Cargando…

Stable and discriminating features are predictive of cancer presence and Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-site study

Site variation in fixation, staining, and scanning can confound automated tissue based image classifiers for disease characterization. In this study we incorporated stability into four feature selection methods for identifying the most robust and discriminating features for two prostate histopatholo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Leo, Patrick, Elliott, Robin, Shih, Natalie N. C., Gupta, Sanjay, Feldman, Michael, Madabhushi, Anant
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33026-5

Ejemplares similares

Cascaded discrimination of normal, abnormal, and confounder classes in histopathology: Gleason grading of prostate cancer
por: Doyle, Scott, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
por: Renshaw, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Higher Prostate Weight Is Inversely Associated with Gleason Score Upgrading in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
por: Reis, Leonardo Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Identifying the morphologic basis for radiomic features in distinguishing different Gleason grades of prostate cancer on MRI: Preliminary findings
por: Penzias, Gregory, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Association of Fatty Acid Levels and Gleason Grade among Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Zhao, Zhiguo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience
por: Nayyar, Rishi, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The prevalence and risk factors of upgrading of Gleason grade group between transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
por: Promsen, Worapong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Leng, Yi-Hsueh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Increased fatty acid synthase expression in prostate biopsy cores predicts higher Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen
por: Hamada, Shinsuke, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Kim, Hwanik, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
por: Milonas, Daimantas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Erratum: Increased fatty acid synthase expression in prostate biopsy cores predicts higher Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen
por: Hamada, Shinsuke, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
por: Geybels, Milan S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Histopathological Ratios to Predict Gleason Score Agreement between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy
por: Fiorentino, Vincenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Importance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictive factor for concordance between the Gleason scores of prostate biopsies and RADICAL prostatectomy specimens
por: de Lima, Nelson Gianni, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry – Victoria
por: Evans, Sue M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
por: Li, Jiakun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Ability of Prostate Health Index (PHI) to Predict Gleason Score in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Discriminate Patients Between Gleason Score 6 and Gleason Score Higher Than 6—A Study on 320 Patients After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Dolejsova, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Faraj, Sheila F., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
por: Liu, Hailang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Predictors of Grade Group Upgrading for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Compared to Those of Preoperative Needle Biopsy Specimens
por: Tomioka, Masayuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
por: Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Long-Term Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients with Pathologic Gleason 8–10 Disease
por: Lewinshtein, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
por: Zhang, Baoling, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prediction model of gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy based on a bayesian network
por: Wang, Guipeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy
por: Flammia, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

From Cognitive MR-Targeted Fusion Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictors of Gleason Grade Group Upgrading in a Chinese Cohort
por: Yan, Huaqing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Predictive Factors and Oncologic Outcome of Downgrade to Pathologic Gleason Score 6–7 after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 8–10
por: Chung, Doo Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Gene expression signature of Gleason score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in a radical prostatectomy cohort
por: Jhun, Min A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
por: Ikeda, Masaomi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Outcomes following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation for veterans with Gleason 9 and 10 prostate cancer
por: Chao, Hann‐Hsiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
por: Zelic, Renata, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Rührup, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch
por: Bai, W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score
por: Hu, Xin-Hai, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_cu3j0ra8lhnvb1a3npvd6nvr5e