Cargando…

The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Generic self‐management programs aim to facilitate behavioural adjustment and therefore have considerable potential for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our main objective was to collect and synthesize all data on the effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elbers, S., Wittink, H., Pool, J.J.M., Smeets, R.J.E.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29845678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1253
_version_ 1783361481714171904
author Elbers, S.
Wittink, H.
Pool, J.J.M.
Smeets, R.J.E.M.
author_facet Elbers, S.
Wittink, H.
Pool, J.J.M.
Smeets, R.J.E.M.
author_sort Elbers, S.
collection PubMed
description Generic self‐management programs aim to facilitate behavioural adjustment and therefore have considerable potential for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our main objective was to collect and synthesize all data on the effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in terms of physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity. Our secondary objective was to describe the content of these interventions, by means of classification according to the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase and Psycinfo for eligible studies. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two researchers independently. Meta‐analyses were only performed if the studies were sufficiently homogeneous and GRADE was used to determine the quality of evidence. We identified 20 randomized controlled trials that compared a self‐management intervention to any type of control group. For post‐intervention results, there was moderate quality evidence of a statistically significant but clinically unimportant effect for physical function and pain intensity, both favouring the self‐management group. At follow‐up, there was moderate quality evidence of a small clinically insignificant effect for self‐efficacy, favouring the self‐management group. All other comparisons did not indicate an effect. Classification of the behaviour change techniques showed large heterogeneity across studies. These results indicate that generic self‐management interventions have a marginal benefit for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in the short‐term for physical function and pain intensity and for self‐efficacy in the long‐term, and vary considerably with respect to intervention content. SIGNIFICANCE: This study contributes to a growing body of evidence that generic self‐management interventions have limited effectiveness for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Furthermore, this study has identified substantial differences in both content and delivery mode across self‐management interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6175326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61753262018-10-15 The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Elbers, S. Wittink, H. Pool, J.J.M. Smeets, R.J.E.M. Eur J Pain Review Article Generic self‐management programs aim to facilitate behavioural adjustment and therefore have considerable potential for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Our main objective was to collect and synthesize all data on the effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in terms of physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity. Our secondary objective was to describe the content of these interventions, by means of classification according to the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy. We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase and Psycinfo for eligible studies. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias were assessed by two researchers independently. Meta‐analyses were only performed if the studies were sufficiently homogeneous and GRADE was used to determine the quality of evidence. We identified 20 randomized controlled trials that compared a self‐management intervention to any type of control group. For post‐intervention results, there was moderate quality evidence of a statistically significant but clinically unimportant effect for physical function and pain intensity, both favouring the self‐management group. At follow‐up, there was moderate quality evidence of a small clinically insignificant effect for self‐efficacy, favouring the self‐management group. All other comparisons did not indicate an effect. Classification of the behaviour change techniques showed large heterogeneity across studies. These results indicate that generic self‐management interventions have a marginal benefit for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in the short‐term for physical function and pain intensity and for self‐efficacy in the long‐term, and vary considerably with respect to intervention content. SIGNIFICANCE: This study contributes to a growing body of evidence that generic self‐management interventions have limited effectiveness for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Furthermore, this study has identified substantial differences in both content and delivery mode across self‐management interventions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-27 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6175326/ /pubmed/29845678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1253 Text en © 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation ‐ EFIC® This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Elbers, S.
Wittink, H.
Pool, J.J.M.
Smeets, R.J.E.M.
The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short The effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort effectiveness of generic self‐management interventions for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on physical function, self‐efficacy, pain intensity and physical activity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29845678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1253
work_keys_str_mv AT elberss theeffectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wittinkh theeffectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pooljjm theeffectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smeetsrjem theeffectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elberss effectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wittinkh effectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pooljjm effectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smeetsrjem effectivenessofgenericselfmanagementinterventionsforpatientswithchronicmusculoskeletalpainonphysicalfunctionselfefficacypainintensityandphysicalactivityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis