Cargando…
A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success rate of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for complete resection of 4–9 mm colorectal adenomatous polyps compared with that of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). DESIGN: A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted in 12 Japa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215 |
_version_ | 1783361719416913920 |
---|---|
author | Kawamura, Takuji Takeuchi, Yoji Asai, Satoshi Yokota, Isao Akamine, Eisuke Kato, Minoru Akamatsu, Takuji Tada, Kazuhiro Komeda, Yoriaki Iwatate, Mineo Kawakami, Ken Nishikawa, Michiko Watanabe, Daisuke Yamauchi, Atsushi Fukata, Norimasa Shimatani, Masaaki Ooi, Makoto Fujita, Koichi Sano, Yasushi Kashida, Hiroshi Hirose, Satoru Iwagami, Hiroyoshi Uedo, Noriya Teramukai, Satoshi Tanaka, Kiyohito |
author_facet | Kawamura, Takuji Takeuchi, Yoji Asai, Satoshi Yokota, Isao Akamine, Eisuke Kato, Minoru Akamatsu, Takuji Tada, Kazuhiro Komeda, Yoriaki Iwatate, Mineo Kawakami, Ken Nishikawa, Michiko Watanabe, Daisuke Yamauchi, Atsushi Fukata, Norimasa Shimatani, Masaaki Ooi, Makoto Fujita, Koichi Sano, Yasushi Kashida, Hiroshi Hirose, Satoru Iwagami, Hiroyoshi Uedo, Noriya Teramukai, Satoshi Tanaka, Kiyohito |
author_sort | Kawamura, Takuji |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success rate of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for complete resection of 4–9 mm colorectal adenomatous polyps compared with that of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). DESIGN: A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted in 12 Japanese endoscopy units. Endoscopically diagnosed sessile adenomatous polyps, 4–9 mm in size, were randomly assigned to the CSP or HSP group. After complete removal of the polyp using the allocated technique, biopsy specimens from the resection margin after polypectomy were obtained. The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, defined as no evidence of adenomatous tissue in the biopsied specimens, among all pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyps. RESULTS: A total of 796 eligible polyps were detected in 538 of 912 patients screened for eligibility between September 2015 and August 2016. The complete resection rate for CSP was 98.2% compared with 97.4% for HSP. The non-inferiority of CSP for complete resection compared with HSP was confirmed by the +0.8% (90% CI −1.0 to 2.7) complete resection rate (non-inferiority p<0.0001). Postoperative bleeding requiring endoscopic haemostasis occurred only in the HSP group (0.5%, 2 of 402 polyps). CONCLUSIONS: The complete resection rate for CSP is not inferior to that for HSP. CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps. (Study registration: UMIN000018328) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6176523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61765232018-10-11 A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) Kawamura, Takuji Takeuchi, Yoji Asai, Satoshi Yokota, Isao Akamine, Eisuke Kato, Minoru Akamatsu, Takuji Tada, Kazuhiro Komeda, Yoriaki Iwatate, Mineo Kawakami, Ken Nishikawa, Michiko Watanabe, Daisuke Yamauchi, Atsushi Fukata, Norimasa Shimatani, Masaaki Ooi, Makoto Fujita, Koichi Sano, Yasushi Kashida, Hiroshi Hirose, Satoru Iwagami, Hiroyoshi Uedo, Noriya Teramukai, Satoshi Tanaka, Kiyohito Gut Endoscopy OBJECTIVE: To investigate the success rate of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for complete resection of 4–9 mm colorectal adenomatous polyps compared with that of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). DESIGN: A prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled, parallel, non-inferiority trial conducted in 12 Japanese endoscopy units. Endoscopically diagnosed sessile adenomatous polyps, 4–9 mm in size, were randomly assigned to the CSP or HSP group. After complete removal of the polyp using the allocated technique, biopsy specimens from the resection margin after polypectomy were obtained. The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, defined as no evidence of adenomatous tissue in the biopsied specimens, among all pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyps. RESULTS: A total of 796 eligible polyps were detected in 538 of 912 patients screened for eligibility between September 2015 and August 2016. The complete resection rate for CSP was 98.2% compared with 97.4% for HSP. The non-inferiority of CSP for complete resection compared with HSP was confirmed by the +0.8% (90% CI −1.0 to 2.7) complete resection rate (non-inferiority p<0.0001). Postoperative bleeding requiring endoscopic haemostasis occurred only in the HSP group (0.5%, 2 of 402 polyps). CONCLUSIONS: The complete resection rate for CSP is not inferior to that for HSP. CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps. (Study registration: UMIN000018328) BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11 2017-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6176523/ /pubmed/28970290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Endoscopy Kawamura, Takuji Takeuchi, Yoji Asai, Satoshi Yokota, Isao Akamine, Eisuke Kato, Minoru Akamatsu, Takuji Tada, Kazuhiro Komeda, Yoriaki Iwatate, Mineo Kawakami, Ken Nishikawa, Michiko Watanabe, Daisuke Yamauchi, Atsushi Fukata, Norimasa Shimatani, Masaaki Ooi, Makoto Fujita, Koichi Sano, Yasushi Kashida, Hiroshi Hirose, Satoru Iwagami, Hiroyoshi Uedo, Noriya Teramukai, Satoshi Tanaka, Kiyohito A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) |
title | A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) |
title_full | A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) |
title_short | A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study) |
title_sort | comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (crescent study) |
topic | Endoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawamuratakuji acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT takeuchiyoji acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT asaisatoshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT yokotaisao acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT akamineeisuke acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT katominoru acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT akamatsutakuji acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT tadakazuhiro acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT komedayoriaki acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT iwatatemineo acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT kawakamiken acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT nishikawamichiko acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT watanabedaisuke acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT yamauchiatsushi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT fukatanorimasa acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT shimatanimasaaki acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT ooimakoto acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT fujitakoichi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT sanoyasushi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT kashidahiroshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT hirosesatoru acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT iwagamihiroyoshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT uedonoriya acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT teramukaisatoshi acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT tanakakiyohito acomparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT kawamuratakuji comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT takeuchiyoji comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT asaisatoshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT yokotaisao comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT akamineeisuke comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT katominoru comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT akamatsutakuji comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT tadakazuhiro comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT komedayoriaki comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT iwatatemineo comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT kawakamiken comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT nishikawamichiko comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT watanabedaisuke comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT yamauchiatsushi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT fukatanorimasa comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT shimatanimasaaki comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT ooimakoto comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT fujitakoichi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT sanoyasushi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT kashidahiroshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT hirosesatoru comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT iwagamihiroyoshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT uedonoriya comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT teramukaisatoshi comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy AT tanakakiyohito comparisonoftheresectionrateforcoldandhotsnarepolypectomyfor49mmcolorectalpolypsamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcrescentstudy |