Cargando…

Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus

Polyploidy is a recurrent feature of eukaryotic evolution and has been linked to increases in complexity, adaptive radiation and speciation. Within angiosperms such events have occurred repeatedly in many plant lineages. Here we investigate the retention and spatio‐temporal expression dynamics of du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, D. Marc, Wells, Rachel, Pullen, Nick, Trick, Martin, Irwin, Judith A., Morris, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29989238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14020
_version_ 1783361515678597120
author Jones, D. Marc
Wells, Rachel
Pullen, Nick
Trick, Martin
Irwin, Judith A.
Morris, Richard J.
author_facet Jones, D. Marc
Wells, Rachel
Pullen, Nick
Trick, Martin
Irwin, Judith A.
Morris, Richard J.
author_sort Jones, D. Marc
collection PubMed
description Polyploidy is a recurrent feature of eukaryotic evolution and has been linked to increases in complexity, adaptive radiation and speciation. Within angiosperms such events have occurred repeatedly in many plant lineages. Here we investigate the retention and spatio‐temporal expression dynamics of duplicated genes predicted to regulate the floral transition in Brassica napus (oilseed rape, OSR). We show that flowering time genes are preferentially retained relative to other genes in the OSR genome. Using a transcriptome time series in two tissues (leaf and shoot apex) across development we show that 67% of these retained flowering time genes are expressed. Furthermore, between 64% (leaf) and 74% (shoot apex) of the retained gene homologues show diverged expression patterns relative to each other across development, suggesting neo‐ or subfunctionalization. A case study of homologues of the shoot meristem identity gene TFL1 reveals differences in cis‐regulatory elements that could explain this divergence. Such differences in the expression dynamics of duplicated genes highlight the challenges involved in translating gene regulatory networks from diploid model systems to more complex polyploid crop species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6175450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61754502018-10-19 Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus Jones, D. Marc Wells, Rachel Pullen, Nick Trick, Martin Irwin, Judith A. Morris, Richard J. Plant J Original Articles Polyploidy is a recurrent feature of eukaryotic evolution and has been linked to increases in complexity, adaptive radiation and speciation. Within angiosperms such events have occurred repeatedly in many plant lineages. Here we investigate the retention and spatio‐temporal expression dynamics of duplicated genes predicted to regulate the floral transition in Brassica napus (oilseed rape, OSR). We show that flowering time genes are preferentially retained relative to other genes in the OSR genome. Using a transcriptome time series in two tissues (leaf and shoot apex) across development we show that 67% of these retained flowering time genes are expressed. Furthermore, between 64% (leaf) and 74% (shoot apex) of the retained gene homologues show diverged expression patterns relative to each other across development, suggesting neo‐ or subfunctionalization. A case study of homologues of the shoot meristem identity gene TFL1 reveals differences in cis‐regulatory elements that could explain this divergence. Such differences in the expression dynamics of duplicated genes highlight the challenges involved in translating gene regulatory networks from diploid model systems to more complex polyploid crop species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-24 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6175450/ /pubmed/29989238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14020 Text en © 2018 The Authors.The Plant Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Experimental Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jones, D. Marc
Wells, Rachel
Pullen, Nick
Trick, Martin
Irwin, Judith A.
Morris, Richard J.
Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus
title Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus
title_full Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus
title_fullStr Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus
title_full_unstemmed Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus
title_short Spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid Brassica napus
title_sort spatio‐temporal expression dynamics differ between homologues of flowering time genes in the allopolyploid brassica napus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29989238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14020
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdmarc spatiotemporalexpressiondynamicsdifferbetweenhomologuesoffloweringtimegenesintheallopolyploidbrassicanapus
AT wellsrachel spatiotemporalexpressiondynamicsdifferbetweenhomologuesoffloweringtimegenesintheallopolyploidbrassicanapus
AT pullennick spatiotemporalexpressiondynamicsdifferbetweenhomologuesoffloweringtimegenesintheallopolyploidbrassicanapus
AT trickmartin spatiotemporalexpressiondynamicsdifferbetweenhomologuesoffloweringtimegenesintheallopolyploidbrassicanapus
AT irwinjuditha spatiotemporalexpressiondynamicsdifferbetweenhomologuesoffloweringtimegenesintheallopolyploidbrassicanapus
AT morrisrichardj spatiotemporalexpressiondynamicsdifferbetweenhomologuesoffloweringtimegenesintheallopolyploidbrassicanapus