Cargando…

Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings

The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scientific ende...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKay, Virginia R., Morshed, Alexandra B., Brownson, Ross C., Proctor, Enola K., Prusaczyk, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12258
_version_ 1783361451936710656
author McKay, Virginia R.
Morshed, Alexandra B.
Brownson, Ross C.
Proctor, Enola K.
Prusaczyk, Beth
author_facet McKay, Virginia R.
Morshed, Alexandra B.
Brownson, Ross C.
Proctor, Enola K.
Prusaczyk, Beth
author_sort McKay, Virginia R.
collection PubMed
description The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scientific endeavors. Given the infancy of de‐implementation, this conceptual narrative provides a definition and criteria for determining if an intervention should be de‐implemented. We identify three criteria for identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation: (a) interventions that are not effective or harmful, (b) interventions that are not the most effective or efficient to provide, and (c) interventions that are no longer necessary. Detailed, well‐documented examples illustrate each of the criteria. We describe de‐implementation frameworks, but also demonstrate how other existing implementation frameworks might be applied to de‐implementation research as a supplement. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of de‐implementation in the context of other stages of implementation, like sustainability and adoption; next steps for de‐implementation research, especially identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation in a systematic manner; and highlight special ethical considerations to advance the field of de‐implementation research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6175194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61751942018-10-15 Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings McKay, Virginia R. Morshed, Alexandra B. Brownson, Ross C. Proctor, Enola K. Prusaczyk, Beth Am J Community Psychol Empirical Reviews The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scientific endeavors. Given the infancy of de‐implementation, this conceptual narrative provides a definition and criteria for determining if an intervention should be de‐implemented. We identify three criteria for identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation: (a) interventions that are not effective or harmful, (b) interventions that are not the most effective or efficient to provide, and (c) interventions that are no longer necessary. Detailed, well‐documented examples illustrate each of the criteria. We describe de‐implementation frameworks, but also demonstrate how other existing implementation frameworks might be applied to de‐implementation research as a supplement. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of de‐implementation in the context of other stages of implementation, like sustainability and adoption; next steps for de‐implementation research, especially identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation in a systematic manner; and highlight special ethical considerations to advance the field of de‐implementation research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-03 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6175194/ /pubmed/29971792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12258 Text en © 2018 The Authors. American Journal of Community Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Community Research and Action This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Empirical Reviews
McKay, Virginia R.
Morshed, Alexandra B.
Brownson, Ross C.
Proctor, Enola K.
Prusaczyk, Beth
Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings
title Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings
title_full Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings
title_fullStr Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings
title_full_unstemmed Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings
title_short Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings
title_sort letting go: conceptualizing intervention de‐implementation in public health and social service settings
topic Empirical Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12258
work_keys_str_mv AT mckayvirginiar lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings
AT morshedalexandrab lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings
AT brownsonrossc lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings
AT proctorenolak lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings
AT prusaczykbeth lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings