Cargando…
The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment
PURPOSE: Although common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFAE) is regarded as the standard treatment modality for common femoral artery (CFA) disease, availability of advanced endovascular techniques has resulted in an increased number of CFA disease being treated. We evaluated clinical outcomes in a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Vascular Specialist International
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.65 |
_version_ | 1783361544607760384 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jun Hyung So, Byung Jun Byun, Seung Jae Kim, Kyung Yun |
author_facet | Kim, Jun Hyung So, Byung Jun Byun, Seung Jae Kim, Kyung Yun |
author_sort | Kim, Jun Hyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFAE) is regarded as the standard treatment modality for common femoral artery (CFA) disease, availability of advanced endovascular techniques has resulted in an increased number of CFA disease being treated. We evaluated clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of patients who were treated for CFA disease using endarterectomy alone or combined with endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients from November 2001 through December 2007. The treated lesions were divided into 4 groups based on operative procedure: group I (n=11), CFAE alone; group II (n=15), CFAE and iliac artery (IA) endovascular treatment; group III (n=6), CFAE and superficial femoral artery (SFA) endovascular treatment; group IV (n=14), CFAE and IA and SFA endovascular treatment or bypass surgery. RESULTS: The degree of CFA steno-occlusion was not different among the groups. The 3-year primary patency rates of each group were 88.9±10.5%, 60.0±14.5%, 62.5±21.3%, and 83.9±10.4%, respectively. The 3-year primary assisted patency rates were 100%, 70.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 89.3±10.4%, while 3-year secondary patency rates were 100%, 80.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 92.3±7.4%, respectively. There was no procedure-related mortality. Significant improvement of ankle-brachial index was achieved in all groups. CONCLUSION: CFAE alone is the treatment of choice for excellent patency and clinical improvement in steno-occlusive lesions confined to the CFA. In multiple steno-occlusive diseases, this procedure could be combined with endovascular procedures to reduce the operative risk in conditions with high morbidity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6175571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Vascular Specialist International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61755712018-10-11 The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment Kim, Jun Hyung So, Byung Jun Byun, Seung Jae Kim, Kyung Yun Vasc Specialist Int Original Article PURPOSE: Although common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFAE) is regarded as the standard treatment modality for common femoral artery (CFA) disease, availability of advanced endovascular techniques has resulted in an increased number of CFA disease being treated. We evaluated clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of patients who were treated for CFA disease using endarterectomy alone or combined with endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients from November 2001 through December 2007. The treated lesions were divided into 4 groups based on operative procedure: group I (n=11), CFAE alone; group II (n=15), CFAE and iliac artery (IA) endovascular treatment; group III (n=6), CFAE and superficial femoral artery (SFA) endovascular treatment; group IV (n=14), CFAE and IA and SFA endovascular treatment or bypass surgery. RESULTS: The degree of CFA steno-occlusion was not different among the groups. The 3-year primary patency rates of each group were 88.9±10.5%, 60.0±14.5%, 62.5±21.3%, and 83.9±10.4%, respectively. The 3-year primary assisted patency rates were 100%, 70.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 89.3±10.4%, while 3-year secondary patency rates were 100%, 80.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 92.3±7.4%, respectively. There was no procedure-related mortality. Significant improvement of ankle-brachial index was achieved in all groups. CONCLUSION: CFAE alone is the treatment of choice for excellent patency and clinical improvement in steno-occlusive lesions confined to the CFA. In multiple steno-occlusive diseases, this procedure could be combined with endovascular procedures to reduce the operative risk in conditions with high morbidity. Vascular Specialist International 2018-09 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6175571/ /pubmed/30310809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.65 Text en Copyright © 2018, The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Jun Hyung So, Byung Jun Byun, Seung Jae Kim, Kyung Yun The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment |
title | The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment |
title_full | The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment |
title_fullStr | The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment |
title_short | The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment |
title_sort | advantage of common femoral endarterectomy alone or combined with endovascular treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjunhyung theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment AT sobyungjun theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment AT byunseungjae theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment AT kimkyungyun theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment AT kimjunhyung advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment AT sobyungjun advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment AT byunseungjae advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment AT kimkyungyun advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment |