Cargando…
Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
Background and study aims Traversing the ileocecal valve (ICV) is technically challenging with a retrograde approach to single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). A novel technique called responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscopy was developed to obtain a higher cecal intubation rate in this setting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4168 |
_version_ | 1783361549630439424 |
---|---|
author | Hosoe, Naoki Ohtsuka, Kazuo Endo, Yutaka Naganuma, Makoto Ogata, Noriyuki Kuroki, Yuichiro Sasanuma, Seiko Takabayashi, Kaoru Kudo, Shin-Ei Takahashi, Hiroshi Ogata, Haruhiko Kanai, Takanori |
author_facet | Hosoe, Naoki Ohtsuka, Kazuo Endo, Yutaka Naganuma, Makoto Ogata, Noriyuki Kuroki, Yuichiro Sasanuma, Seiko Takabayashi, Kaoru Kudo, Shin-Ei Takahashi, Hiroshi Ogata, Haruhiko Kanai, Takanori |
author_sort | Hosoe, Naoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Traversing the ileocecal valve (ICV) is technically challenging with a retrograde approach to single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). A novel technique called responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscopy was developed to obtain a higher cecal intubation rate in this setting. A prototype long SBE equipped with RIT (P-SBE) was developed to obtain superior insertability. The aim of this study was to compare the insertability of a standard single-balloon enteroscope (S-SBE) versus a P-SBE. Patients and methods This study was a multicenter, randomized, non-blinded, trial of 62 patients with small bowel pathologies. All procedures were performed with SBE via the trans-anal route. Procedure success was defined as stable intubation of the terminal ileum (TI) 20 cm beyond the ICV. The primary variable was time to reach stable TI intubation 20 cm beyond the ICV (TSTII). If stable TI intubation was not achieved within 10 minutes, the initial SBE was removed through the indwelling overtube and replaced with another SBE. Results Sixty patients were examined with two patients excluded from this study. TSTII using P-SBE was significantly decreased compared to S-SBE (mean P-SBE vs S-SBE: 98.3 vs 169.4 second, P = 0.006). The completion rates for stable intubation within 10 minutes of using P-SBE and S-SBE were 96.8 % and 86.2 %, respectively ( P = 0.19). On endoscope replacement, all patients had achieved stable TI intubation. Conclusions SBE with RIT improves insertability when traversing the ileocecal valve in retrograde SBE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6175682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61756822018-10-09 Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial Hosoe, Naoki Ohtsuka, Kazuo Endo, Yutaka Naganuma, Makoto Ogata, Noriyuki Kuroki, Yuichiro Sasanuma, Seiko Takabayashi, Kaoru Kudo, Shin-Ei Takahashi, Hiroshi Ogata, Haruhiko Kanai, Takanori Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Traversing the ileocecal valve (ICV) is technically challenging with a retrograde approach to single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). A novel technique called responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscopy was developed to obtain a higher cecal intubation rate in this setting. A prototype long SBE equipped with RIT (P-SBE) was developed to obtain superior insertability. The aim of this study was to compare the insertability of a standard single-balloon enteroscope (S-SBE) versus a P-SBE. Patients and methods This study was a multicenter, randomized, non-blinded, trial of 62 patients with small bowel pathologies. All procedures were performed with SBE via the trans-anal route. Procedure success was defined as stable intubation of the terminal ileum (TI) 20 cm beyond the ICV. The primary variable was time to reach stable TI intubation 20 cm beyond the ICV (TSTII). If stable TI intubation was not achieved within 10 minutes, the initial SBE was removed through the indwelling overtube and replaced with another SBE. Results Sixty patients were examined with two patients excluded from this study. TSTII using P-SBE was significantly decreased compared to S-SBE (mean P-SBE vs S-SBE: 98.3 vs 169.4 second, P = 0.006). The completion rates for stable intubation within 10 minutes of using P-SBE and S-SBE were 96.8 % and 86.2 %, respectively ( P = 0.19). On endoscope replacement, all patients had achieved stable TI intubation. Conclusions SBE with RIT improves insertability when traversing the ileocecal valve in retrograde SBE. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-10 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6175682/ /pubmed/30302375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4168 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Hosoe, Naoki Ohtsuka, Kazuo Endo, Yutaka Naganuma, Makoto Ogata, Noriyuki Kuroki, Yuichiro Sasanuma, Seiko Takabayashi, Kaoru Kudo, Shin-Ei Takahashi, Hiroshi Ogata, Haruhiko Kanai, Takanori Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial |
title | Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial |
title_full | Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial |
title_fullStr | Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial |
title_short | Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial |
title_sort | insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hosoenaoki insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT ohtsukakazuo insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT endoyutaka insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT naganumamakoto insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT ogatanoriyuki insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT kurokiyuichiro insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT sasanumaseiko insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT takabayashikaoru insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT kudoshinei insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT takahashihiroshi insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT ogataharuhiko insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial AT kanaitakanori insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial |