Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices
The primary focus of the pharmacovigilance (PV) practice has been on the collection, assessment, and reporting of the adverse drug reactions to medicinal products. Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry has prompted efforts to toward harmonization of PV practices worldwide to enable improved k...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319947 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_89_17 |
_version_ | 1783361741816594432 |
---|---|
author | Hans, Mohit Gupta, Suresh Kumar |
author_facet | Hans, Mohit Gupta, Suresh Kumar |
author_sort | Hans, Mohit |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary focus of the pharmacovigilance (PV) practice has been on the collection, assessment, and reporting of the adverse drug reactions to medicinal products. Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry has prompted efforts to toward harmonization of PV practices worldwide to enable improved knowledge of medicine's benefit-risk profile and risk communication. Even as PV has evolved over the past decade, there still exist few areas of discordance across global PV practices. This article compares the PV legislation in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and India with a view to understand areas of harmony in the current legislation across regions and further compare health authorities' requirements with recommendations made by international organizations. Identification of potential areas of disharmony would pave the way to design solutions and strategies toward creation of a comprehensive PV system, which can be easily implemented across the globe, thus promoting the safer use of medicines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6176689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61766892018-10-12 Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices Hans, Mohit Gupta, Suresh Kumar Perspect Clin Res Review Article The primary focus of the pharmacovigilance (PV) practice has been on the collection, assessment, and reporting of the adverse drug reactions to medicinal products. Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry has prompted efforts to toward harmonization of PV practices worldwide to enable improved knowledge of medicine's benefit-risk profile and risk communication. Even as PV has evolved over the past decade, there still exist few areas of discordance across global PV practices. This article compares the PV legislation in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and India with a view to understand areas of harmony in the current legislation across regions and further compare health authorities' requirements with recommendations made by international organizations. Identification of potential areas of disharmony would pave the way to design solutions and strategies toward creation of a comprehensive PV system, which can be easily implemented across the globe, thus promoting the safer use of medicines. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6176689/ /pubmed/30319947 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_89_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Perspectives in Clinical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hans, Mohit Gupta, Suresh Kumar Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices |
title | Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the united states, united kingdom, canada, india and the need for global harmonized practices |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6176689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319947 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_89_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansmohit comparativeevaluationofpharmacovigilanceregulationoftheunitedstatesunitedkingdomcanadaindiaandtheneedforglobalharmonizedpractices AT guptasureshkumar comparativeevaluationofpharmacovigilanceregulationoftheunitedstatesunitedkingdomcanadaindiaandtheneedforglobalharmonizedpractices |