Cargando…

Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function

OBJECTIVE: Frontal cortical abnormalities and executive function impairment co‐occur in bipolar disorder. Recent studies have shown that bipolar subtypes differ in the degree of structural and functional impairments. The relationships between cognitive performance and cortical integrity have not bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abé, C., Rolstad, S., Petrovic, P., Ekman, C.‐J., Sparding, T., Ingvar, M., Landén, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29907968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acps.12922
_version_ 1783361516924305408
author Abé, C.
Rolstad, S.
Petrovic, P.
Ekman, C.‐J.
Sparding, T.
Ingvar, M.
Landén, M.
author_facet Abé, C.
Rolstad, S.
Petrovic, P.
Ekman, C.‐J.
Sparding, T.
Ingvar, M.
Landén, M.
author_sort Abé, C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Frontal cortical abnormalities and executive function impairment co‐occur in bipolar disorder. Recent studies have shown that bipolar subtypes differ in the degree of structural and functional impairments. The relationships between cognitive performance and cortical integrity have not been clarified and might differ across patients with bipolar disorder type I, II, and healthy subjects. METHOD: Using a vertex‐wise whole‐brain analysis, we investigated how cortical integrity, as measured by cortical thickness, correlates with executive performance in patients with bipolar disorder type I, II, and controls (N = 160). RESULTS: We found focal associations between executive function and cortical thickness in the medial prefrontal cortex in bipolar II patients and controls, but not in bipolar I disorder. In bipolar II patients, we observed additional correlations in lateral prefrontal and occipital regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that bipolar disorder patients show altered structure–function relationships, and importantly that those relationships may differ between bipolar subtypes. The findings are line with studies suggesting subtype‐specific neurobiological and cognitive profiles. This study contributes to a better understanding of brain structure–function relationships in bipolar disorder and gives important insights into the neuropathophysiology of diagnostic subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6175455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61754552018-10-19 Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function Abé, C. Rolstad, S. Petrovic, P. Ekman, C.‐J. Sparding, T. Ingvar, M. Landén, M. Acta Psychiatr Scand Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Frontal cortical abnormalities and executive function impairment co‐occur in bipolar disorder. Recent studies have shown that bipolar subtypes differ in the degree of structural and functional impairments. The relationships between cognitive performance and cortical integrity have not been clarified and might differ across patients with bipolar disorder type I, II, and healthy subjects. METHOD: Using a vertex‐wise whole‐brain analysis, we investigated how cortical integrity, as measured by cortical thickness, correlates with executive performance in patients with bipolar disorder type I, II, and controls (N = 160). RESULTS: We found focal associations between executive function and cortical thickness in the medial prefrontal cortex in bipolar II patients and controls, but not in bipolar I disorder. In bipolar II patients, we observed additional correlations in lateral prefrontal and occipital regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that bipolar disorder patients show altered structure–function relationships, and importantly that those relationships may differ between bipolar subtypes. The findings are line with studies suggesting subtype‐specific neurobiological and cognitive profiles. This study contributes to a better understanding of brain structure–function relationships in bipolar disorder and gives important insights into the neuropathophysiology of diagnostic subtypes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-15 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6175455/ /pubmed/29907968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acps.12922 Text en © 2018 The Authors Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Abé, C.
Rolstad, S.
Petrovic, P.
Ekman, C.‐J.
Sparding, T.
Ingvar, M.
Landén, M.
Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function
title Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function
title_full Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function
title_fullStr Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function
title_full_unstemmed Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function
title_short Bipolar disorder type I and II show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function
title_sort bipolar disorder type i and ii show distinct relationships between cortical thickness and executive function
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29907968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acps.12922
work_keys_str_mv AT abec bipolardisordertypeiandiishowdistinctrelationshipsbetweencorticalthicknessandexecutivefunction
AT rolstads bipolardisordertypeiandiishowdistinctrelationshipsbetweencorticalthicknessandexecutivefunction
AT petrovicp bipolardisordertypeiandiishowdistinctrelationshipsbetweencorticalthicknessandexecutivefunction
AT ekmancj bipolardisordertypeiandiishowdistinctrelationshipsbetweencorticalthicknessandexecutivefunction
AT spardingt bipolardisordertypeiandiishowdistinctrelationshipsbetweencorticalthicknessandexecutivefunction
AT ingvarm bipolardisordertypeiandiishowdistinctrelationshipsbetweencorticalthicknessandexecutivefunction
AT landenm bipolardisordertypeiandiishowdistinctrelationshipsbetweencorticalthicknessandexecutivefunction