Cargando…
Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: Research has suggested beneficial effects of self‐regulated learning (SRL) for medical students' and residents' workplace‐based learning. Ideally, learners go through a cyclic process of setting learning goals, choosing learning strategies and assessing progress towards goals....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29943415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13615 |
_version_ | 1783361495672815616 |
---|---|
author | van Houten‐Schat, Maaike A Berkhout, Joris J van Dijk, Nynke Endedijk, Maaike D Jaarsma, A Debbie C Diemers, Agnes D |
author_facet | van Houten‐Schat, Maaike A Berkhout, Joris J van Dijk, Nynke Endedijk, Maaike D Jaarsma, A Debbie C Diemers, Agnes D |
author_sort | van Houten‐Schat, Maaike A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Research has suggested beneficial effects of self‐regulated learning (SRL) for medical students' and residents' workplace‐based learning. Ideally, learners go through a cyclic process of setting learning goals, choosing learning strategies and assessing progress towards goals. A clear overview of medical students' and residents' successful key strategies, influential factors and effective interventions to stimulate SRL in the workplace is missing. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of and a theoretical base for effective SRL strategies of medical students and residents for their learning in the clinical context. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Association for Medical Education in Europe. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC and the Cochrane Library from January 1992 to July 2016. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included. Two reviewers independently performed the review process and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. A total of 3341 publications were initially identified and 18 were included in the review. RESULTS: We found diversity in the use of SRL strategies by medical students and residents, which is linked to individual (goal setting), contextual (time pressure, patient care and supervision) and social (supervisors and peers) factors. Three types of intervention were identified (coaching, learning plans and supportive tools). However, all interventions focused on goal setting and monitoring and none on supporting self‐evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Self‐regulated learning in the clinical environment is a complex process that results from an interaction between person and context. Future research should focus on unravelling the process of SRL in the clinical context and specifically on how medical students and residents assess their progress towards goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6175376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61753762018-10-19 Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review van Houten‐Schat, Maaike A Berkhout, Joris J van Dijk, Nynke Endedijk, Maaike D Jaarsma, A Debbie C Diemers, Agnes D Med Educ Medical Education in Review OBJECTIVES: Research has suggested beneficial effects of self‐regulated learning (SRL) for medical students' and residents' workplace‐based learning. Ideally, learners go through a cyclic process of setting learning goals, choosing learning strategies and assessing progress towards goals. A clear overview of medical students' and residents' successful key strategies, influential factors and effective interventions to stimulate SRL in the workplace is missing. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of and a theoretical base for effective SRL strategies of medical students and residents for their learning in the clinical context. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines of the Association for Medical Education in Europe. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC and the Cochrane Library from January 1992 to July 2016. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included. Two reviewers independently performed the review process and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. A total of 3341 publications were initially identified and 18 were included in the review. RESULTS: We found diversity in the use of SRL strategies by medical students and residents, which is linked to individual (goal setting), contextual (time pressure, patient care and supervision) and social (supervisors and peers) factors. Three types of intervention were identified (coaching, learning plans and supportive tools). However, all interventions focused on goal setting and monitoring and none on supporting self‐evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Self‐regulated learning in the clinical environment is a complex process that results from an interaction between person and context. Future research should focus on unravelling the process of SRL in the clinical context and specifically on how medical students and residents assess their progress towards goals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-25 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6175376/ /pubmed/29943415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13615 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education in Review van Houten‐Schat, Maaike A Berkhout, Joris J van Dijk, Nynke Endedijk, Maaike D Jaarsma, A Debbie C Diemers, Agnes D Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review |
title | Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review |
title_full | Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review |
title_short | Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review |
title_sort | self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review |
topic | Medical Education in Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29943415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhoutenschatmaaikea selfregulatedlearningintheclinicalcontextasystematicreview AT berkhoutjorisj selfregulatedlearningintheclinicalcontextasystematicreview AT vandijknynke selfregulatedlearningintheclinicalcontextasystematicreview AT endedijkmaaiked selfregulatedlearningintheclinicalcontextasystematicreview AT jaarsmaadebbiec selfregulatedlearningintheclinicalcontextasystematicreview AT diemersagnesd selfregulatedlearningintheclinicalcontextasystematicreview |