Cargando…

A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success rate of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for complete resection of 4–9 mm colorectal adenomatous polyps compared with that of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). DESIGN: A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted in 12 Japa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawamura, Takuji, Takeuchi, Yoji, Asai, Satoshi, Yokota, Isao, Akamine, Eisuke, Kato, Minoru, Akamatsu, Takuji, Tada, Kazuhiro, Komeda, Yoriaki, Iwatate, Mineo, Kawakami, Ken, Nishikawa, Michiko, Watanabe, Daisuke, Yamauchi, Atsushi, Fukata, Norimasa, Shimatani, Masaaki, Ooi, Makoto, Fujita, Koichi, Sano, Yasushi, Kashida, Hiroshi, Hirose, Satoru, Iwagami, Hiroyoshi, Uedo, Noriya, Teramukai, Satoshi, Tanaka, Kiyohito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215
_version_ 1783361719416913920
author Kawamura, Takuji
Takeuchi, Yoji
Asai, Satoshi
Yokota, Isao
Akamine, Eisuke
Kato, Minoru
Akamatsu, Takuji
Tada, Kazuhiro
Komeda, Yoriaki
Iwatate, Mineo
Kawakami, Ken
Nishikawa, Michiko
Watanabe, Daisuke
Yamauchi, Atsushi
Fukata, Norimasa
Shimatani, Masaaki
Ooi, Makoto
Fujita, Koichi
Sano, Yasushi
Kashida, Hiroshi
Hirose, Satoru
Iwagami, Hiroyoshi
Uedo, Noriya
Teramukai, Satoshi
Tanaka, Kiyohito
author_facet Kawamura, Takuji
Takeuchi, Yoji
Asai, Satoshi
Yokota, Isao
Akamine, Eisuke
Kato, Minoru
Akamatsu, Takuji
Tada, Kazuhiro
Komeda, Yoriaki
Iwatate, Mineo
Kawakami, Ken
Nishikawa, Michiko
Watanabe, Daisuke
Yamauchi, Atsushi
Fukata, Norimasa
Shimatani, Masaaki
Ooi, Makoto
Fujita, Koichi
Sano, Yasushi
Kashida, Hiroshi
Hirose, Satoru
Iwagami, Hiroyoshi
Uedo, Noriya
Teramukai, Satoshi
Tanaka, Kiyohito
author_sort Kawamura, Takuji
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success rate of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for complete resection of 4–9 mm colorectal adenomatous polyps compared with that of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). DESIGN: A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted in 12 Japanese endoscopy units. Endoscopically diagnosed sessile adenomatous polyps, 4–9 mm in size, were randomly assigned to the CSP or HSP group. After complete removal of the polyp using the allocated technique, biopsy specimens from the resection margin after polypectomy were obtained. The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, defined as no evidence of adenomatous tissue in the biopsied specimens, among all pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyps. RESULTS: A total of 796 eligible polyps were detected in 538 of 912 patients screened for eligibility between September 2015 and August 2016. The complete resection rate for CSP was 98.2% compared with 97.4% for HSP. The non-inferiority of CSP for complete resection compared with HSP was confirmed by the +0.8% (90% CI −1.0 to 2.7) complete resection rate (non-inferiority p<0.0001). Postoperative bleeding requiring endoscopic haemostasis occurred only in the HSP group (0.5%, 2 of 402 polyps). CONCLUSIONS: The complete resection rate for CSP is not inferior to that for HSP. CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps. (Study registration: UMIN000018328)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6176523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61765232018-10-11 A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) Kawamura, Takuji Takeuchi, Yoji Asai, Satoshi Yokota, Isao Akamine, Eisuke Kato, Minoru Akamatsu, Takuji Tada, Kazuhiro Komeda, Yoriaki Iwatate, Mineo Kawakami, Ken Nishikawa, Michiko Watanabe, Daisuke Yamauchi, Atsushi Fukata, Norimasa Shimatani, Masaaki Ooi, Makoto Fujita, Koichi Sano, Yasushi Kashida, Hiroshi Hirose, Satoru Iwagami, Hiroyoshi Uedo, Noriya Teramukai, Satoshi Tanaka, Kiyohito Gut Endoscopy OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success rate of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for complete resection of 4–9 mm colorectal adenomatous polyps compared with that of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). DESIGN: A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted in 12 Japanese endoscopy units. Endoscopically diagnosed sessile adenomatous polyps, 4–9 mm in size, were randomly assigned to the CSP or HSP group. After complete removal of the polyp using the allocated technique, biopsy specimens from the resection margin after polypectomy were obtained. The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, defined as no evidence of adenomatous tissue in the biopsied specimens, among all pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyps. RESULTS: A total of 796 eligible polyps were detected in 538 of 912 patients screened for eligibility between September 2015 and August 2016. The complete resection rate for CSP was 98.2% compared with 97.4% for HSP. The non-inferiority of CSP for complete resection compared with HSP was confirmed by the +0.8% (90% CI −1.0 to 2.7) complete resection rate (non-inferiority p<0.0001). Postoperative bleeding requiring endoscopic haemostasis occurred only in the HSP group (0.5%, 2 of 402 polyps). CONCLUSIONS: The complete resection rate for CSP is not inferior to that for HSP. CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps. (Study registration: UMIN000018328) BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11 2017-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6176523/ /pubmed/28970290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Endoscopy
Kawamura, Takuji
Takeuchi, Yoji
Asai, Satoshi
Yokota, Isao
Akamine, Eisuke
Kato, Minoru
Akamatsu, Takuji
Tada, Kazuhiro
Komeda, Yoriaki
Iwatate, Mineo
Kawakami, Ken
Nishikawa, Michiko
Watanabe, Daisuke
Yamauchi, Atsushi
Fukata, Norimasa
Shimatani, Masaaki
Ooi, Makoto
Fujita, Koichi
Sano, Yasushi
Kashida, Hiroshi
Hirose, Satoru
Iwagami, Hiroyoshi
Uedo, Noriya
Teramukai, Satoshi
Tanaka, Kiyohito
A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
title A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
title_full A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
title_fullStr A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
title_short A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
title_sort comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (crescent study)
topic Endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215
work_keys_str_mv AT kawamuratakuji acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT takeuchiyoji acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT asaisatoshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT yokotaisao acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT akamineeisuke acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT katominoru acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT akamatsutakuji acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT tadakazuhiro acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT komedayoriaki acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT iwatatemineo acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT kawakamiken acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT nishikawamichiko acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT watanabedaisuke acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT yamauchiatsushi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT fukatanorimasa acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT shimatanimasaaki acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT ooimakoto acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT fujitakoichi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT sanoyasushi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT kashidahiroshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT hirosesatoru acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT iwagamihiroyoshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT uedonoriya acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT teramukaisatoshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT tanakakiyohito acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT kawamuratakuji comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT takeuchiyoji comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT asaisatoshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT yokotaisao comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT akamineeisuke comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT katominoru comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT akamatsutakuji comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT tadakazuhiro comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT komedayoriaki comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT iwatatemineo comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT kawakamiken comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT nishikawamichiko comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT watanabedaisuke comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT yamauchiatsushi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT fukatanorimasa comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT shimatanimasaaki comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT ooimakoto comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT fujitakoichi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT sanoyasushi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT kashidahiroshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT hirosesatoru comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT iwagamihiroyoshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT uedonoriya comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT teramukaisatoshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy
AT tanakakiyohito comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy