive effect of biases in explaining depression and suggest that understanding the way in which cognitive biases interact could be important in advancing methods of identification, early intervention, and treatment. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A combination of biases was a better predictor of depression symptom severity than individual biases. Interpretation and self‐evaluation were better predictors of depression symptom severity than recall. Negative self‐evaluation was the strongest individual predictor of depression symptom severity. Negative self‐evaluation was able to classify depressed from non‐depressed adolescents. The cross‐sectional design of the study precludes any conclusions about the potential causal role of these variables. Different tasks were used to assess different types of cognitive bias meaning that the possible linear operation along an information processing ‘pathway’ could not be examined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6175080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61750802018-10-15 The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory Orchard, Faith Reynolds, Shirley Br J Clin Psychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Depression is characterized by a range of systematic negative biases in thinking and information processing. These biases are believed to play a causal role in the aetiology and maintenance of depression, and it has been proposed that the combined effect of cognitive biases may have greater impact on depression than individual biases alone. Yet little is known about how these biases interact during adolescence when onset is most common. METHODS: In this study, adolescents were recruited from the community (n = 212) and from a Child And Adolescent Mental Health Service (n = 84). Participants completed measures of depressive symptoms, interpretation bias, self‐evaluation, and recall memory. These included the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, Ambiguous Scenarios Test for Depression in Adolescents, Self‐Description Questionnaire, and an immediate recall task. The clinically referred sample also took part in a formal diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Individual cognitive biases were significantly intercorrelated and associated with depression severity. The combination of cognitive biases was a stronger predictor of depression severity than individual biases alone, predicting 60% of the variance in depression severity across all participants. There were two significant predictors, interpretation bias and negative self‐evaluation; however, almost all of the variance was explained by negative self‐evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the interrelationship and additive effect of biases in explaining depression and suggest that understanding the way in which cognitive biases interact could be important in advancing methods of identification, early intervention, and treatment. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A combination of biases was a better predictor of depression symptom severity than individual biases. Interpretation and self‐evaluation were better predictors of depression symptom severity than recall. Negative self‐evaluation was the strongest individual predictor of depression symptom severity. Negative self‐evaluation was able to classify depressed from non‐depressed adolescents. The cross‐sectional design of the study precludes any conclusions about the potential causal role of these variables. Different tasks were used to assess different types of cognitive bias meaning that the possible linear operation along an information processing ‘pathway’ could not be examined. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-25 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6175080/ /pubmed/29799126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12184 Text en © 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Orchard, Faith
Reynolds, Shirley
The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory
title The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory
title_full The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory
title_fullStr The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory
title_full_unstemmed The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory
title_short The combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: Biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory
title_sort combined influence of cognitions in adolescent depression: biases of interpretation, self‐evaluation, and memory
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29799126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12184
work_keys_str_mv AT orchardfaith thecombinedinfluenceofcognitionsinadolescentdepressionbiasesofinterpretationselfevaluationandmemory
AT reynoldsshirley thecombinedinfluenceofcognitionsinadolescentdepressionbiasesofinterpretationselfevaluationandmemory
AT orchardfaith combinedinfluenceofcognitionsinadolescentdepressionbiasesofinterpretationselfevaluationandmemory
AT reynoldsshirley combinedinfluenceofcognitionsinadolescentdepressionbiasesofinterpretationselfevaluationandmemory