Cargando…
Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings
The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scientific ende...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12258 |
_version_ | 1783361451936710656 |
---|---|
author | McKay, Virginia R. Morshed, Alexandra B. Brownson, Ross C. Proctor, Enola K. Prusaczyk, Beth |
author_facet | McKay, Virginia R. Morshed, Alexandra B. Brownson, Ross C. Proctor, Enola K. Prusaczyk, Beth |
author_sort | McKay, Virginia R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scientific endeavors. Given the infancy of de‐implementation, this conceptual narrative provides a definition and criteria for determining if an intervention should be de‐implemented. We identify three criteria for identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation: (a) interventions that are not effective or harmful, (b) interventions that are not the most effective or efficient to provide, and (c) interventions that are no longer necessary. Detailed, well‐documented examples illustrate each of the criteria. We describe de‐implementation frameworks, but also demonstrate how other existing implementation frameworks might be applied to de‐implementation research as a supplement. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of de‐implementation in the context of other stages of implementation, like sustainability and adoption; next steps for de‐implementation research, especially identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation in a systematic manner; and highlight special ethical considerations to advance the field of de‐implementation research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6175194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61751942018-10-15 Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings McKay, Virginia R. Morshed, Alexandra B. Brownson, Ross C. Proctor, Enola K. Prusaczyk, Beth Am J Community Psychol Empirical Reviews The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scientific endeavors. Given the infancy of de‐implementation, this conceptual narrative provides a definition and criteria for determining if an intervention should be de‐implemented. We identify three criteria for identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation: (a) interventions that are not effective or harmful, (b) interventions that are not the most effective or efficient to provide, and (c) interventions that are no longer necessary. Detailed, well‐documented examples illustrate each of the criteria. We describe de‐implementation frameworks, but also demonstrate how other existing implementation frameworks might be applied to de‐implementation research as a supplement. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of de‐implementation in the context of other stages of implementation, like sustainability and adoption; next steps for de‐implementation research, especially identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation in a systematic manner; and highlight special ethical considerations to advance the field of de‐implementation research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-03 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6175194/ /pubmed/29971792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12258 Text en © 2018 The Authors. American Journal of Community Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Community Research and Action This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Empirical Reviews McKay, Virginia R. Morshed, Alexandra B. Brownson, Ross C. Proctor, Enola K. Prusaczyk, Beth Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings |
title | Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings |
title_full | Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings |
title_fullStr | Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings |
title_short | Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings |
title_sort | letting go: conceptualizing intervention de‐implementation in public health and social service settings |
topic | Empirical Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29971792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mckayvirginiar lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings AT morshedalexandrab lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings AT brownsonrossc lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings AT proctorenolak lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings AT prusaczykbeth lettinggoconceptualizinginterventiondeimplementationinpublichealthandsocialservicesettings |