Cargando…

Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial

Background and study aims  Traversing the ileocecal valve (ICV) is technically challenging with a retrograde approach to single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). A novel technique called responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscopy was developed to obtain a higher cecal intubation rate in this setting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosoe, Naoki, Ohtsuka, Kazuo, Endo, Yutaka, Naganuma, Makoto, Ogata, Noriyuki, Kuroki, Yuichiro, Sasanuma, Seiko, Takabayashi, Kaoru, Kudo, Shin-Ei, Takahashi, Hiroshi, Ogata, Haruhiko, Kanai, Takanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4168
_version_ 1783361549630439424
author Hosoe, Naoki
Ohtsuka, Kazuo
Endo, Yutaka
Naganuma, Makoto
Ogata, Noriyuki
Kuroki, Yuichiro
Sasanuma, Seiko
Takabayashi, Kaoru
Kudo, Shin-Ei
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Ogata, Haruhiko
Kanai, Takanori
author_facet Hosoe, Naoki
Ohtsuka, Kazuo
Endo, Yutaka
Naganuma, Makoto
Ogata, Noriyuki
Kuroki, Yuichiro
Sasanuma, Seiko
Takabayashi, Kaoru
Kudo, Shin-Ei
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Ogata, Haruhiko
Kanai, Takanori
author_sort Hosoe, Naoki
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Traversing the ileocecal valve (ICV) is technically challenging with a retrograde approach to single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). A novel technique called responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscopy was developed to obtain a higher cecal intubation rate in this setting. A prototype long SBE equipped with RIT (P-SBE) was developed to obtain superior insertability. The aim of this study was to compare the insertability of a standard single-balloon enteroscope (S-SBE) versus a P-SBE. Patients and methods  This study was a multicenter, randomized, non-blinded, trial of 62 patients with small bowel pathologies. All procedures were performed with SBE via the trans-anal route. Procedure success was defined as stable intubation of the terminal ileum (TI) 20 cm beyond the ICV. The primary variable was time to reach stable TI intubation 20 cm beyond the ICV (TSTII). If stable TI intubation was not achieved within 10 minutes, the initial SBE was removed through the indwelling overtube and replaced with another SBE. Results  Sixty patients were examined with two patients excluded from this study. TSTII using P-SBE was significantly decreased compared to S-SBE (mean P-SBE vs S-SBE: 98.3 vs 169.4 second, P  = 0.006). The completion rates for stable intubation within 10 minutes of using P-SBE and S-SBE were 96.8 % and 86.2 %, respectively ( P  = 0.19). On endoscope replacement, all patients had achieved stable TI intubation. Conclusions  SBE with RIT improves insertability when traversing the ileocecal valve in retrograde SBE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6175682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61756822018-10-09 Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial Hosoe, Naoki Ohtsuka, Kazuo Endo, Yutaka Naganuma, Makoto Ogata, Noriyuki Kuroki, Yuichiro Sasanuma, Seiko Takabayashi, Kaoru Kudo, Shin-Ei Takahashi, Hiroshi Ogata, Haruhiko Kanai, Takanori Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Traversing the ileocecal valve (ICV) is technically challenging with a retrograde approach to single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE). A novel technique called responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscopy was developed to obtain a higher cecal intubation rate in this setting. A prototype long SBE equipped with RIT (P-SBE) was developed to obtain superior insertability. The aim of this study was to compare the insertability of a standard single-balloon enteroscope (S-SBE) versus a P-SBE. Patients and methods  This study was a multicenter, randomized, non-blinded, trial of 62 patients with small bowel pathologies. All procedures were performed with SBE via the trans-anal route. Procedure success was defined as stable intubation of the terminal ileum (TI) 20 cm beyond the ICV. The primary variable was time to reach stable TI intubation 20 cm beyond the ICV (TSTII). If stable TI intubation was not achieved within 10 minutes, the initial SBE was removed through the indwelling overtube and replaced with another SBE. Results  Sixty patients were examined with two patients excluded from this study. TSTII using P-SBE was significantly decreased compared to S-SBE (mean P-SBE vs S-SBE: 98.3 vs 169.4 second, P  = 0.006). The completion rates for stable intubation within 10 minutes of using P-SBE and S-SBE were 96.8 % and 86.2 %, respectively ( P  = 0.19). On endoscope replacement, all patients had achieved stable TI intubation. Conclusions  SBE with RIT improves insertability when traversing the ileocecal valve in retrograde SBE. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-10 2018-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6175682/ /pubmed/30302375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4168 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hosoe, Naoki
Ohtsuka, Kazuo
Endo, Yutaka
Naganuma, Makoto
Ogata, Noriyuki
Kuroki, Yuichiro
Sasanuma, Seiko
Takabayashi, Kaoru
Kudo, Shin-Ei
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Ogata, Haruhiko
Kanai, Takanori
Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
title Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
title_full Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
title_fullStr Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
title_full_unstemmed Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
title_short Insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
title_sort insertability comparison of passive bending single-balloon prototype versus standard single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized non-blinded trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4168
work_keys_str_mv AT hosoenaoki insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT ohtsukakazuo insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT endoyutaka insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT naganumamakoto insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT ogatanoriyuki insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT kurokiyuichiro insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT sasanumaseiko insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT takabayashikaoru insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT kudoshinei insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT takahashihiroshi insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT ogataharuhiko insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial
AT kanaitakanori insertabilitycomparisonofpassivebendingsingleballoonprototypeversusstandardsingleballoonenteroscopyamulticenterrandomizednonblindedtrial