Cargando…
Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha
OBJECTIVE: To measure the audiological benefit of the Baha SoundArc, a recently introduced nonimplantable wearing option for bone conduction sound processor, and to compare it with the known softband wearing option in subjects with normal cochlear function and a purely conductive bilateral hearing l...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5264124 |
_version_ | 1783361672700755968 |
---|---|
author | Gawliczek, Tom Wimmer, Wilhelm Munzinger, Fabio Caversaccio, Marco Kompis, Martin |
author_facet | Gawliczek, Tom Wimmer, Wilhelm Munzinger, Fabio Caversaccio, Marco Kompis, Martin |
author_sort | Gawliczek, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To measure the audiological benefit of the Baha SoundArc, a recently introduced nonimplantable wearing option for bone conduction sound processor, and to compare it with the known softband wearing option in subjects with normal cochlear function and a purely conductive bilateral hearing loss. METHODS: Both ears of 15 normal hearing subjects were occluded for the time of the measurement, yielding an average unaided threshold of 49 dB HL (0.5 – 4 kHz). Soundfield thresholds, speech understanding in quiet and in noise, and sound localization were measured in unaided conditions and with 1 or 2 Baha 5 sound processors mounted on either a softband or a SoundArc device. RESULTS: Soundfield thresholds and speech reception thresholds were improved by 19.5 to 24.8 dB (p<.001), when compared to the unaided condition. Speech reception thresholds in noise were improved by 3.7 to 4.7 dB (p<.001). Using 2 sound processors rather than one improved speech understanding in noise for speech from the direction of the 2(nd) device and sound localization error by 23° to 28°. No statistically significant difference was found between the SoundArc and the softband wearing options in any of the tests. CONCLUSIONS: Bone conduction sound processor mounted on a SoundArc or on a softband resulted in considerable improvements in hearing and speech understanding in subjects with a simulated, purely conductive, and bilateral hearing loss. No significant difference between the 2 wearing options was found. Using 2 sound processors improves sound localization and speech understanding in noise in certain spatial settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6176295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61762952018-10-23 Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha Gawliczek, Tom Wimmer, Wilhelm Munzinger, Fabio Caversaccio, Marco Kompis, Martin Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVE: To measure the audiological benefit of the Baha SoundArc, a recently introduced nonimplantable wearing option for bone conduction sound processor, and to compare it with the known softband wearing option in subjects with normal cochlear function and a purely conductive bilateral hearing loss. METHODS: Both ears of 15 normal hearing subjects were occluded for the time of the measurement, yielding an average unaided threshold of 49 dB HL (0.5 – 4 kHz). Soundfield thresholds, speech understanding in quiet and in noise, and sound localization were measured in unaided conditions and with 1 or 2 Baha 5 sound processors mounted on either a softband or a SoundArc device. RESULTS: Soundfield thresholds and speech reception thresholds were improved by 19.5 to 24.8 dB (p<.001), when compared to the unaided condition. Speech reception thresholds in noise were improved by 3.7 to 4.7 dB (p<.001). Using 2 sound processors rather than one improved speech understanding in noise for speech from the direction of the 2(nd) device and sound localization error by 23° to 28°. No statistically significant difference was found between the SoundArc and the softband wearing options in any of the tests. CONCLUSIONS: Bone conduction sound processor mounted on a SoundArc or on a softband resulted in considerable improvements in hearing and speech understanding in subjects with a simulated, purely conductive, and bilateral hearing loss. No significant difference between the 2 wearing options was found. Using 2 sound processors improves sound localization and speech understanding in noise in certain spatial settings. Hindawi 2018-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6176295/ /pubmed/30356363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5264124 Text en Copyright © 2018 Tom Gawliczek et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gawliczek, Tom Wimmer, Wilhelm Munzinger, Fabio Caversaccio, Marco Kompis, Martin Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha |
title | Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha |
title_full | Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha |
title_fullStr | Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha |
title_full_unstemmed | Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha |
title_short | Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha |
title_sort | speech understanding and sound localization with a new nonimplantable wearing option for baha |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30356363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5264124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gawliczektom speechunderstandingandsoundlocalizationwithanewnonimplantablewearingoptionforbaha AT wimmerwilhelm speechunderstandingandsoundlocalizationwithanewnonimplantablewearingoptionforbaha AT munzingerfabio speechunderstandingandsoundlocalizationwithanewnonimplantablewearingoptionforbaha AT caversacciomarco speechunderstandingandsoundlocalizationwithanewnonimplantablewearingoptionforbaha AT kompismartin speechunderstandingandsoundlocalizationwithanewnonimplantablewearingoptionforbaha |