Cargando…

The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment

PURPOSE: Although common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFAE) is regarded as the standard treatment modality for common femoral artery (CFA) disease, availability of advanced endovascular techniques has resulted in an increased number of CFA disease being treated. We evaluated clinical outcomes in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jun Hyung, So, Byung Jun, Byun, Seung Jae, Kim, Kyung Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Vascular Specialist International 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310809
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.65
_version_ 1783361544607760384
author Kim, Jun Hyung
So, Byung Jun
Byun, Seung Jae
Kim, Kyung Yun
author_facet Kim, Jun Hyung
So, Byung Jun
Byun, Seung Jae
Kim, Kyung Yun
author_sort Kim, Jun Hyung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFAE) is regarded as the standard treatment modality for common femoral artery (CFA) disease, availability of advanced endovascular techniques has resulted in an increased number of CFA disease being treated. We evaluated clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of patients who were treated for CFA disease using endarterectomy alone or combined with endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients from November 2001 through December 2007. The treated lesions were divided into 4 groups based on operative procedure: group I (n=11), CFAE alone; group II (n=15), CFAE and iliac artery (IA) endovascular treatment; group III (n=6), CFAE and superficial femoral artery (SFA) endovascular treatment; group IV (n=14), CFAE and IA and SFA endovascular treatment or bypass surgery. RESULTS: The degree of CFA steno-occlusion was not different among the groups. The 3-year primary patency rates of each group were 88.9±10.5%, 60.0±14.5%, 62.5±21.3%, and 83.9±10.4%, respectively. The 3-year primary assisted patency rates were 100%, 70.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 89.3±10.4%, while 3-year secondary patency rates were 100%, 80.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 92.3±7.4%, respectively. There was no procedure-related mortality. Significant improvement of ankle-brachial index was achieved in all groups. CONCLUSION: CFAE alone is the treatment of choice for excellent patency and clinical improvement in steno-occlusive lesions confined to the CFA. In multiple steno-occlusive diseases, this procedure could be combined with endovascular procedures to reduce the operative risk in conditions with high morbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6175571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Vascular Specialist International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61755712018-10-11 The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment Kim, Jun Hyung So, Byung Jun Byun, Seung Jae Kim, Kyung Yun Vasc Specialist Int Original Article PURPOSE: Although common femoral artery endarterectomy (CFAE) is regarded as the standard treatment modality for common femoral artery (CFA) disease, availability of advanced endovascular techniques has resulted in an increased number of CFA disease being treated. We evaluated clinical outcomes in a contemporary series of patients who were treated for CFA disease using endarterectomy alone or combined with endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients from November 2001 through December 2007. The treated lesions were divided into 4 groups based on operative procedure: group I (n=11), CFAE alone; group II (n=15), CFAE and iliac artery (IA) endovascular treatment; group III (n=6), CFAE and superficial femoral artery (SFA) endovascular treatment; group IV (n=14), CFAE and IA and SFA endovascular treatment or bypass surgery. RESULTS: The degree of CFA steno-occlusion was not different among the groups. The 3-year primary patency rates of each group were 88.9±10.5%, 60.0±14.5%, 62.5±21.3%, and 83.9±10.4%, respectively. The 3-year primary assisted patency rates were 100%, 70.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 89.3±10.4%, while 3-year secondary patency rates were 100%, 80.0±13.0%, 62.5±21.3%, and 92.3±7.4%, respectively. There was no procedure-related mortality. Significant improvement of ankle-brachial index was achieved in all groups. CONCLUSION: CFAE alone is the treatment of choice for excellent patency and clinical improvement in steno-occlusive lesions confined to the CFA. In multiple steno-occlusive diseases, this procedure could be combined with endovascular procedures to reduce the operative risk in conditions with high morbidity. Vascular Specialist International 2018-09 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6175571/ /pubmed/30310809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.65 Text en Copyright © 2018, The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jun Hyung
So, Byung Jun
Byun, Seung Jae
Kim, Kyung Yun
The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment
title The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment
title_full The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment
title_fullStr The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment
title_full_unstemmed The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment
title_short The Advantage of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone or Combined with Endovascular Treatment
title_sort advantage of common femoral endarterectomy alone or combined with endovascular treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310809
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.65
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjunhyung theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment
AT sobyungjun theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment
AT byunseungjae theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment
AT kimkyungyun theadvantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment
AT kimjunhyung advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment
AT sobyungjun advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment
AT byunseungjae advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment
AT kimkyungyun advantageofcommonfemoralendarterectomyaloneorcombinedwithendovasculartreatment