Cargando…
How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Despite progress in the upfront treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients still experience relapses. Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard second‐line treatment for relapsed and refractory (R/R) DLBCL. However, half of the pat...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29808921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15412 |
_version_ | 1783361511907917824 |
---|---|
author | Gisselbrecht, Christian Van Den Neste, Eric |
author_facet | Gisselbrecht, Christian Van Den Neste, Eric |
author_sort | Gisselbrecht, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite progress in the upfront treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients still experience relapses. Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard second‐line treatment for relapsed and refractory (R/R) DLBCL. However, half of the patients will not be eligible for transplantation due to ineffective salvage treatment, and the other half will relapse after ASCT. In randomized studies, no salvage chemotherapy regimen is superior to another. The outcomes are affected by the secondary International Prognostic Index at relapse and various biological factors. The strategy is less clear in patients who require third‐line treatment. A multicohort retrospective non‐Hodgkin lymphoma research (SCHOLAR‐1) study conducted in 636 patients with refractory DLBCL showed an objective response rate of 26% (complete response 7%) to the next line of therapy with a median overall survival of 6·3 months. In the case of a response followed by transplantation, long‐term survival can be achieved in DLBCL patients. There is clearly a need for new drugs that improve salvage efficacy. Encouraging results have been reported with chimeric antigen receptor ‐T cell engineering, warranting further studies in a well‐defined control group of refractory patients. The Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) was used as a handy framework to build the discussion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6175435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61754352018-10-19 How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma Gisselbrecht, Christian Van Den Neste, Eric Br J Haematol Reviews Despite progress in the upfront treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients still experience relapses. Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard second‐line treatment for relapsed and refractory (R/R) DLBCL. However, half of the patients will not be eligible for transplantation due to ineffective salvage treatment, and the other half will relapse after ASCT. In randomized studies, no salvage chemotherapy regimen is superior to another. The outcomes are affected by the secondary International Prognostic Index at relapse and various biological factors. The strategy is less clear in patients who require third‐line treatment. A multicohort retrospective non‐Hodgkin lymphoma research (SCHOLAR‐1) study conducted in 636 patients with refractory DLBCL showed an objective response rate of 26% (complete response 7%) to the next line of therapy with a median overall survival of 6·3 months. In the case of a response followed by transplantation, long‐term survival can be achieved in DLBCL patients. There is clearly a need for new drugs that improve salvage efficacy. Encouraging results have been reported with chimeric antigen receptor ‐T cell engineering, warranting further studies in a well‐defined control group of refractory patients. The Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) was used as a handy framework to build the discussion. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-29 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6175435/ /pubmed/29808921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15412 Text en © 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and British Society for Haematology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Gisselbrecht, Christian Van Den Neste, Eric How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma |
title | How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma |
title_full | How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma |
title_fullStr | How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma |
title_short | How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma |
title_sort | how i manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large b cell lymphoma |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29808921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gisselbrechtchristian howimanagepatientswithrelapsedrefractorydiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT vandennesteeric howimanagepatientswithrelapsedrefractorydiffuselargebcelllymphoma |